🔮 Better than the Oracle? Our Fair Value found this +42% bagger 5 months before Buffett bought itRead More

U.S. Supreme Court to hear SEC bid to avoid challenge to in-house judges

Published 05/16/2022, 10:01 AM
Updated 05/16/2022, 10:11 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A visitor runs across the Supreme Court Plaza while attempting to catch their school group, at the U.S. Supreme Court on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., February 22, 2022. REUTERS/Tom Brenner
AXON
-

By Andrew Chung

(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear the Securities and Exchange Commission's bid to block a challenge to the constitutionality of its in-house tribunal brought by a Texas accountant who the agency punished after faulting her audits of publicly traded companies.

The justices took up the SEC's appeal of a lower court ruling that revived certified public accountant Michelle Cochran's challenge. The lower court rejected the agency's argument that under a U.S. law called the Securities Exchange Act Cochran could not contest the constitutionality of the tribunal's judges in federal court before the end of the SEC's administrative enforcement proceeding against her.

Cochran's case is similar to one involving Taser manufacturer Axon Enterprise (NASDAQ:AXON) Inc, which is contesting an antitrust action against it by another federal agency, the Federal Trade Commission. The Supreme Court in January agreed to hear Axon's appeal of a lower court ruling that threw out its challenge to the constitutionality of the FTC's structure.

An SEC judge in 2017 had found that Cochran failed to comply with auditing standards in violation of the Securities Exchange Act, fining her $22,500 and banning her from practicing as an accountant before the commission for five years. The SEC cited deficiencies in her audits of publicly traded companies.

Cochran sued the SEC in 2019 to stop the enforcement action against her, arguing that its in-house judges, who enforce investor protection laws and regulations, have job protections that unlawfully insulate them from a president's power to control executive branch officers under the U.S. Constitution's Article II.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A visitor runs across the Supreme Court Plaza while attempting to catch their school group, at the U.S. Supreme Court on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., February 22, 2022. REUTERS/Tom Brenner

After the Supreme Court in 2018 ruled that the way the SEC's judges were appointed violated the Constitution, the agency set aside the decision against Cochran and assigned her case to a new, properly appointed judge.

A federal judge in Texas threw out Cochran's challenge, finding that the Securities Exchange Act stripped him of any power to hear challenges to ongoing SEC enforcement proceedings. The New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, reviving the case, prompting President Joe Biden's administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.