Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Trump's defamation hurt my status, writer E. Jean Carroll testifies

Published 01/18/2024, 06:02 AM
Updated 01/18/2024, 05:26 PM
© Reuters. E. Jean Carroll enters Manhattan Federal Court, in the second civil trial after she accused former U.S. President Donald Trump of raping her decades ago, in New York City, U.S., January 17, 2024. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/ File Photo

By Jonathan Stempel and Luc Cohen

NEW YORK (Reuters) - E. Jean Carroll, the writer seeking millions of dollars from Donald Trump for defamation, on Thursday forcefully rejected suggestions that her reputation has been enhanced in the years since she publicly accused the former U.S. president of rape.

Carroll, 80, acknowledged at her civil damages trial that she has received more attention from media outlets and celebrities since publicizing her rape claim in June 2019 - but said she has also been widely disparaged.

"My status is lowered," Carroll said under cross-examination by Trump's lawyer Alina Habba in federal court in Manhattan. "I am partaking in this trial to bring my old reputation and status back."

Carroll is seeking at least $10 million over two statements that Trump made as president in June 2019, after the rape claim was first publicized in a memoir excerpt in New York magazine.

Trump, 77, has denied having assaulted Carroll in the mid-1990s in a Bergdorf Goodman department store dressing room in Manhattan. He said she made up the claim to promote her book.

Carroll won a $5 million verdict last May when another jury found that Trump had sexually abused her and in October 2022 defamed her by denying that anything happened.

U.S. District Judge Lewis Kaplan has already ruled that Trump sexually abused Carroll by forcing his fingers into her vagina, and that he defamed her in June 2019.

The nine-person jury need decide only how much Trump should pay Carroll. Kaplan has admonished Trump's lawyers dozens of times since the trial began on Tuesday for raising issues that he'd already decided or considered irrelevant.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A damages expert told jurors on Carroll's behalf it would cost $7.3 million to $12.1 million to repair damage that Trump's denials did to Carroll's reputation.

Trump, a Republican, has used the trial and his other legal travails to rally supporters and raise funds for his 2024 White House run, calling the cases part of a political plot.

He has separately pleaded not guilty in four state and federal criminal cases, including two alleging that he broke the law in trying to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.

MORE WELL-KNOWN, AND MORE HATED

In Thursday's proceedings, Habba told jurors that Carroll had been attacked on Twitter, now known as X, for five hours before the White House denied her claim, including that Carroll was a "disgrace" and was promoting "fake news" to ruin Trump's 2020 reelection bid.

Habba was trying to show that Trump's denials did not shatter Carroll's reputation, as the writer had testified on Wednesday, and that Carroll has leveraged her claim into newfound fame as an advocate for women.

Carroll agreed that the $5 million verdict drew praise from celebrities including Jamie Lee Curtis, John Cusack, Bette Midler, Alyssa Milano, Rob Reiner and Mira Sorvino, but said she has also drawn a "wave of slime" from detractors.

"I am more well-known, and I am hated by a lot more people," Carroll said.

The damages expert, Ashlee Humphreys, a Northwestern (NASDAQ:NWE) University professor specializing in sociology and consumer behavior, estimated that at least 21.3 million to 24.8 million people saw Trump's June 2019 statements in major media or on Twitter and likely believed them.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

She said that caused "severe" damage to Carroll's standing as "a truth teller, a sassy advice columnist," and made many people view her as a liar with a political agenda. Carroll is a Democrat.

One of Trump's lawyers highlighted on cross-examination that Humphreys' damages model said the harm to Carroll might be as little as $2.1 million. Humphreys viewed that amount as too low.

Trump attended the first two trial days, but was in Florida on Thursday for his mother-in-law's funeral.

In overnight posts on his Truth Social website, Trump attacked some of Carroll's earlier testimony, and said if the judge "does the right and PATRIOTIC thing, he will immediately dismiss the current Election Interfering Witch Hunt Trial."

The trial resumes on Monday, and Trump could testify next week.

Kaplan warned him on Wednesday that he might be ejected from the trial if he kept making comments loud enough for the jury to hear. Carroll's lawyers said they could hear Trump calling their client's case a "witch hunt" and a "con job."

Latest comments

Trump is a sex offender and has to pay money to get laid these are the facts. Alina Habba looks like she is willing but only after he pays her legal fee his wife has a prenup that says she does not need to have sex with him. So the lockerroom talk grab them by the P…is not helping his case.
Hurt her reputation? Almost nobody had ever heard of her before this lawsuit was started.  Now, half of the country knows something about her.  Maybe she will even sell a book or two because of this.  Some people might even break down to buy it just because they now know that Trump is mentioned in it.
sexual harassment and violence have no place in any society.. committed and defended by oxygen-thieves...
In any other case she would be laughed out of court and the case dismissed because she destroyed exculpatory evidence in the case!
Trump isn't the best. but this just further fuels his case of double standards. Biden has the strongest allegations against him - yet that always gets buried in news.
Allegations without evidence thats called law and order whereas Trump have plenty of evidence of his US treason even his own people witness against him. difference?
It's not a double standard and these kinds of baseless accusations come from either those ignorant of the American justice system or those eager to sow discord among Americans.
This is what happens when you don't tip the hxxker
so you admit your orange messiah was too cheap to tip, thus all these legal problems?  I am sure that's why all the christian fundies in Iowa voted for him....
I'm saying this is just another political witch hunt. This lady made no accusations against President 45 and 47 until it was politically relevant, with absolute zero proof. That's why she filed suit in one of the bluest states.
 just wait for the trials and the evidence will appear even his own lawyers spills the beans. popcorn and Cola zero have to think of my weight
This is what happens when you don't tip the hooker
Democrats don't want people to have the right to continue to say are innocent after the state declares them guilty? People have the right to say they are innocent, even after the state declares them guilty. It's a basic human right to believe in yourself and profess your innocence, especially when you are being persecuted.
"Democrats don't want people to have the right to continue to say are innocent after the state declares them guilty?"  - it's the judge's call, but hey why let fact get in the way of a good rant eh?
I'm waiting to hear from her the reason she went into a dressing room with him in the first place.  That is, if she did, of course.
If only there were some kind of index you could search if you really wanted to find and read her testimony. Or, you can keep your blinder on -- maybe she'll call to tell you about it.
Why do that when it's the reporters job to cover the testimony?  I'm kind of tired of doing their job for them.
All she wants is money.
Exactly!! And something to do. She probably doesn't get out much.
Yeah, because every 80 year old is planning for their future. Think FFS.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.