Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Texas federal judge blocks updated fair lending rules

Published 03/29/2024, 09:52 PM
Updated 03/29/2024, 10:55 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Dollar notes are seen in this June 22, 2017 illustration photo.   REUTERS/Thomas White/Illustration

By Nate Raymond

(Reuters) - A federal judge in Texas on Friday blocked enforcement of new regulations adopted during the Biden administration that sought to overhaul how lenders extend loans and other services to low- and moderate-income Americans.

U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Amarillo, Texas, sided with banking and business groups including the American Bankers Association and U.S. Chamber of Commerce in finding the new rules ran afoul of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.

The judge, an appointee of Republican former President Donald Trump, issued a preliminary injunction blocking their enforcement before they could take effect Monday. The agencies and trade groups did not respond to requests for comment.

The Federal Reserve, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and Office of the Comptroller of the Currency last year updated their rules enforcing the 1977 fair lending law, which seeks to ensure banks lend in their local communities.

Conceived to prevent red lining - a discriminatory practice where banks refuse or offer only limited lending to certain areas or populations, primarily minorities - CRA regulations gauge how well banks service areas where they operate.

The new rules broadened the geographies in which lenders were be required to extend loans and other services to low-income Americans, a change regulators said was needed to reflect the rise of online banking and the decline of bank branches.

But Kacsmaryk agreed with the business and banking groups who had sued in February in finding the new regulations went beyond what the 1977 law authorized.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

He said the rules went too far by allowing banks be assessed not just in the geographic areas they maintain physical branches but also in other areas in which they conduct retail lending and by allowing the regulators to assess the availability of a bank’s deposit products, not just credit, in a community.

Kacsmaryk said the agencies never before claimed authority to assess banks wherever they conducted retail lending. "On the contrary, they have — since 1978 — limited themselves to areas surrounding deposit-taking facilities," he said.

Kacsmaryk is the lone active judge in Amarillo, helping make his courthouse a favored venue for conservative litigants challenging federal government policies during President Joe Biden's administration.

He gained national attention last year when he suspended approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. The U.S. Supreme Court has allowed the pill to remain on the market while it considers the case, which it heard arguments in on Tuesday.

The U.S. Judicial Conference, the judiciary's policymaking body, earlier this month adopted a discretionary policy that aims to ensure cases challenging laws are randomly assigned judges and cannot be "judge shopped" by litigants to sympathetic jurists in single-judge courts.

(This story has been refiled to fix the link to the ruling in paragraph 3)

Latest comments

amazing that they want banks to do exactly what caused the last housing crash.
Ridiculous block. Not forcing banks to lend equally within their realm is needed to ensure fair practice. Banks can always deny loans based on meeting credit worthiness standards. This is just anti-Biden wrangling.
The result will be the banks good customers left to subsidize bad customers. The only role of government is to allow competitive markets, which they don’t when it comes to banking.
That's true
ski, not true at all. good credit dictates interest rate of loan. also, banks buy and sell loans all the time gambling on whether loan gets paid. think back to 2008. this judge's ruling will be over-ruled by higher courts.
hello
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.