Breaking News
Investing Pro 0

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Jackson deflects Republican attacks

World Mar 23, 2022 09:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson testifies during a Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing on her nomination to the U.S. Supreme Court, on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 22, 2022. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo 2/2
 
GHM
-0.46%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Moira Warburton, Lawrence Hurley and Andrew Chung

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Republicans on Wednesday pressed their attacks on a range of issues against Ketanji Brown Jackson, President Joe Biden's nominee to become the first Black woman on the U.S. Supreme Court, as she inched closer to the end of an intense two days of questioning with Democrats coming to her defense.

Jackson, who had remained even-tempered throughout marathon questioning during her Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, showed impatience over repeated questions posed by Republicans who accused her of being too lenient as a judge in sentencing child pornography offenders.

Republican Senator Josh Hawley again pressed her on one child pornography case involving an 18-year-old defendant in which Jackson imposed a three-month sentence. He asked her if she regretted the sentence.

"Senator, what I regret is that during a hearing about my qualifications to be a justice on the Supreme Court we've spent a lot of time focusing on this small subset of my sentences," Jackson responded.

Jackson since last year has served as a federal appellate judge after eight years as a federal district judge. She noted that she had sentenced more than 100 people as a judge.

Democrats and sentencing experts have said Jackson's approach to child pornography sentencing was similar to the vast majority of federal judges.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham (NYSE:GHM), who repeatedly interrupted Jackson as she was trying to answer his questions, told her that "every judge who does what you're doing is making it easier for these children to be exploited."

"I know how serious these crimes are," Jackson said in her defense, adding that her approach was to ensure "the most serious offenders get the longest time."

Democratic Senator Dick Durbin, the committee's chairman, pushed back on Republican requests for more information on Jackson's child pornography cases, saying the issue had already been debated in detail over two days.

"There is an absurdity to this that is almost comical if it was not so dangerous," Democratic Senator Cory Booker said of the Republican attacks.

"You have earned this spot. You are worthy. You are a great American," Booker told Jackson, who could be seen wiping a tear from her eye.

So far, there is no sign that the Republican attacks are likely to derail Jackson's confirmation, with Democrats narrowly controlling the Senate. With a simple majority needed for confirmation and the Senate divided 50-50 between the parties, she would get the job if Democrats remain united regardless of how the Republicans vote.

HARVARD CASE

Under questioning from her former Harvard Law School classmate Senator Ted Cruz, Jackson said that if confirmed to the lifetime job she planned not to participate in a major Supreme Court case involving the university because she serves on its board of overseers.

The case, to be heard in the court's next term that begins in October, involves a challenge to the affirmative action admissions policy Harvard uses to increase its number of Black and Hispanic students.

Her confirmation would not change the court's ideological balance - it has a 6-3 conservative majority - but would let Biden freshen its liberal bloc with a 51-year-old jurist young enough to serve for decades. The Democratic president nominated Jackson last month to the lifetime post to succeed retiring liberal Justice Stephen Breyer.

Facing more long hours of often-antagonistic questioning during the hearing's third day, she remained mostly unflappable, beginning most responses with a polite, "Thank you, Senator."

Durbin praised Jackson for her poise and said some Republicans had used the hearing as "an opportunity to showcase talking points for the November election" when control of Congress is up for grabs, including the argument that Democrats are "soft on crime."

"Well, you have made a mess of their stereotype," Durbin said, pointing to the fact that she has been endorsed by various law enforcement groups.

Republicans also have criticized her legal representation earlier in her career of some detainees at the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, and tried to link Jackson to activist groups on the left and to "critical race theory," which argues American history and institutions are infused with racial bias.

There are signs that not all Republican senators agree with targeting Jackson's record on sentencing. Republican Senator Thom Tillis said during the hearing he was "sympathetic to some of it, not necessarily all of it" when describing claims made his colleagues. Republican Senator Mitt Romney told the Washington Post the attacks on Jackson were "off course."

Jackson's testimony is due to end on Wednesday, with outside experts scheduled for Thursday's final day of the hearing.

If confirmed, Jackson would be the 116th justice to serve on the high court, the sixth woman and the third Black person. With Jackson on the bench, the court for the first time would have four women and two Black justices.

U.S. Supreme Court nominee Jackson deflects Republican attacks
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (12)
gab nea
gab nea Mar 24, 2022 3:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
pedo, is that a q anon slogan?
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Mar 24, 2022 3:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
It's called projection.
gab nea
gab nea Mar 24, 2022 3:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
the republican senators wanted to sound tough on crime after 4 yrs of trump's lawlessness.
John Hat
John Hat Mar 24, 2022 12:17AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Pe-Do defender.
william robert
william robert Mar 23, 2022 10:32PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I pity the stream here. Shows minds of negligible significance
Maximus Maximus
Maximus Maximus Mar 23, 2022 6:31PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Don't see your problem here. A better chance of justice for all. Besides, she's more qualified than most of the corrupt old wasps and hebrews that traditionally fill the role.
John Lakran
John Lakran Mar 23, 2022 6:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Ha deflects she looked exactly like the progressive crazy lib she is. Please define woman for me? I can't? ********you don't belong anyone near a bench period.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Mar 23, 2022 5:06PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The GQP sure knows how to agitate the mouth breathers. Although Jackson was confirmed to the Federal bench just 18 months ago with dozens of Republican senators voting for her, now that the cameras are on, they are suddenly aghast at this eminently qualified nominee. They know exactly what they are doing: tickling the old racists' hate bone.
John Laurens
John Laurens Mar 23, 2022 4:39PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Racist CRT BLM bigot right there!
Gus McCrae
Gus McCrae Mar 23, 2022 3:33PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
republicans baaaad, first black woman SCOTUS gooood, Graham baaaaaddd Brandon gooood, good massa Brandon
kirt myer
kirt myer Mar 23, 2022 2:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
'Reuters resumes attacks on Republicans'
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Mar 23, 2022 2:50PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
When people have their words accurately described, it is not an attack, it's a description.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email