Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

U.S. Supreme Court pick Jackson rejects Republican criticism on crime

Published 03/22/2022, 06:08 AM
Updated 03/22/2022, 10:58 PM
© Reuters. Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson is seated during a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 21, 2022. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

By Moira Warburton, Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden's U.S. Supreme Court nominee, on Tuesday defended her past legal representation of Guantanamo Bay detainees and rejected Republican accusations that she had been lenient as a judge in child pornography cases.

On a contentious second day of her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing that lasted about 13 hours, Jackson pledged to be an independent jurist who would not inject her own views into rulings as Democratic senators rallied to her defense.

Several Republican senators focused their queries on child pornography, accusing Jackson of giving lenient sentences to offenders. Jackson rejected this, saying that in most of these cases she delivered sentences consistent with or higher than the recommendations of probation officers. In each such case, she said, "I did my duty to hold the defendants accountable."

Jackson said that as a mother herself, she has found the cases involving sexual crimes against children particularly harrowing. "These are the cases that wake you up at night because you're seeing the worst of humanity," Jackson said.

Jackson also said her past legal representation of detainees at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, was consistent with American values of fairness.

Nominated by Biden in February to become the first Black woman to serve on the nation's top judicial body, Jackson has served since last year as a federal appellate judge after eight years as a federal district court judge.

Her confirmation would not change the court's ideological balance - a 6-3 conservative majority - but would let Biden freshen its liberal bloc with a 51-year-old justice who could serve for decades in the lifetime post. Biden nominated Jackson to succeed retiring liberal Justice Stephen Breyer.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

With a simple majority needed for confirmation and the Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, she would get the job if Democrats remain united in the vote.

FOCUS ON SENTENCING

Republican Senators Josh Hawley, Ted Cruz, Mike Lee, Tom Cotton and Marsha Blackburn asked questions focusing on child pornography and sexual predators. They said Jackson as a trial judge in child pornography cases delivered sentences below recommendations in federal sentencing guidelines.

"I'm questioning how you used your discretion in these cases," Hawley told Jackson.

Federal judges routinely impose penalties below advisory guidelines in cases involving defendants who do not themselves produce child pornography, according to the U.S. Sentencing Commission, which has urged Congress to address inconsistencies resulting in penalties sometimes too lenient and sometimes too severe.

Sentencing experts in a March 20 letter to the committee deemed Jackson's sentencing in such cases "squarely within the mainstream of federal district court judges nationally."

Cruz also accused Jackson of "a record of activism and advocacy as it concerns sexual predators" dating back to her time in law school in 1996 when she wrote a paper discussing sexual offender registries. Jackson pushed back, saying "those are not the sentiments I expressed."

Pedophilia has become a theme among far-right activists on social media and of the unfounded QAnon conspiracy theory, whose followers cast elite liberals and Democrats as a cabal of Satanist child-sexual predators.

Cotton also blasted Jackson for reducing the sentence of a drug trafficker she had previously sent to prison for 20 years, based on a criminal justice reform law signed by former President Donald Trump in 2018.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Jackson explained that the man would not have received such a long prison term if he had been sentenced under the new law.

Cotton countered that Congress did not make the law retroactive. "You twisted the law...so you could cut the sentence of a drug kingpin," he said.

In response, Jackson said she disagreed with Cotton's assessment.

Jackson worked from 2005 to 2007 as a court-appointed lawyer paid by the government to represent criminal defendants who could not afford counsel, including four Guantanamo detainees. She later continued representing one of the detainees in private practice.

Jackson called the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the United States tragic but defended her representation of detainees captured afterward, saying: "We couldn't let the terrorists win by changing who we were fundamentally."

Republican senators also sought to tie Jackson to "critical race theory", which argues American history and institutions are infused with racial bias. Cruz tried to link Jackson to certain books available to students at Georgetown Day School, a private school in Washington where Jackson serves on the board. Jackson said the theory does not come up in her work as a judge.

Jackson declined to weigh in on calls from some on the left to expand the court's number of justices to erase its current conservative majority, calling it "a policy question for Congress."

If confirmed, Jackson would be the 116th justice to serve on the high court, the sixth woman and the third Black person. The court also would have for the first time four women and two Black justices.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

(Moira Warburton, Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung; Editing by Will Dunham, Scott Malone and Sam Holmes)

Latest comments

they hate women especially black women, remember agent Orange calling Carly Fiorina dogface?
Filibuster the Far Left Racist Activist.
A true blue *****defender.
more qualified than the last 2. did you say sexual predators, kavanaugh.
Thats a disingenuous response at best. Do your homework!
Soo pro ******* racist, bigoted, and an all around hater.. seems pretty much we expect from the fascist left..
 I see you ALL very clearly..
 It's about what she supports.. You know that! She can't even define the word "woman" for God's sake.. Hello?
 I'm another American who sees all of you for exactly what you are.. Your people's 5 seconds of fame better last a lifetime flake.. '22 '24
Here are the Republican senators who voted to confirm her appointment to the federal bench: Chuck Grassley (Iowa),,Mitch McConnell (Kentucky),,Richard Shelby (Alabama),,Jim Inhofe (Oklahoma),,Susan Collins (Maine)—twice!,,Mike Crapo (Idaho),,John Cornyn (Texas),,Lisa Murkowski (Alaska)—twice!,,Lindsay Graham (South Carolina)—twice!,,Richard Burr (North Carolina),,John Thune (South Dakota),,John Barrasso (Wyoming),,Roger Wicker (Mississippi),,Jim Risch (Idaho),,Roy Blunt (Missouri),,Jerry Moran (Kansas),,Rob Portman (Ohio),,John Boozman (Arkansas),,Pat Toomey (Pennsylvania) ,,John Hoeven (North Dakota),,Marco Rubio (Florida),,Ron Johnson (Wisconsin),,Rand Paul (Kentucky),,Mike Lee (Utah),,Tim Scott (South Carolina),,Ted Cruz (Texas),,Deb Fischer (Nebraska)
aaaand people's records change as they get older.. and change.. did you have a point?
Yes, all of these senators have changed their minds after they were 18 months "older," Your are in idiot.
I see. Your explanation is that all of these senators "changed" because they are now 18 months older. LOL. You are one bright bulb, ma'am.
I dont want anyone who is soft on child sex criminals sotting on the highest court in the land… dont care the gender, nationality or sex of the person… if we cant agree that people exploiting children for sexual oleasure dont need the steepest punishment we dont agree on anything
this is all a show it is all exposed by we the people
If you comment here against Brown Jackson you are immediately labeled a racist no matter how good your argument is against her, that’s what the left feeds on, the DIVIDE and conquer mentality while they preach tolerance.. very disturbing that we are at this point. Everyone needs to take a good long look in the mirror. Good luck everyone
I'm waiting to see a good argument against her. You know, reality based.
 blm, antifa, crt, child ******* and 1619... chew on that for a bit before you pop off again.. flake.
I'm going to guess you give a significant amount of your meager income to grifters like the Trumpster and Mike Pillow. If a few buzz words count as "arguments" to you, it must be really easy to get you to dig into your pocket for some donations. Not everybody knows this, but people like that are called saps. You a sap, John?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.