Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

FAA chief acknowledges agency, Boeing made mistakes on 737 MAX

Published 06/17/2020, 07:04 AM
Updated 06/18/2020, 01:19 AM
© Reuters. Steve Dickson, Administrator of the FAA, speaks at the UK Aviation Club in London

By David Shepardson and Eric M. Johnson

(Reuters) - The head of the Federal Aviation Administration, Steve Dickson, acknowledged on Wednesday that Boeing (NYSE:BA) Co and the U.S. air safety agency both made mistakes on the 737 MAX jet, but rejected senators' accusations the FAA was "stonewalling" probes after two fatal crashes.

Boeing's 737 MAX has been grounded since March 2019 following crashes in Indonesia and Ethiopia that killed 346 people, triggering multiple investigations into how the plane was certified as safe.

In a particularly tense exchange at a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on aircraft certification, Senator Ted Cruz accused Dickson of speaking in the passive voice as a way of "avoiding responsibility" after Dickson told him, "Mistakes were made."

"So unknown somebodies made unspecified mistakes for which there were no repercussions," Cruz said. "What mistakes were made and who made them?"

After a pause, Dickson said, "The manufacturer made mistakes and the FAA made mistakes in its oversight." Dickson then referred to Boeing's development of a flight control system that repeatedly pushed down the jet's nose in both crashes as pilots battled to gain control. "The full implications of the flight control system were not understood as design changes were made," he said.

One senator at the hearing said the agency was like "a dog watching TV" when it came to policing Boeing's work, and another said the agency was "stonewalling" the committee's investigation into the 737 MAX's development.

"Your team at the FAA has attempted deliberately to keep us in the dark," Senator Roger Wicker, the Republican committee chairman, told Dickson.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Dickson told Wicker he was "totally committed to the oversight process."

"I believe it is inaccurate to portray the agency as unresponsive," Dickson said, pointing to its cooperation in multiple investigations. "There is still ongoing work."

After the hearing, an FAA official said the agency has provided "more than 7,400 pages of responsive materials" to the committee and that some material was restricted by international rules on crash investigations.

Boeing declined to comment.

The hearing came a day after Wicker and Senator Maria Cantwell, the ranking Democrat on the committee, introduced bipartisan legislation that would strengthen FAA oversight of Boeing's designs.

The crashes and Boeing's long-delayed efforts to win regulatory approval to return the 737 MAX to commercial service plunged the Chicago-based company into its worst-ever crisis, since compounded by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Aircraft Safety and Certification Reform Act of 2020, introduced on Tuesday, would give the FAA new authority to hire or remove Boeing employees conducting FAA certification tasks, and grant new whistleblower protections to employees.

Dickson told Cantwell he did not think it would improve safety if the FAA appointed the certification employees, but agreed to look at the Senate proposal.

He also told lawmakers there were many items in the legislation "that are exactly on point," including a provision that would authorize $150 million over 10 years for new FAA training and to hire specialized personnel.

Michael Stumo, whose daughter died in the Ethiopia crash, which came five months after the crash in Indonesia, applauded such reforms but told lawmakers the bill did not go far enough. Stumo demanded that manufacturers be subjected to a tougher certification process when they introduce an aircraft derived from models certified years before. The 737 MAX, for example, was derived from a plane first developed in the 1960s.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"The first crash should not have happened," Stumo said. "The second crash is inexcusable."

Latest comments

what does this mean for the share price?
Show me a ..... that has made no errors , and I will show you a newborn.
Still would have helped if the pilots had backed off of Full Throttle at any point in the 6 minute flight. They failed also.
In a undocumented system they did not know about? can you even imagine the terror they went through? it's Only the fault of greedy Boing and the system failure in FAA
True Boeing hide that from Pilot aswell, they didnt clarify to pilot or someone else concentrated more to beat AIRBUS instead of lives
ohh yeah let's blame the dead pilots, that'll help a lot not to loose lives in the future. so these companies making billions can just rush to make more cash despite the consequences of their actions. i like how with such companies or governments mistakes seem to be always "orphans".
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.