Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Analysis-Biden kept a Trump-era border policy in place - that was a mistake, allies say

WorldJul 07, 2021 06:20AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: An asylum-seeking migrant youth, who was apprehended and returned to Mexico under Title 42 after crossing the border from Mexico into the U.S., rests in a public square where hundreds of migrants live in tents, in Reynosa, Mexico June 9, 2021. 2/2

By Ted Hesson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President Joe Biden has frustrated allies by keeping in place a Trump-era border expulsion policy opposed by human rights activists and health experts, and has appeared to gain little politically as Republicans criticize his handling of the border.

The so-called Title 42 order has allowed U.S. officials to immediately expel migrants who cross the border illegally. The Biden administration is now aiming to exempt families from the policy at the end of July after defending it for months as necessary to help stop the spread of COVID-19 across the southern border, according to three people familiar with the matter.

    Human rights groups and migration advocates have cheered the potential move, but some say the Democratic president made a politically costly mistake in keeping it in place for so long. They argue that it has done little to deter hundreds of thousands of migrants, nor has it insulated him from Republican attacks that his policies have fueled a spike in migration from Central America.

"No matter what President Biden does at the border, many will criticize him for it," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, policy counsel at the immigrant advocacy group American Immigration Council, who has called for an end to Title 42. "So he should just do the right thing and take the action that respects the law and allows people to seek protection."

The Title 42 order has also given Republican critics ammunition, as it helped inflate the number of arrests to 20-year highs in recent months. Because many migrants are simply expelled to Mexico and not deported to their home countries, one person can be arrested repeatedly for multiple crossings, making it appear more people are crossing the border than is the case.

Crucially, keeping the policy in place has also cost Biden much-needed support among migrant advocacy groups who traditionally play a key role in providing legal representation and basic services to recently arrived migrants and whose members have worked closely with the Biden administration.

Clara Long, an associate director with the New York City-based Human Rights Watch, said the Biden administration squandered goodwill with advocates who are now worried future Biden plans could limit asylum access.

"If they had lifted Title 42 right away, there would have been a lot more reason to trust they would settle on a principled and generous approach," she said.

The groups have added to the Republican pressure on Biden by publicly opposing some of the options the administration is reportedly considering to replace Title 42, such as using ankle bracelets to monitor migrants' movements or putting migrants through an expedited process to obtain asylum or be deported.

While Biden came into office promising a more humane immigration system he has repeatedly found that unwinding the web of restrictionist policies of his predecessor Donald Trump has been logistically and politically difficult.

Underpinning the administration's decision to keep Title 42 has been a fear that lifting the restrictions could encourage even more migrants from Central America and elsewhere to come to the border, potentially undermining public support for Biden's broader immigration agenda.

    A White House spokesperson defended the administration's decision to continue the border expulsions.

    "We are still in the midst of a global pandemic and there are many people coming to our border who come from high transmission countries," the spokesperson said. "Because we have to process people in congregate settings, we are still working under COVID protocols that restrict the number of people in our facilities."

Biden officials stress that they have made humanitarian exceptions to Title 42, allowing unaccompanied migrant children and many families to enter the United States to pursue their cases for asylum or other forms of protection.

INCREASINGLY ISOLATED

But the administration has appeared increasingly isolated in its determination to hold onto the policy, which human rights groups and the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees say has led to expelled migrants facing violence and kidnappings in northern Mexico.

One prominent Biden ally who previously defended the administration's decision to keep Title 42 has reversed course.

    Andrew Selee, president of the Migration Policy Institute, a Washington-based think tank, tweeted in February that keeping Title 42 in place while reworking the asylum system and immigration enforcement would help avoid an increase in migration.

    Selee told Reuters he has now changed mind and believes its effectiveness as a deterrent is questionable, as border arrests have climbed in recent months.

    "It doesn't make sense to keep it in place if it's not actually deterring migration," said Selee, who briefed Vice President Kamala Harris on migration issues in April. "My hope was that they would buy some time to build a real functioning system at the border. But that didn't quite happen."

The Biden administration is considering ending Title 42 for families by the end of July, according to those familiar with the deliberations, but this is unlikely to placate migrant advocates and Democratic lawmakers.

If the administration ends Title 42, it could be faced with the choice of either releasing the migrants into the United States to pursue their immigration cases, which can take years to resolve at the current pace, or placing them in detention.

If Biden ramps up deportation and detention - which are opposed by advocates and some Democrats - he could alienate allies who have assisted with the processing of asylum seekers at the border and supported other parts of his more welcoming approach to immigration.

    More than 100 immigrant advocacy organizations said in a June letter that the possible use of ankle monitors, expanded detention and a faster deportation process known as "expedited removal" to deal with incoming migrants would be both inhumane and ineffective.

Analysis-Biden kept a Trump-era border policy in place - that was a mistake, allies say
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (5)
Mike Brooks
Mike Brooks Jul 07, 2021 2:08PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
FYI, Obama deported the most. DYOR. ALSO, grandpa Earpiece caused the border crisis.
John Doe
ForexInsiders Jul 07, 2021 11:34AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The "Border Policies" have been the same since Clinton began them. And now both Obama and Joe "out caged" more children than Trump did. Funny though, none of them have addressed the unreal visa costs that keep rising. Seems they smart thing to do, would be to lower those cost, keep building the wall. Law abiding people will then be able to afford to get in legally, and the criminals will be stuck getting past the wall. We wouldnt have nearly the "immigration crisis" we do today if our government actually made it feasible to enter in the first danm place. Literally seems manufactures, because the easy solution is right there.
Connecticut Yankee
A_Jaundiced_Eye Jul 07, 2021 8:24AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
"Clara Long, an associate director with the New York City-based Human Rights Watch..." Don't you love how people lecturing about opening up the TX, AZ borders are people who live in NYC or San Francisco, 1000's of miles away?
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Jul 07, 2021 7:59AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Open borders help the population depend on the government. The establishment and Democrats want that for subtle communism like China.
Silence Dogood
Silence Dogood Jul 07, 2021 6:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The border SS and the defund the police / crime wave is 100% on the dems, and it sill be their undoing in 2022 and 2024.
Notvery Goodathis
Peteymcletey Jul 07, 2021 6:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
will it though? seems like most people just stopped watching news completely. ignore it, and it never happened
one two
one two Jul 07, 2021 6:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
but for that to happen you have to stop voting for comprising RINOs that dont care about putting America First before their paycheck and job security.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email