Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

U.S. gun makers urge judge to throw out Mexico's $10 billion lawsuit

Stock Markets Apr 12, 2022 03:22PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Smith & Wesson logo is displayed during the annual National Rifle Association (NRA) convention in Dallas, Texas, U.S., May 6, 2018. REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

By Nate Raymond

BOSTON (Reuters) -A U.S. judge on Tuesday questioned whether allowing Mexico to sue U.S. gun manufacturers for facilitating the trafficking of weapons to drug cartels would open the door to other countries suing them, including Russia over firearms used by Ukrainians in the ongoing war.

U.S. District Judge F. Dennis Saylor in Boston raised that prospect as he weighed whether to dismiss Mexico's $10 billion lawsuit seeking to hold gun makers including Smith & Wesson and Sturm, Ruger & Co responsible for a deadly flood of weapons across the border.

Mexico in a lawsuit filed in August accused the companies of undermining its strict gun laws by designing, marketing and distributing military-style assault weapons in ways they knew would arm drug cartels, fueling murders and kidnappings.

It said over 500,000 guns are trafficked annually from the United States into Mexico, of which more than 68% are made by the gun makers it sued, which also include Beretta USA, Barrett Firearms Manufacturing, Colt's Manufacturing Co and Glock Inc.

"They know how criminals are getting their guns," Jonathan Lowy, a lawyer for Mexico, argued during the 90-minute virtual hearing. "They could stop and they choose to be willfully blind to the facts."

But Saylor questioned whether Mexico's stance would mean the protections gun makers typically enjoy under the federal Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) from lawsuits over their products' misuse is "completely hollow."

He asked why if Mexico could sue the gun makers other countries could not too, such as Italy over mafia killings, Israel over attacks by Palestinian militant group Hamas, or even Russia over the deaths of its soldiers in Ukraine if the companies' guns were used.

"If Ukrainians are using United States manufactured military weapons or Smith & Wesson revolvers for that matter to defend themselves, can the government of Russia come in and say you have caused us harm?" he asked. "I mean, why not, if your theory is right?"

Steven Shadowen, another lawyer for Mexico, said other foreign counties could sue too if they met the requirements, though he said U.S. courts could refuse to hear a case if it presented a political question.

But Andrew Lelling, a lawyer for Smith & Wesson, said it would be "absurd" to conclude the federal law only bars lawsuits over injuries in the United States and not Mexico's allegations over the trafficking of guns to Mexican criminals.

He said it was too much of a reach for Mexico to sue the companies over gun sales that were legal in the United States to wholesalers who in turn sold them to retailers before criminals smuggled them.

"They would have to argue that Congress intended for this robust statute to apply if an independent criminal actor shot somebody in San Diego, but not if he slips over the border and shoots somebody in Tijuana," Lelling said.

Alejandro Celorio, the Mexican foreign ministry's legal counsel, said the court's resolution would likely take weeks, and noted that the complexity of the case made a nuanced, rather than a simple "yes or no" ruling more likely in the end.

Speaking in a video conference, Celorio said if the court ruled against Mexico, the government would likely appeal. A negotiated settlement was "always an option", he added, but stressed Mexico had no plans to change its strategy for now.

U.S. gun makers urge judge to throw out Mexico's $10 billion lawsuit
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
Elephan Mann
Elephan Mann Apr 12, 2022 4:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I suppose they will be sueing the Guatemalan government for helping distribute automatic weapons such as machine guns to the cartels as well. This lawsuit will never pass Supreme Court.
jason xx
jason xx Apr 12, 2022 3:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I agree these companies should not be manufacturing all this excess weaponry. It is a bad as pharmaceutical companies manufacturing all the extra opioids.
gab nea
gab nea Apr 12, 2022 7:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
wow, it takes Mexico to do what the gun free states have not been able to do so far. Stopping the manufacturers insure the product they make, the chain of custody, does not allow guns where there is restrictions. Sue them till they are broke. they are wreaking havoc in our communities.
its private
its private Apr 12, 2022 7:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
so inanimate objects are causing all this havoc not people but objects, sounds about right. no need for personal accountability.
its private
its private Apr 12, 2022 7:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
so inanimate objects are causing all this havoc not people but objects, sounds about right. no need for personal accountability.
John Hat
John Hat Apr 12, 2022 7:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Sounds like a CNNLIBTARRD.
Elephan Mann
Elephan Mann Apr 12, 2022 7:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Imagine being this small minded and low IQ.
Elephan Mann
Elephan Mann Apr 12, 2022 7:10AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Mexico has done nothing, just as your liberal states have done nothing. Anyone can bring a lawsuit. It will never survive the Supreme Court.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email