Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Twitter briefly restricts Trump campaign account, Republicans decry company's actions

Published 10/15/2020, 11:50 AM
Updated 10/15/2020, 11:16 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump hosts roundtable discussion on the reopening of U.S. economy at the White House in Washington

By Elizabeth Culliford and Nandita Bose

(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's re-election campaign's Twitter account was briefly restricted on Thursday, causing an outcry from Republican lawmakers who accused social media companies of acting like "speech police" and vowing to hold Twitter responsible.

Twitter temporarily blocked the @TeamTrump account from sending tweets after it posted a video about Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden's son that it said violated its rules.

The video referred to a New York Post story from Wednesday that contained alleged details of Hunter Biden's business dealings with a Ukrainian energy company and said the former vice president had met with an adviser of the company.

Biden campaign spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement that Republican-led Senate committees have previously concluded that Joe Biden engaged in no wrongdoing related to Ukraine. He also denied such a meeting had taken place.

A Twitter spokesman said earlier on Thursday that the @TeamTrump account, and the accounts of White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany and the New York Post, had been blocked from tweeting because of the company's policies on hacked materials and posting private information. He said the accounts may need to delete the rule-breaking posts to continue tweeting.

Twitter policy chief Vijaya Gadde said late on Thursday the company has decided to make changes to its hacked materials policy following feedback on its enforcement earlier.

"We will no longer remove hacked content unless it is directly shared by hackers or those acting in concert with them," Gadde said in a tweet https://twitter.com/vijaya/status/1316923557268652033. "We will label Tweets to provide context instead of blocking links from being shared on Twitter."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Twitter also said that despite the new policy the New York Post story would still be blocked. A company spokesman said the stories would still be blocked for "violating the rules on private personal information."

The Trump campaign, with 2.2 million followers, was sending tweets again on Thursday afternoon. It said in a new tweet it was "re-posting the video Twitter doesn't want you to watch." A Twitter spokesman told Reuters that the site would not take action as alterations to the video meant it no longer violated its policies.

"It's going to all end up in a big lawsuit and there are things that can happen that are very severe that I'd rather not see happen, but it's probably going to have to," Trump said when asked about the move by Twitter.

McEnany likewise began tweeting again on Thursday, saying she regained access after deleting her post on the report.

Both Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) and Twitter took proactive steps on Wednesday to restrict dissemination of the Post story in the hours after it was published.

Facebook reduced how often the story shows up in users' news feeds and elsewhere on the platform, an action spokesman Andy Stone said the company takes temporarily pending fact checker review "if we have signals that a piece of content is false."

Facebook did not respond to Reuters questions on whether its fact-checking partners were working on rating the Post's story.

Twitter prohibited its users from posting links to two New York Post articles about Hunter Biden, saying they violated its policies against posting private information and "hacked materials."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

But Twitter's Chief Executive Jack Dorsey tweeted on Wednesday "our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we're blocking: unacceptable."

A Twitter spokesman declined to answer Reuters questions on whether Dorsey had been involved in the decisions on these restrictions on Wednesday or Thursday.

Republicans on the House of Representatives Judiciary Committee responded to Twitter's actions by tweeting a link to a copy of the New York Post's story on its website. Twitter blocked the link but later said this had been in error and reversed the action.

The @nypost has not tweeted in over a day, suggesting that they are still blocked from posting.

A spokeswoman for the New York Post declined to comment, other than referring Reuters to the Post's own coverage.

SENDING SUBPOENAS Republican lawmakers slammed the social media companies' actions on Thursday. U.S. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell said the blocking of the story was "reprehensible" and that there should be no "speech police" in the United States.

After Twitter imposed the restrictions, the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee moved to subpoena Dorsey.

Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (NYSE:GHM) and Republican senators Ted Cruz and Josh Hawley said the committee will vote on sending the subpoena on Tuesday, Oct. 20 and plans to have Dorsey in front of the committee by Oct. 23.

Hawley also called for sending a subpoena to Facebook.

"We're going to finally have an accounting that is long overdue," Graham said. "This to me crystallizes the problem better than anything I could think of."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Senator Marco Rubio urged Federal Communications Commission Chairman Ajit Pai to re-examine Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.

The CEOs of Twitter, Facebook and Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) Inc's Google are set to appear before the Senate Commerce Committee later this month at a hearing to discuss Section 230 - a legal immunity which offers tech companies protection from liability over content posted by users and enables them to act in "good faith" to remove objectionable content.

Pai said on Thursday the agency will move forward to set new rules to clarify the meaning of the provision.

The calls to reform Section 230 and penalize tech companies have been intensifying but it is unlikely there will be action on the law by Congress this year.

Latest comments

Trump's got 90 days left in the White House. I guess the Drama Queen can Parade in his Underwear until then.
It's Funny...facebook always blocks posts that it Shouldn't...and, Doesn't block posts that it Should. That company is getting Ridiculous.
these are businesses amd as a business they can censor whateber they want. Trump lovers should build their own social sites and quit using ours.
Every day that passes, Trumps Landslide win grows. The corruption on the left is off the charts.. and that's good for investors.
Tired of corupt politicians.Term limits for all. 8. 10 and 12. President, Congressman and Senators.
Social media companies do their best to delete lies, and false accusations. Trump makes them work overtime.
Twitter is aligned with the radical left
So are facts
judging by that debate with Kamala hariss im going to have to say that facts aren’t on their side either.
Nothing like putting your thumb on the scale.
Twitter is for twits.
screw twitter
It is their platform, they can block any one per user agreement
If Trump would stop tweeting lies, and false accusations, maybe social media companies would stop.
Democrats never tweeted “Liberate Michigan” or that they’re immune and nobody should fear the virus ha
Trump and his kids have dozens of known corrupt actions that make Hunter Biden look like a saint by comparison
What Brian said: Ditto! lol
they both have *** get over it
Taking over 2 million from a child cancer fund. Admitting to recieve loans from Russian banks. Those are two. I’ll vote for any American that can get a loan from an American bank. That takes the Trump family out of it.
trump and his team just make stuff up and their followers swallow it whole. it is lies and not protected speech to make false accusations and fabricate or manipulate source information for use information obtained from criminal activity
Like what the Dems tried to impeach Trump when it has been proven factually it was the Dems who colluded with the Russians with 2016 election. It was the Dems who interfere with election.HC personally signed off on the Russiagate farce to distract attention from her email scandal, according to a Russian intelligence analysis that was obtained by U.S. intelligence agencies in July 2016.1) HC and DNC paid for the fake dossier.2) Corrupt FBI agents lied to get FISA warrants3) FBI spy on Trump campaign 4) BO and JB had knowledge of all of this. Should I continue? There may be a space limitation here. LOL
Like what the Dems tried to impeach DT when it has been proven factually it was the Dems who colluded with the Russians with 2016 election. It was the Dems who interfere with election.
Justice for SEAL Team 6 will happen
We must know that almost all media companies are left-leaning or left-controlled. When I want to read about the left bad behavior, the only source I can refer to is from outside the US.
Good move
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.