Get 40% Off
💰 Buffett reveals a $6.7B stake in Chubb. Copy the full portfolio for FREE with InvestingPro’s Stock Ideas toolCopy Portfolios

US House Republicans seek to halt Biden EV regulations

Published 12/06/2023, 08:07 PM
Updated 12/07/2023, 11:31 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Tesla electric vehicle is plugged to a charger in a parking lot in Teia, north of Barcelona, Spain, October 31, 2023. REUTERS/Albert Gea/File Photo
GM
-
F
-
TM
-
STLA
-

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-led House of Representatives voted on Wednesday to bar the Biden administration from moving forward with stringent vehicle emissions regulations that would result in 67% of new vehicles being electric by 2032.

"While EVs may play a large role in the future of the auto industry, Washington should not discount other technologies like hydrogen, hybrids, and the internal combustion engine," said Republican Tim Walberg, a sponsor of the legislation.

The 221 to 197 vote, which included five Democrats joining 216 Republicans, drew a veto threat from the White House, which said it would "catastrophically impair" the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) ability to issue automotive regulations.

Former President Donald Trump, who is seeking to return to the White House, has vowed to reverse the Biden administration's electric vehicle rules.

The EPA said in April the proposed 2027 to 2032 standards would cut emissions by 56% compared to the existing 2026 requirements, or 13% annual average pollution cuts.

The agency projects the rules would cut more than 9 billion tons of carbon dioxide emissions through 2055 - equivalent to more than twice total U.S. CO2 emissions last year. Final rules are expected early next year.

Automakers, auto dealers and the United Auto Workers (UAW) union have called on the Biden administration to finalize a less stringent proposal.

The UAW, which represents workers at General Motors (NYSE:GM), Ford Motor (NYSE:F) and Chrysler parent Stellantis (NYSE:STLA), said in July the EPA proposal should "better reflect the feasibility of compliance so that the projected adoption of (zero emission vehicles) is set to feasible levels, increases stringency more gradually, and occurs over a greater period of time."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A group representing major automakers has called for significantly softening requirements, saying the EPA proposal was "neither reasonable nor achievable."

Toyota Motor (NYSE:TM) has called the EPA proposal stringency requirements "extreme and outside historical norms."

The auto trade group called the proposal a "de facto battery electric vehicle mandate."

Representative Frank Pallone, the top Democrat on the Energy and Commerce Committee, said Wednesday Republicans were trying to "legislate away years of innovation in cleaner transportation to put polluters over people."

Latest comments

Oil and auto industries kept the CAFE standards stagnant for 30 years of lost fuel efficiency gains until 2007. They want to do it again.  We have the technologies to meet 50 mpg levels now if they'd implement them in IC engines. They won't progress unless they are forced to, it's all about the record profits they chase, not about what's right for consumers or the environment.
ICEs are more efficient now than they have ever been. This is about trying to railroad the consumer into EVs, which they neither want nor need. (Nor can afford ATM) Besides which, the electric grid can’t handle the kind of influx of EVs that the administration is trying to force upon us.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.