Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

U.S. EPA shoots to push vehicle fuel efficiency to 52 mpg by 2026

Published 08/05/2021, 04:57 PM
Updated 08/05/2021, 06:06 PM
© Reuters. Commuters navigate early morning traffic as they drive towards downtown in Los Angeles, California, U.S., July 22, 2019.    REUTERS/Mike Blake/Files

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Joe Biden's administration on Thursday said it would propose reversing the Trump-era loosening of vehicle emissions rules with a new plan to boost efficiency 10% in the 2023 model year and aiming for a fleet average of 52 miles per gallon by 2026.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency proposal also calls for a near 5% stringency increase in each model year from 2024 through 2026. But it would not seek to reverse former President Donald Trump's rollbacks in fuel efficiency standards for the 2021 or 2022 model years.

The plan is a big increase from Trump's proposal for vehicle fuel efficiency by 2026 of just 43.3 mpg. The Biden administration said EPA rules would require higher efficiency by 2026 than former President Barack Obama's administration would have mandated through 2025.

The Democratic administrations of Biden and Obama have pushed for stricter fuel efficiency standards to reduce greenhouse gas omissions and fight climate change. In March 2020, Trump's Republican administration rolled back Obama's standards to require only 1.5% annual increases in efficiency through 2026. Obama had required 5% annual increases.

The EPA said through the 2026 model year "the new vehicle fleet likely will continue to consist primarily of gasoline-fueled vehicles." It estimates electric vehicles and plug-in hybrid electric will account for 8% of new U.S. vehicle sales by 2026.

The EPA projects the requirements will cost $150 billion to $240 billion through 2025 from higher vehicle costs, but save motorists $120 billion to $250 billion in fuel costs and have net benefits of $86 billion to $140 billion including other things like improved public health and reduced pollution.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

EPA said by 2050 the proposal would "reduce gasoline consumption by more than 290 million barrels" a nearly 10% reduction.

In 2020, the EPA said the Trump plan would hike U.S. oil consumption by about 500,000 barrels per day.

The EPA assumes that under the rule Americans will drive 449 billion more miles, up 0.5% as the costs of driving declines due to the improvement in fuel economy,

EPA estimates that over 30 years "total

fatalities will increase by 2,288, with 1,952 deaths attributed to increased driving and 336 deaths attributed to the increase in fatality risk."

The transportation sector is the largest U.S. source of greenhouse emissions, representing 29% of total emissions -- and light-duty vehicles account for 58% of the transportation emissions.

The EPA also proposes to restore the advanced technology vehicle multiplier credits "to encourage manufacturers to accelerate the introduction of zero and near-zero emissions vehicles" and restore the 2012 rule’s "full-size pickup truck incentives for strong hybrids" through 2025.

It would also boost "off-cycle" credits that recognize the emissions benefits of technologies that are not captured on the EPA compliance tests. "These include technologies such as

high-efficiency headlamps or solar reflective paint that keeps the vehicle cabin cooler to reduce air conditioning needs," EPA said.

EPA plans a public hearing on Aug. 25 and public comments must be received by Sept. 27.

Latest comments

money
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.