Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Fed says U.S. banks can weather severe downturn comfortably

Published 06/23/2022, 04:32 PM
Updated 06/23/2022, 09:24 PM
© Reuters. The exterior of the Marriner S. Eccles Federal Reserve Board Building is seen in Washington, D.C., U.S., June 14, 2022. REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger

By Pete Schroeder and Michelle Price

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The largest U.S. banks on Thursday easily cleared the Federal Reserve's annual health check, in a vote of confidence for the sector amid signs the U.S. economy could tip into a recession in the months ahead.

The results of the Fed's annual "stress test" exercise showed the banks have enough capital to to weather a severe economic downturn and paves the way for them to issue share buybacks and pay dividends.

The 34 lenders with more than $100 billion in assets that the Fed oversees would suffer a combined $612 billion in losses under a hypothetical severe downturn, the central bank said.

But that would still leave them with roughly twice the amount of capital required under its rules.

As a result, banks including JPMorgan Chase (NYSE:JPM), Bank of America (NYSE:BAC), Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC), Citigroup (NYSE:C), Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) and Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) can use their excess capital to issue dividends and buybacks to shareholders. Those plans can be announced after the close of trading on Monday.

"We view this as about as positive for the big banks as one could expect from the annual stress test," Jaret Seiberg, an analyst with Cowen Washington Research Group, said in a research note. "Banks didn't just perform well. The test showed they could weather a severe downturn with plunging commercial real estate and equity values and surging unemployment levels."

The country's largest banking group hailed the results as a sign of the sector's strong financial health. But Sherrod Brown, the Democratic chair of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, criticized the exercise as not rigorous enough.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Under the annual stress test exercise established following the 2007-2009 financial crisis, the Fed assesses how banks' balance sheets would fare against a hypothetical severe economic downturn. The results dictate how much capital banks need to be healthy and how much they can return to shareholders.

While the 2022 scenarios were devised before Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the current hyper-inflationary outlook, they should give investors and policymakers comfort that the country's banks are well-prepared for what economists warn is a potential U.S. recession later this year or next.

The 34 banks suffered heavy losses in this year's scenario, which saw the economy contract 3.5%, driven in part by a slump in commercial real estate asset values, and the jobless rate jumping to 10%. But even then, the Fed said aggregate bank capital ratios were still roughly twice the minimum amount required by regulators.

STRONG SHOWING

In 2020 the Fed scrapped the "pass-fail" test model and introduced a more nuanced, bank-specific capital regime.

The test assesses whether banks would stay above the required minimum 4.5% capital ratio - a measure of the cushion banks have to absorb potential losses. Banks that perform well typically stay well above that.

The average capital ratio for the 34 banks was 9.7%, the Fed said. That compares with 10.6% last year, when the Fed tested 23 lenders against a slightly easier scenario.

The average ratio for the country's eight "globally systemically important banks," or GSIBs, under the test was 9.64%, according to a Reuters analysis of the results.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Shares in Bank of America, which had the lowest ratio of the GSIBs at 7.6%, slipped in after hours trading, as did shares in Citigroup, whose ratio stood at 8.6.%. Shares in State Street (NYSE:STT), whose ratio came in at 13.2%, jumped slightly.

Foreign banks U.S. units aced the test, with the average capital ratio for the seven tested coming in at 15.2%.

Overall, regional lender Huntington Bancshares Incorporated (NASDAQ:HBAN) had the lowest ratio at 6.8%, while Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBKGn)'s U.S. operations had the highest ratio at 22.8%.

The test also sets each bank's "stress capital buffer," an extra capital cushion on top of the regulatory minimum, the size of which is determined by each bank's hypothetical losses under the test. The Fed will announce those buffers in the coming months.

Credit Suisse bank analysts this week estimated the average stress capital buffer for big banks will rise to 3.3% from 3.2% in 2021, with the range between 2.5% and 6.3%. The amount of capital lenders will redistribute to shareholders in 2022 will decline roughly 10% from a year earlier, Credit Suisse said.

See an EXPLAINER on the stress tests here:

Latest comments

This report is coming from the people that said infation was temporary until it reached 9% slithering lies over lies or plain incompetence this report to be flushed down the feds endless money pit
us inflation jan 22 7.5%  may 22 8.6% ITS THE PUTINFLATION DEMRATS....i have to repeat myself 100x so people hopefully believe my bullsh9t and the lies of my party...hey nancy how is insider trading going...you think its ok yes ofc..... let them eat cake
That’s how out of touch these people are or how stupid they think you are Banks can handle it comfortably who in their right mind thought that would be OK and good thing to say right now
We are literally playing out the 1918 Spanish Flu events to the T with how the government has handled Covid.
Adam smith, for some reason it wont let me respond on the post. But this is the most historically relevant event to today. Literally identical
all the things said before a full blown recession.. when will fed understand that the market is recovering from the pandemic..and almost all of the noise and disruptions in inflation today comes from the war in Ukraine and the strains in global food and energy.. so raising rates.. only adds to an already challenging scenario.. crash and burn more than soft landing sadly.. just feel skeptical
I totalty disagree with you. Are you saying everytime gov printed more $ & we got into this high inflation? Do you have any historical event to support?
Ahhh, 2000 dot com bust, 2008 bank and housing crisis, and my absolute favorite to describe what we are going through, is the 1918 Spanish Flu where to save the economy they had to take us off the gold standard and to fiat to print an ungodly amount of money, if i remember correctly, it was only 42% of total money supply printed. what happened? Recession, recovery, recession, depression and then recovery after WW because the US controlled the means of production. Can you guess where we are at now?
Trump and Biden doubled the money supply in two months Trump created more money than since the signing of the constitution and those are all facts
The soft landing is starting to sound like transitory.
Okay so banking stocks gonna crash
Like inflation was transitory?
Thats great the banks can handle it, we never thought otherwise. BUT....what about the people? Oh....right.
shall I sell my bear stearns Jim ?
meaning rough weather for banks with some going belly up.
I do not trust in FED, saying something now and later changing everything
so major bank collapse got it
sounds like feds are not representing the situation correctly 🤔......
Well...when you borrow money from the Fed at nearly 0% for a couple of years and pump it into the market for crazy gains, post-COVID, and loan THAT money to the general population at 2%+, I guess it makes a downturn a little easier to navigate...doesn't it?
Oh really?? Since when & why?
They also said inflation was transitory.
Who believes this nonsense?
Thanks 👍
lol ok, new ATHs soon I guess.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.