Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Biden's pick for top U.S. civil rights lawyer, Kristen Clarke, faces fraught task

WorldApr 13, 2021 06:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. U.S. President-elect Joe Biden announces Justice Department nominees at his transition headquarters in Wilmington, Delaware

By Sarah N. Lynch

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden's nominee to lead the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division, Kristen Clarke, is poised to take on the role at a fraught time in American history.

Clarke will face a Senate hearing this week as hate crimes against Asian Americans are on the rise, Republican-led state legislatures are advancing bills that voting-rights groups say would disenfranchise Black voters and former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin is on trial facing a charge of murdering a Black man, George Floyd.

Clarke will appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday alongside Todd Kim, Biden's nominee to lead the department's Environmental and Natural Resources Division.

Kim, like Clarke, previously worked in the Justice Department division he is now nominated to lead. Most recently, he served as a deputy counsel in the U.S. Department of Energy.

Former colleagues say Clarke's experience, both as a Justice Department lawyer and as executive director of a large civil rights organization, make her qualified to tackle the challenge.

"If you were inventing a nominee from scratch... you'd come up with Kristen or someone very, very close," said Justin Levitt, a former colleague who teaches law at Loyola Law School.

Clarke has spent a good chunk of her career advocating for voting rights issues.

Ernest Montgomery, a councilman in Calera, Alabama, said he was impressed by Clarke when he met her in 2010.

Montgomery was an intervener in Shelby County v. Holder, a 2010 voting rights case arising from a dispute over whether states and counties must seek preclearance, or approval, from the federal government before re-drawing voting districts. He got involved as a third-party advocate in the litigation after the city re-drew his district's lines, diluting the Black vote.

Clarke, then an attorney with the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, represented him, arguing in support of requiring federal preclearance of redistricting as a crucial constitutional protection to root out discrimination against minority voters.

"She did a superb job," Montgomery said.

The lower courts sided with Clarke's view on preclearance, but in 2013 the Supreme Court reversed and gutted a core part of the 1965 Voting Rights Act in a move civil rights lawyers say made it easier to discriminate against voters of color.

Since 2016, Clarke has led the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. The most intense time in that job arguably occurred around the 2020 presidential election, when former President Donald Trump refused to concede to Biden and made baseless claims of voter fraud.

"It was non-stop," Clarke's colleague with the Lawyer's Committee, Jon Greenbaum, said of the group's voting rights work in 2020. "It was high stakes."

Clarke's nomination is expected to dominate much of Wednesday's confirmation hearing, with some Republicans poised to pounce after conservative media launched a series of attacks on her dating back to her days as a student at Harvard University.

One has centered on comments in her college paper intended as parody about Black people having "greater mental, physical and spiritual abilities" in an effort to counter the controversial 1994 book "The Bell Curve," which made arguments linking race and intelligence.

Another group claimed without evidence that Clarke is anti-Semitic based on a speaker she invited to a college campus event decades ago, and that she "believes single black mothers raise criminals."

Clarke is a divorced, single Black mother, and her comments were about the challenges Black families face when trying to raise children without a father figure.

Attorney General Merrick Garland, in his confirmation hearing in February, sought to beat back some of the criticism.

"I do not believe that she is anti-Semitic," said Garland, who is Jewish. "I do not believe she is discriminatory in any sense."

Biden's pick for top U.S. civil rights lawyer, Kristen Clarke, faces fraught task
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email