Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

U.S. needs full access to Chinese company audit papers to resolve accounting dispute - watchdog

Stock Markets Aug 01, 2022 06:11PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission logo adorns an office door at the SEC headquarters in Washington, June 24, 2011. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

By Katanga Johnson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. public company accounting regulator will not accept any restrictions on its access to the audit papers of Chinese companies listed in New York, its chair said on Monday, confirming a Reuters story published last week.

Washington and Beijing are in talks to settle a long-running dispute over the auditing compliance of U.S.-listed Chinese companies. China authorities have long been reluctant to let overseas regulators inspect local accounting firms, citing national security concerns.

Reuters reported on July 26 that the main sticking point relates to the amount of access China is willing to grant the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), which oversees audits of U.S.-listed companies, to companies' papers. While Chinese counterparts want various degrees of access, the PCAOB says U.S. law requires complete access.

"Access to the U.S. capital markets is a privilege. It's not a right. And the law is really clear that a part of those privileges comes with granting PCAOB complete access to the audit work papers of companies that are listed on the U.S. markets," Erica Williams, PCAOB chair, told Reuters in an interview on Monday.

"If we aren't able to get complete access to audit working papers - no loopholes, no exceptions - all of the companies in China that are listed on U.S. exchanges would have a trading prohibition in the U.S.," she said.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which oversees the PCAOB, would make this final decision after the PCAOB determines whether China has granted full access.

"We have to make a determination by the end of this year. Notwithstanding that, we are doing whatever we can in order to try to reach an agreement," Williams said.

The oversight dispute, which has been simmering for more than a decade, came to a head in December when the SEC finalized rules to potentially prohibit trading in Chinese companies under the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act. It said there were 273 companies at risk.

Williams said her agency is in daily discussions with Chinese regulators and while time is of the essence to reach an agreement, the resulting inspections and investigations "will take as long as it takes."

"While we need to get an agreement as soon as possible, we must be sure that we faithfully execute the law," she said.

"China knows what it needs to do. PCAOB inspectors are standing ready with the necessary resources for inspection.

China has previously said that both sides are committed to reaching a deal, although the United States has been more cautious on the outlook.

"We will not send our team over until we have at least an agreement and then we have to test out whether what's on paper actually works in practice," said Williams.

U.S. needs full access to Chinese company audit papers to resolve accounting dispute - watchdog
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
David Ganser
David Ganser Aug 02, 2022 1:55AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The foundation of public capital market trust in USA has always been confidence in the numbers.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email