Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started

Fed to consider tougher rules for midsize banks after SVB collapse-source

Stock Markets Mar 14, 2023 09:15PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The U.S. Federal Reserve building is pictured in Washington, March 18, 2008. REUTERS/Jason Reed/File Photo

By Pete Schroeder

(Reuters) -The Federal Reserve is considering tougher rules and oversight for midsize banks similar in size to Silicon Valley Bank, which collapsed suddenly last week, according to a source familiar with the matter.

The bank's collapse set off fears across the financial system, drove an extraordinary government effort to reassure depositors and backstop the system, and set off debate about reversing previous rule easing for regional banks.

Now, a review of the $209 billion bank's failure being conducted by Fed Vice Chair for Supervision Michael Barr could lead to strengthened rules on banks in the $100 billion to $250 billion range, the source told Reuters.

That review of Fed supervision and regulation of the bank will be released by May 1, and augments a review of bank capital rules by Barr already underway.

The Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday the Fed was reconsidering regulations regarding midsize banks, which could lead to more stringent capital and liquidity requirements and potentially beefed up annual "stress tests."

Currently, the toughest capital and liquidity requirements are reserved for the nation's largest banks, after a 2018 deregulation law from Congress and Fed rule-making under prior leadership eased those rules for smaller firms. Larger firms also face more frequent and rigorous stress testing and accounting requirements.

All those requirements could be reworked by the Fed in the aftermath of the collapse, which has also spurred fresh calls from proponents of tougher rules for regulators to rebuild those restrictions.

On Tuesday, 50 Democratic lawmakers, including Senator Elizabeth Warren, introduced a bill to repeal the law that eased rules for banks in 2018.

Fed to consider tougher rules for midsize banks after SVB collapse-source
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (4)
Derick Lim
Derick Lim Mar 14, 2023 9:52PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
IB analyts claimed Feds interest hike cause SVB and Signature collapse........ even spreading FEAR of more banks collapse if Feds raise 50 bsp .....seems the banks are squeezing Feds balls.......
William Smith
William Smith Mar 14, 2023 9:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Gee, they've only had since 2009 to do such. But the last new legislation was supposed to stop these failures. What happened to the stress texts? All smoke and mirrors.
Adrian White
Adrian White Mar 14, 2023 9:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The last legislation that you refer to was killed by Trump and his deregulation spree.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Mar 14, 2023 9:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Trump raised the requirement for stress tests from banks with $50B in deposits to $250B. CEO of SVB lobbied for this change.
Tom Saltzman
Tom Saltzman Mar 14, 2023 8:07PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The first thing they should do is raise the reserve rate back to 10% from Zero.
JIM VETTER
JIM VETTER Mar 14, 2023 7:57PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Interesting since the CEO of SVB was a former Fed board member and got his buddies to raise the the deposits threshold for more stringent rules. This likely contributed to the failure. It's the same old game, the foxes in charge of the henhouse and the peons end up holding the bag
JIM VETTER
JIM VETTER Mar 14, 2023 7:57PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
at some point the feudal system will cause a global uprising. I hope it's soon
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email