
Please try another search
In 2016, the United States is going to learn whether renewable energy can stand on its own two feet. Barring any last minute legislative or executive action from Washington, the most significant wind power tax credit recently expired and important tax credits for solar power are about to expire.
Will solar and wind energy companies be able to make it without government subsidies? It seems unlikely, so we should be prepared for solar and wind companies to take a hit.
Between 2008 and 2014, subsidies from the Federal Government provided wind and solar energy companies with about $24 billion. Without these subsidies, it is estimated that wind and solar power would be 35% to 40% more expensive. The solar tax credit that is about to expire actually reimbursed companies for 30% of the costs of building solar installations. Two years ago, when the wind subsidy expired, wind power construction dropped by 90%! The tax credit was then retroactively extended for another year in order to help companies complete projects in progress.
Some energy companies that are heavily invested in wind and solar are taking steps to shield themselves from unprofitable “clean energy” investments. NRG Energy (N:NRG), despite its CEO’s affinity for all things “green” (he owns four electric cars), is a prime example. The company recently announced plans to spin off its renewable energy investments into a separate business in order to protect NRG’s core share price.
The U.S. is not alone in trying to wean wind and solar off of government milk – Germany, Spain, the Czech Republic, and the U.K. are all cutting government funding for these projects.
Some solar companies, like SunEdison (N:SUNE), are moving on from the U.S. and Europe, and are now looking for new markets in India and China. Just recently, the company entered into a relationship with an Indian conglomerate in order to enter the Indian energy market. Just a few days ago, SunEdison won a bid to develop a 500 MW solar project in Andhra Pradesh by offering the lowest tariffs for its solar energy – about 7 cents per kWh.
While the bid certainly pleased the Indian energy minister, Indian investors are wary. Tariffs this low are unlikely to bring in returns, and, are probably just an attempt to capture market share in India.
Q2 2023 Performance: Normalized EPS: $2.70, GAAP EPS: $2.48, Revenue: $13.51 billion Global Reach: Strong revenue growth in the US (204% increase in Q2 2023), with consistent...
PayPal shares are back trading at 2017 levels. Their price-to-earnings ratio is at an all-time low. Risks remain, but PayPal shares might be too cheap to turn down. Despite having...
S&P 500 bounced from a new low yesterday, but was it a bottom? The S&P 500 index gained 0.02% on Wednesday, as it went sideways following an intraday rebound from a new medium-term...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.