Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

US accuses investment firm, anesthesia company of Texas monopoly scheme

Published 09/21/2023, 05:51 PM
Updated 09/21/2023, 06:36 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Chair Lina Khan listens during a a hearing on "Oversight of the Federal Trade Commission," on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., July 13, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Wurm/File Photo

By Mike Scarcella

(Reuters) - The Federal Trade Commission on Thursday sued U.S. Anesthesia Partners and a private equity firm in Texas federal court, accusing them in a novel legal complaint of restricting competition to drive up prices for patients.

The agency's lawsuit in Houston federal court said health and technology-focused private equity firm Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe led a "roll-up strategy" of buying out anesthesia practices in Texas. This made physician-owned U.S. Anesthesia Partners (USAP), which it created more than a decade ago, the dominant provider in the state, the FTC said.

Biden-appointed FTC Chair Lina Khan had vowed to examine what she said was the "growing influence" of private equity on competition and consumer protection. The agency enforces antitrust law, and the lawsuit was seen as the first litigated case over a private equity firm's consolidation strategy.

"The FTC will continue to scrutinize and challenge serial acquisitions, roll-ups, and other stealth consolidation schemes that unlawfully undermine fair competition and harm the American public," Khan said in a statement on Thursday.

U.S. Anesthesia Partners raised each new purchased group's rates, forcing patients to pay more for the same doctor than before, according to the lawsuit.

In a statement, U.S. Anesthesia Partners denied the FTC's allegations and said it competes with large and small groups and individual anesthesiologists across Texas. The company said it "will vigorously defend itself against the FTC's misguided allegations."

The group said its reimbursements for anesthesia services are consistent with industry practice.

Welsh Carson in a statement said it was disappointed in the FTC's unwarranted case and accused them of "using litigation to pursue radical policy theories."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

U.S. Anesthesia Partners' largest presence is in Texas, according to the FTC, and it operates in seven other states, including Florida.

The 106-page lawsuit said it was seeking a permanent injunction against "similar and related conduct."

The trade commission in a statement said U.S. Anesthesia Partners' "dominance has cost Texans tens of millions of dollars more each year in anesthesia services than before USAP was created."

The case is Federal Trade Commission v. U.S. Anesthesia Partners Inc and Welsh, Carson, Anderson & Stowe et al, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, No. 4:23-cv-03560.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.