Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Tabloid publisher says he wrangled with Trump over who should buy sex stories

Published 04/25/2024, 06:01 AM
Updated 04/25/2024, 09:32 PM
© Reuters. Former U.S. President Donald Trump leaves Manhattan Supreme Court on the 6th day of the hush money trial against him on April 23 2024. Curtis Means/Pool via REUTERS

By Jack Queen, Jody Godoy and Andy Sullivan

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Former National Enquirer publisher David Pecker testified at Donald Trump's criminal trial on Thursday that he wrangled with Trump and his former lawyer ahead of the 2016 election over who should buy the silence of women who said they had sexual encounters with him.

Pecker's second day of testimony provided further evidence that he worked as Trump's "eyes and ears" to suppress stories which could have hurt the businessman-turned-politician's presidential bid at a time when he was facing multiple accusations of sexual misbehavior.

New York prosecutors have charged Trump with falsifying business records to cover up that activity, which they say corrupted the election. Trump has pleaded not guilty. Pecker does not face charges.

Pecker, 72, testified that American Media, the Enquirer's owner, paid to buy the stories of former Playboy model Karen McDougal, who said she had an affair with Trump in 2006 and 2007, and a former Trump Tower doorman who said Trump fathered an illegitimate child, which turned out not to be true.

The tabloid did not run either story but ensured that rivals would not publish them either -- a practice known as "catch and kill." Pecker said the newspaper spent hundreds of thousands of dollars over the years to buy stories involving prominent people, including movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger and golfer Tiger Woods.

Pecker said he alerted Trump's lawyer Michael Cohen when he heard that porn star Stormy Daniels was looking to sell her story of a 2006 sexual encounter with Trump for $120,000 in the weeks before the election.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Pecker said he was not interested in paying Daniels at that point because he had already paid for the other stories.

"I thought it should come off the market, and if anyone was going to buy it, Michael Cohen and Donald Trump should buy it," Pecker said."

Pecker said Cohen pressed him to buy Daniels' story, but Pecker testified he did not want to be involved with a porn star.

Cohen has said he ultimately paid Daniels $130,000 to stay silent and was reimbursed $420,000 by Trump after the election. Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records for labeling his payments to Cohen as legal fees.

Before that, Pecker testified, American Media bought McDougal's story and signed an agreement to use a shell company to secretly sell it on to Trump.

Pecker said he called off the deal after speaking with a company lawyer.

"Michael Cohen said, 'The boss is going to be very angry with you.' And I said, 'I'm sorry, I'm not going forward, the deal is off,'" Pecker testified.

"He was very angry, very upset, screaming, basically, at me," Pecker said of Cohen.

Pecker said Trump was angered when Pecker allowed McDougal to speak to news media after the Wall Street Journal revealed the hush money deal.

"He was very upset. He couldn’t understand why I did it,” Pecker testified.

McDougal is expected to testify later in the trial.

Trump has denied having sex with Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, and McDougal.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Hush money payments themselves are not illegal, and Trump's lawyers have argued the Daniels payout was personal and unrelated to his campaign.

Prosecutors say the payment was a campaign expense that should have been disclosed, and that Trump’s arrangement with the Enquirer deceived voters by suppressing stories of alleged extramarital affairs at a time when he faced accusations of sexual misbehavior.

'ELECTORAL FRAUD'

Pecker testified that he did not notify federal election officials of the McDougal payment, even though he knew that campaign expenditures made in coordination with candidates must be reported.

The Enquirer's editor, Dylan Howard, appeared to be aware of the conflict as well. "At least if he wins, I'll be pardoned for electoral fraud," Howard said in a text message prosecutors have asked to show jurors.

American Media admitted to campaign finance violations in 2018 in a deal with the Justice Department that averted prosecution and required them to cooperate with the probe.

The trial is the first of a former U.S. president and carries political risks for Trump as he prepares for a November election rematch with President Joe Biden and fends off three other criminal indictments, to which he has also pleaded not guilty.

As Trump watched Pecker testify in New York, the U.S. Supreme Court heard Trump's arguments that he is immune from prosecution for actions taken as president. Justice Juan Merchan denied Trump's request to attend the Supreme Court arguments.

Merchan has imposed a limited gag order on Trump that bars him from publicly attacking witnesses, jurors and other people close to the case, including court staff and their families.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Merchan has not yet ruled on a request by prosecutors to punish Trump for violating that order.

