Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Police chief who delayed assault on Uvalde mass shooter is put on leave

World Jun 23, 2022 03:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Texas State Senator Roland Gutierrez, who represents Uvalde in state government, speaks to the media as he leaves a news conference held by Texas Governor Greg Abbott at Uvalde High School, three days after a gunman killed nineteen children an 2/2

By Daniel Trotta and Kanishka Singh

(Reuters) -The Texas school district police chief who has come under withering criticism for the police response to the Uvalde school massacre has been placed on administrative leave by the district and could lose his position on the Uvalde City Council.

Chief Pete Arredondo was in charge of the massive, multiagency police response to the May 24 rampage, officials have said, when a man armed with an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle slaughtered 19 school children aged 9 to 11 and two teachers.

As many as 19 officers waited over an hour in a hallway outside classrooms 111 and 112 before a U.S. Border Patrol-led tactical team finally made entry and killed the shooter.

Police practice generally is to immediately confront a school shooter, even if it puts officers' lives in danger. The director of the Texas Department of Public Safety said Arredondo made "terrible decisions" that cost valuable time.

The shooting at Robb Elementary School rocked the United States and revived the debate about guns in America. In response, the U.S. Senate on Tuesday took an initial step toward passing the country's first major gun-control legislation in decades.

The school where the shooting took place will be demolished, Uvalde's mayor said.

On Wednesday, school district superintendent Hal Harrell said in a statement he had placed Arredondo on administrative leave as the school district police chief and replaced him with a lieutenant.

Arredondo defended his actions in an interview with the Texas Tribune published on June 9, saying his primary concern was to save the lives of as many teachers and students as possible. But he said officers on scene could not find a key to unlock the door until 77 minutes after the massacre began.

He also told the Texas Tribune he did not consider himself incident commander at the scene and did not order police to hold back. His lawyer, George Hyde, told the Tribune another one of the local, state or federal agencies to arrive on the scene should have taken over command.

But Steven McCraw, the head of the Texas Department of Public Safety, said Arredondo was in charge and labeled the police response "an abject failure" for not intervening immediately.

McGraw told a Texas Senate hearing on Tuesday that the door was unlocked and there was no evidence officers tried to see if it was secured while others searched for a key. Meanwhile at least two children inside used cellphones to call for help.

Arredondo, who has kept a low profile amid public outrage in recent weeks, will have to start showing up to city council meetings or he could be removed from that post as well.

The rest of the city council on Tuesday denied a request for a leave of absence by Arredondo, who missed the meeting. If he misses three straight meetings, the council can remove him, as some members of the public demanded on Tuesday.

Arredondo, 49 and a career law enforcement officer, was elected to the city council shortly before the massacre.

Earlier Wednesday, Texas state Senator Roland Gutierrez, a Democrat who represents Uvalde, sued the state's Department of Public Safety for access to the complete records of the shooting, saying the response to the massacre "has been full of misinformation and outright lies" from the start.

Police chief who delayed assault on Uvalde mass shooter is put on leave
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Elezabeth Thomas
Elezabeth Thomas Jun 23, 2022 4:18PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Who could see that coming? He took an oath.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email