Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Uber drives up prices for shared rides, Chicago data reveals

Stock Markets Nov 26, 2019 05:42PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Uber's logo is displayed on a mobile phone in London

By Tina Bellon

(Reuters) - How much ride-hailing companies Uber and Lyft charge customers throughout a day is one of the most closely held secrets in Silicon Valley.

But a law in Chicago requiring the companies to disclose fare data shines a light on how at least one of the former "unicorns" is trying to turn a profit for the first time.

A Reuters analysis of the data shows fares for shared rides in the city have risen significantly over the past year, while fares for single riders have remained stable.

The price increases for shared rides predominantly affect Chicago's low-income neighborhoods, which is where most of the carpool rides are booked, the analysis showed. Over this period of increased fares, carpool ridership fell.

For a graphic on Shared rides decline in Chicago as prices rise, click

The Chicago data does not differentiate between rides operated by Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) Inc, Lyft Inc (NASDAQ:LYFT), or smaller ride-share rival Via. Data by Second Measure, which tracks credit card expenditures, estimates that Uber commands a roughly 72% market share in Chicago. The data also does not indicate whether similar strategies are being rolled out in other cities.

The fare changes in Chicago show an attempt to reduce discounts for customers in order to help convince investors that ride-hailing can be a profitable business model.

But the shift comes with political risks, as cities from Chicago to London take ride-hailing companies to task over congestion, driver treatment and passenger rights. On Monday, regulators in London stripped Uber's license for the second time in just over two years, pending an appeal, over a "pattern of failures" on safety and security.

After reviewing the findings from the Chicago data, Uber said it has traditionally seen losses in its shared Pool rides segment. Earlier this month, Chief Executive Dara Khosrowshahi said Uber was "losing significant sums" due to heavy discounts on those rides.

"We want Pool to be available to as many people and in as many cities as possible, and to do that it has to be financially sustainable for years to come" through measures including pricing and better algorithms to find more pool riders, an Uber spokesman said.

Lyft declined to comment on its pricing strategy, but said shared rides have increased access to affordable and reliable transportation, particularly in neighborhoods under served by public transit and passed over by taxis.

Lyft said that given Uber controls nearly two-thirds of the Chicago market, the data most closely reflected Uber's strategy, and noted its own data did not show a decrease in shared rides.

Via, the smallest Chicago player almost exclusively focused on shared rides with an estimated 1% market share, also declined to comment on pricing but said its own interpretation of the Chicago data was consistent with the analysis.

"In city after city, we have seen that there is far more price sensitivity with pooled rides than with private, single passenger ones," Via said, adding that it was crucial for fees and taxes on shared rides to stay low in order to decrease congestion. 

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot has proposed taxes on ride-hailing services to combat congestion, by increasing the tax for solo trips and lowering taxes on shared rides. She also is pushing a new surcharge of $1.75 on weekday rides in the downtown area.

Chicago's city council on Tuesday approved the congestion tax changes as part of the city's 2020 budget.

Uber and Lyft, which have supported congestion taxes in New York and other cities, are fighting Lightfoot's congestion proposal, calling it unfair for not including regular taxi services and disproportionately hurting lower-income residents.

They also said Lightfoot's measure helps some of the city's richest parts in the north, dominated by white residents, while hurting predominantly black and Hispanic residents on the South and West Side.

Lightfoot, Chicago's first female African-American mayor, has rejected those claims, accusing Uber of stirring up racial tensions in opposition to the proposal.

Uber and Lyft put forward an alternative taxation plan that was rejected by the city as doing too little to ease downtown congestion. Uber in a statement said it wished Chicago would remove fees on shared rides altogether.

The Reuters analysis of more than one million Chicago rides between January and September 2019 - the only full quarters for which the city currently makes data available - found that fares per mile increased 13% for shared rides. But they remained unchanged for private rides. 

Shared rides fell to about a third of all rides in a group of the least affluent neighborhoods of Chicago in the third quarter from about half of rides in the first.  

Presented with Reuters' pricing analysis, city representatives said they interpreted the data as an attempt by the companies to change customer behavior.   

"We have real concerns about the claims these companies make because actually they're the ones causing the pain to the communities in terms of cost, not the mayor's plan," said Rosa Escareno, Chicago's Commissioner of Business Affairs and Consumer Protection who led the congestion policy.

Uber declined to directly comment on the city's allegations, but said it made no sense that passengers in a solo taxi ride downtown will pay no tax while those taking a shared trip far from downtown will.

Lyft said the Mayor "is attempting to distract from what her plan will do: backtrack on her campaign promises and raise the cost of transportation in Chicago for communities who can least afford it."

Uber drives up prices for shared rides, Chicago data reveals

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email