Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Ex-Trump lawyer Eastman should be disbarred, California judge rules

Published 03/27/2024, 07:40 PM
Updated 03/27/2024, 09:25 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: John Eastman sits during Harrison Floyd's hearing at the Superior Court of Fulton County, in Atlanta, U.S., January 19, 2024. Jason Getz/Pool via REUTERS/File Photo

By David Thomas

(Reuters) -A California state judge on Wednesday said attorney John Eastman should be stripped of his law license for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election on behalf of Donald Trump.

Eastman, a former personal lawyer to Trump who is now his co-defendant in the Georgia criminal case over efforts to sway the election, was accused of violating California attorney ethics rules against misleading courts and making false public statements.

"Eastman’s actions were carried out with deceit or dishonesty," Judge Yvette Roland of California's State Bar Court wrote in her 128-page ruling. She held that his plan to derail Democrat Joe Biden's election victory "was unlawful and lacked any factual or legal support."

Roland presided over a disciplinary trial against Eastman last year. The California Supreme Court has the final say on all disciplinary matters.

Randall Miller, a lawyer for Eastman, said in a statement that "Dr. Eastman maintains that his handling of the legal issues he was asked to assess after the November 2020 election was based on reliable legal precedent, prior presidential elections, research of constitutional text, and extensive scholarly material."

George Cardona, the chief trial counsel for the California state bar, said in a statement that "the harm caused by Mr. Eastman’s abandonment of his duties as a lawyer, and the threat his actions posed to our democracy, more than warrant his disbarment."

Eastman was separately indicted in August 2023 in Fulton County, Georgia, and charged along with Trump and others over efforts to overturn Biden's 2020 election win in the state. Eastman and Trump pleaded not guilty.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A former law professor at Chapman University in California, Eastman drafted legal memos suggesting then-Vice President Mike Pence could refuse to accept electoral votes from several swing states when Congress convened to certify the 2020 vote count. Pence rebuffed his arguments, saying he did not have legal authority to do so under the Constitution.

Trump was also represented by Eastman in a long-shot lawsuit at the U.S. Supreme Court that sought to invalidate votes in four states where the Republican former president had falsely claimed evidence of widespread voter fraud.

Eastman repeated many of those claims at a rally outside the White House on Jan. 6, 2021, after which a mob of Trump supporters stormed the U.S. Capitol and delayed congressional certification of the election.

Several other lawyers in Trump's orbit have also faced criminal or ethics actions or both over their 2020 election efforts.

Former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani had his New York law license suspended in June 2021 and is facing potential disbarment in Washington, D.C. Former U.S. Justice Department official Jeffrey Clark is facing a disciplinary hearing this week in Washington, D.C.

Both men were charged alongside Trump and Eastman in Georgia and have pleaded not guilty.

Latest comments

Here is how magabillies and foreign chaos agents operate. Assert some misunderstanding or falsehood as a premise then draw a faulty conclusion from it. Eastman is recommended for disbarment not because of his legal opinions but because he violated the rules of the legal profession by misleading courts and making false public statements. In the age of Trump, many people with equally poor ethics would like that to be normalized, but certain values and principles remain inviolate despite the efforts of America's adversaries and its undereducated.
The United States is now a country where a lawyer can be disbarred because some judge disagrees with his legal arguments on some legal case. The long-term consequences are very worrying.
"Judge Yvette Roland of California's State Bar Court" - it's not any judge, it's a judge from a court that's specifically formed to decide disbarring decisions, and the state supreme court has the final say, that's all, now you can go back to your rant
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.