Trump has said the gag order violates his right to free speech and says he is being treated unfairly by Merchan.

Latest comments

Can't tell whose the tabloid Rooters or Enquirer...
Of course you can't.
Wrangling over who should pay for sex stories. This is the Republican's role model.
Yeah but did cannibals eat his uncle?
"Four more years. Pause..."
Democrat Bill Clinton taught voters that character and morality doesn't matter, remember? Oh yeah that was way before your time.
The only antidote for TDS is to re-elect Donald J. Trump....watch the trolls nibble on that
"Character and principles"? Bwahahaha! Who's the dupe now?
That candidate doesn't exist. I'm voting for the man that will stop the illegal invasion of migrants.
so many BDS sufferers commenting here..
Biden Justice Department, CIA and FBI all suppressed news coverage of Hunter Biden laptop....nothing to see here, move along
All of you that try to rationalize Presidential immunity with the murder of an opponent are all ignoring the fact that that would also trigger an immediate civil war. Of course, this is what the 2nd Amendment is all about with the right to bear arms.
Keep going, Brad. What do you suppose would be the outcome of the scenario you propose above. Do you honestly think it would have a peaceful outcome?
I did not propose a scenario above. Do toi ever pause for even one second of reflection on the extent of your misunderstandings?
- imagined an unspoken solution to an assassination of a political opponent by a president: armed rebellion.-///// I'm pretty sure they were still thinking of political upheavals, as England was still quite actively embedded in their thoughts.
*David Pecker testified at Donald Trump's criminal trial on Thursday that he wrangled with Trump and his former lawyer ahead of the 2016 election over who should buy the silence of women who said they had sexual encounters with him. * - as if The Donald was ever gonna pay that out of his own pocket.....
so many people rationalizing Trump's illegal and immoral behavior.
have you seen my missing cigar?
So, The National Enquirer buried stories detrimental to Trump. Where is the crime in that? Didn't EVERY liberal rag bury the OBVIOUSLY true story about the Hunter Biden laptop before the 2020 election?
Adrian, the FACT is, falsifying business records is a misdemeanor on a par with speeding and jaywalking.
JimmyD, that might be your opinion, but that is NOT the fact. In the State of New York, it's a Class E Felony, not a misdemeanor. Look at the case and what he is actually on trial for.
Wrong. It is a misdemeanor. It is only a felony if it was willfully done in order to cover up another crime. Bragg is trying to get a felony conviction on Trump by tying it to some kind of campaign violation, a Federal issue to which he has no authority. Those are the FACTS.
i hope the supreme court give trump immunity - then biden would have it until the end of his presidency - US's problem would be solved biden could then order the Secret Service to take trump into custody and place him in a mental institution and do the same with all the extreme right of the gop who spout utter nonsense to the media - the US could have what they want a dictatorship just not a trump one and putin and iran would have a real problem
He could also order the torture and execution of Trump as well as selected fellow psychopaths and say it is an “official presidential act done in the name of national security “
Gary Warren Hart, was running for pres a photo and scandal of a marital affair ended his run for pres - trump knew that and broke the law to hide his miss behavior - history has many lessons and trumps conviction will inform the future that honesty and following the law matters
What is it with you? You keep identifying these things that are not illegal while avoiding what Trumpo is actually changed with. Dumb or ignorant?
Bradley, a buddy of mine was offered early retirement, received a 6-month severance in exchange for signing an NDA. No NDA, no severance. Did his former company break the law? I bet you can't wait to be a teenager.
Again, what is it with you? You keep identifying these things that are not illegal while avoiding what Trumpo is actually changed with. Dumb or ignorant?
Trump was a celebrity billionaire. he didn't need to champion the cause. Thank you Mr. Trump. tds is real.
Celebrities don't need to grab girls by their pvssies, but Trump does that anyway.
*Thank you Mr. Trump.* - yes thanks for that $8T national debt and 14% unemployment, Mr Trump
Everyone knows that the reputation of the National Enquirer, but apparently to the courts and Democrats see them as trustworthy. I am just waiting for their next story about the one eyed alien baby.
LOL
Still a better reputation than that of Trump's ;-)
“Pecker said Cohen pressed him to buy Daniels' story, but Pecker testified he did not want to be involved with a porn star .” -- So the National Enquirer “did not want to be involved with a porn star”, but Trump did get involved with this porn star, whom he calls a “horse face”. How good is bestiality for his reputation?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.