Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Access the Market Tools Trusted by Thousands of Investors Get Started

Talk of a New Wells Fargo CEO Swirls; Be Skeptical

Published Mar 21, 2019 01:54PM ET Updated Mar 21, 2019 03:05PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters.
 
GS
+1.01%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
WFC
+0.12%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Charley Blaine

Investing.com - If you're into who's in and who's out among the nation's big banks, today is a catnip kind of day.

The New York Post reported today that directors of Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) were talking to Harvey Schwartz, a former top executive at Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS), about taking over from current CEO Tim Sloan.

Sloan, CEO since 2016, is under pressure from regulators, who don't think the nation's fourth-largest bank is making enough progress getting over the scandals that roiled it in the last few years. That included opening sham accounts and assessing customers fees for services they didn't know about and didn't want, charging higher fees to African-American and Latino borrowers with similar credit profiles as white customers and a computer error that cost hundreds of borrowers their homes in the financial crisis.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, the Massachusetts Democrat running for president, said she believes Sloan should resign.

It is true that Wells Fargo's fourth-quarter earnings of $1.21 a share beat estimates of analysts polled by Investing.com. But that was after missing estimates for two quarters. Revenue has been steady over the last year. And the $1.11 forecast for fiscal first-quarter earnings is a penny below last year's $1.12.

The stock may be up 8.5% this year, but it is flat on the month and trading 16% below its 52-week high reached last summer. It fell 24% in 2018. It was off slightly on Thursday because of a different problem: the impact of the Federal Reserve's decision not to raise interest rates on banking profits.

Which brings us back to Schwartz, former chief operating officer at Goldman who lost out on the top post to David Solomon.

He's not talking about any discussions with Wells Fargo. There may be another candidate, which the Post said it couldn't name. And Wells Fargo denied there were any talks with anyone.

Even if Schwartz is talking to Wells Fargo, it's not clear he wants the job. Wells Fargo is based in San Francisco and has a major headquarters in Charlotte, N.C., and, the Post story said, he doesn't want to live in either place. And he is supposedly thinking about running a family investment office.

Then there's how much money Wells Fargo would have to pay to get an outsider to make a move to either place palatable. Sloan made nearly $18 million in salary and stock grants in 2018. Presumably, Schwartz would cost more -- much more. And you would have to get the regulators (the Comptroller of the Currency and the Federal Reserve) and the Wells Fargo critics to sign on.

Plus, the situation is risky, given all of Wells Fargo's issues.

"When you replace a CEO in an institution that has issues and crisis -- and is in the news in a bad way -- it's a very, very difficult search," Jeanne Branthover, a managing partner at executive search firm DHR International, told Bloomberg last month.

Talk of a New Wells Fargo CEO Swirls; Be Skeptical
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Lynn McCord
the907man Mar 21, 2019 5:43PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Wells Fargo are lap dogs for the Feds. They are not fiduciaries to their customers. One time I was depositing $500 into my account there, and the teller actually asked me "where I got the money". Seriously.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email