Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Biden voting rights push scotched by Democrats Sinema, Manchin

Published 01/13/2022, 06:11 AM
Updated 01/13/2022, 10:46 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden arrives to deliver remarks on voting rights during a speech on the grounds of Morehouse College and Clark Atlanta University in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S., January 11, 2022. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/File Photo

By Steve Holland and Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Joe Biden's attempt to rally Democrats on Thursday to alter Senate rules and pass voting-rights legislation was stymied, even before he arrived at the U.S. Capitol, by opposition from a key moderate lawmaker.

U.S. Senator Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona said in a speech https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senator-sinema-defends-filibuster-despite-bidens-plea-reform-it-2022-01-13 on the Senate floor on Thursday - less than an hour before Biden's lunchtime arrival - that the "filibuster rule" that allows a minority of senators to block legislation was necessary to prevent worsening political divisions in the country.

After Biden left the Capitol following his meeting with Democrats, West Virginia Democrat Joe Manchin joined Sinema in opposing Senate rule changes.

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer nonetheless announced late on Thursday that the Senate will begin debate on the legislation next Tuesday. If Republicans block that bill as anticipated, Schumer said he was prepared to seek a change in the Senate's filibuster rule to win passage.

While officials were not anticipating any quick breakthroughs, Biden continued pressing his case with Sinema and Manchin into the evening. The two senators met Biden at the White House for a meeting that lasted well over an hour, the administration said.

None of the participants spoke to media afterwards. A White House official characterized the meeting as a "candid and respectful exchange of views."

Earlier, when he left the Capitol, the president acknowledged his party may not succeed in getting a voting rights bill passed.

"I hope we can get this done, but I'm not sure," Biden told reporters. "One thing for certain: Like every other major civil rights bill that came along, if we miss the first time, we can come back and try it a second time. We missed this time."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Biden and many fellow Democrats have ratcheted up their campaign to pass voting-rights https://www.reuters.com/world/us/biden-champion-voting-rights-georgia-clock-ticks-reforms-2022-01-11 legislation after spending much of his first year in office on infrastructure and spending bills focused on COVID-19 relief, infrastructure and social safety-net programs.

They are pushing new legislation that they say would protect access to the ballot, particularly for minority voters, as Republican-controlled states enact new restrictions ahead of Nov. 8 congressional elections.

Non-white voters disproportionately support Democratic candidates for office.

The Democratic-controlled House of Representatives passed a voting bill on Thursday. But Democrats cannot overcome universal Republican opposition in the Senate without changing the chamber's filibuster rule https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-senate-democrats-mull-ending-filibuster-pass-voting-rights-reform-2022-01-11, which requires 60 of the 100 senators to agree on most legislation. Democrats hold 50 seats.

"I will not support separate actions that worsen the underlying disease of division in our country," Sinema said on the Senate floor.

Sinema and Manchin voted https://www.reuters.com/markets/rates-bonds/deal-avert-us-default-raise-debt-limit-faces-test-senate-2021-12-09 in December to side-step the 60-vote threshold to raise the nation's debt limit without Republican support.

'DIFFICULT' PATH

Independent Senator Angus King, who caucuses with the Democrats, said he thought Biden made a powerful case when he met with lawmakers.

"It looks like the path forward is very difficult, particularly based on Senator Sinema's statement today," he said. "She believes that the risk of changing the filibuster is greater than the risk of what's going on in the states. I hope profoundly that she's right. I fear that she's wrong."

The House repackaged and passed two elections-related bills as one, sending it to the Senate under a special procedure preventing Republicans from blocking debate. The bill was approved along party lines.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"Make no mistake, the United States Senate will for the first time this Congress debate voting rights legislation beginning on Tuesday," Schumer said late on Thursday. Three separate attempts to debate the legislation last year were stymied by Republicans.

Mitch McConnell, the Senate's minority leader, on Wednesday reiterated that Republicans oppose Democrats' voting-rights legislation and changes to the filibuster.

Democratic former President Barack Obama wrote in a USA Today opinion piece on Thursday that the filibuster rule has become a tool for the chamber's minority to obstruct moves supported by most voters.

"We can't allow it to be used to block efforts to protect our democracy," Obama wrote.

Latest comments

Thank God the hater in chief was stopped again. what a freaky hateful weirdo..
Reuters as a typical leftwing MSM, repeats the same lie of the socialists that GOP in 19 states made it harder to vote. Voting is a sacred duty of the Citizens, and requiring voter ID is a basic requirement, but the liberal left want to remove it! That’s the reality. What a shame!
It's not a lie that they made it harder to vote. You only focus on the ID issue, but it's much more than that. They have made it harder to vote by restricting voting hours, reducing the number of voting stations in lower income areas, reducing the number of drop-boxes for mail-in, and many other things. Personally, I agree that people should have to show ID to vote, but many of the other changes red states have made are clearly targeted at making it harder for low-income voters to vote, even if they have ID.
Republicans didnt abolish it when they had the majority neither should Democrats now. Razor thin majorities in the house and senate and a narrowly won Presidency are not a mandate. Both parties need to get back to working together and uniting instead of trying to manipualte and steal elections from each other.
Instead of working together, I prefer gridlock.
In the words of Master Yoda, "Brandon let us go he should."
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.