Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Beyond ICOs: Can Cryptocurrencies Find New Legitimacy Via STOs And IEOs?

By (Tanzeel Akhtar/ 10, 2019 01:30AM ET
Beyond ICOs: Can Cryptocurrencies Find New Legitimacy Via STOs And IEOs?
By (Tanzeel Akhtar/   |  Jun 10, 2019 01:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

With the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) now suing messaging service Kik Interactive on claims the company's 2017 KIN initial coin offering violated U.S. securities laws, the ICO boom phase may have just officially ended. Indeed, as the collective reputation of ICOs grows ever more tarnished by scandal-ridden offerings and increasing financial regulatory scrutiny, two new routes to tokenization could potentially reverse much of the damage, making it easier—and potentially safer—for investors to enter the cryptocurrency space.

The two new tracks, dubbed security token offerings (STOs) and initial exchange offerings (IEOs) are worth examining, in order to understand what each opportunity actually entails.

STOs Versus IEOs Versus ICOs

Though STOs are similar to ICOs in that both raise funds by exchanging money for crypto coins or tokens, distributions from STOs are considered securities. As such, explains Cryptocurrency news, the tokens "are fungible, negotiable financial instruments with attached monetary value," much like owning shares of property or a company.

Initial Exchange Offerings (IEOs) are inextricably linked to a specific exchange. According to CryptoPotato, such offerings are conducted and administered by a cryptocurrency exchange, "on behalf of the startup that seeks to raise funds with its newly issued tokens."

As the token sale is conducted on the exchange’s platform, token issuers have to pay a listing fee along with a percentage of the tokens sold during the IEO. In return, the tokens of the crypto startups are sold on the exchange’s platforms, and their coins are listed after the IEO is over. As the cryptocurrency exchange takes a percentage of the tokens sold by the startup, the exchange is incentivized to help with the token issuer’s marketing operations.

IEO participants do not send contributions to a smart contract, such as governs an ICO. Instead, they have to create an account on the exchange’s platform where the IEO is conducted. The contributors then fund their exchange wallets with coins and use those funds to buy the fundraising company’s tokens.

Daniel Tanner, CEO of Platon Finance notes that with the emergence of STOs and IEOs the ICO phase is indeed over.

A lot of ICO scams happened. This made the whole industry look bad [even] for potentially great projects that needed to raise capital.

The industry, however, hasn't let fundraising die, says Tanner. It's developed a path for projects that "investors can be sure are trustworthy and secure." The main difference between these two and ICOs, explains Tanner, is that STOs are a safer opportunity for all parties involved since they're backed by real assets and, also, they follow government regulations and law; so the future of STO projects is really promising.

Tanner offers a note of caution on IEOs, however. For those looking to enter this space, be careful and “follow the rules.” Find an exchange where the token will be listed. This alone, he points out, can take a lot of work, effort and money. An IEO is similar to an ICO, but since it’s based on exchanges, adds Tanner:

"To start the fundraising, you need to go through the exchange and their compliance rules. It brings trust and security to the investors because the exchange guarantees that the project is honest, and has the potential to be successful.”

Rise And Fall Of ICOs

To be clear, both STOs and IEOs are being called much better options for funding a project. Both have had a more promising beginning than ICOs ever had.

Maksim Izmaylov, CEO of Winding Tree says:

“[The] ICO model of raising money allowed companies to raise funds from people all over the world, the rise (and subsequent fall) of ICOs was a singular event. Security tokens are in no way different from electronic shares, with the same limitations (only accredited investors can buy them), and blockchain and decentralization doesn't have anything to do with STOs.”

One key factor is regulation and compliance, David Williams, chief technologist at BlockRules explains. Security tokens are regulated securities that are recorded on a distributed ledger.

“Security token offerings require the same level of regulatory compliance as a traditional offering like an IPO. However, unlike a traditional stock offering that is issued and traded within the purview of a single stock exchange, an STO does not need to be confined to a single market.”

Further highlighting the promise of STOs, Williams points to a recent Fintech Forum sponsored by the U.S.'s SEC. Considered one of the more conservative national regulatory bodies, he sees the SEC event as a promising step toward the acceptance of distributed ledger technology in the financial industry. Adds Williams:

“Unfortunately, STOs are sometimes compared to initial coin offerings. True, both are offerings recorded on a blockchain. But where STOs are regulatory compliant by definition, ICOs were created as an attempt to work around regulations. It is not surprising that, free of the investor protections built into security regulations, many ICOs ended up being fraudulent.”

This lack of investor protection is why some exchanges are now promoting IEOs. However, some note that this type of offering is little more than an ICO backed by a crypto exchange. A crypto exchange, however, is no substitute for proper regulatory oversight. As with all investment vehicles, due diligence should be a critical first step.

Beyond ICOs: Can Cryptocurrencies Find New Legitimacy Via STOs And IEOs?

Related Articles

Beyond ICOs: Can Cryptocurrencies Find New Legitimacy Via STOs And IEOs?

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
JAHUFAR SADIQ Jun 15, 2019 12:04PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Spencer Watkins
Spencer Watkins Jun 10, 2019 9:51AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The SEC wouldn't comment for the LONGEST time about ICO's (no regulation) and now they're suing.....See them in court.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email