Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Some U.S. companies will keep small business loans, defying backlash

Published 04/24/2020, 08:52 PM
Updated 04/24/2020, 09:15 PM
© Reuters. A woman runs on a nearly empty street in the coronavirus outbreak near the Treasury Department in Washington

By Hilary Russ and Joshua Franklin

(Reuters) - Several publicly listed companies worth hundreds of millions of dollars said on Friday they had no plans to return funding they received under a U.S. government program providing emergency loans to small businesses, even though some of their peers have started to do so.

The loans are designed to support smaller businesses - defined as having no more than 500 employees - ranging from hair dressers to landscapers to help cover employee payroll and rent, as large swaths of the economy have been shut down to keep the coronavirus from spreading.

The U.S. Treasury Department said on Thursday that "big public companies with access to capital" would have a hard time proving they really needed the coronavirus relief funds, dubbed Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans. It updated its eligibility criteria, and gave companies that do not qualify until May 7 to return the aid.

A handful of big public companies, some of which had qualified under a loophole in the program that defined the 500-employee limit to each location operated by a single company, responded to the public backlash by saying they were returning their loans. That included Ruth's Hospitality Group Inc (O:RUTH), owner of the Chris Steakhouse chain, investment firm Manning & Napier Inc (N:MN) and biotechnology company Wave Life Sciences Ltd (O:WVE). Restaurant operators Shake Shack Inc (N:SHAK) and Kura Sushi USA Inc (O:KRUS) returned loans from an initial tranche of the program.

But others are holding fast.

MiMedx Group Inc (PK:MDXG), a manufacturer of biomaterials with a market value of $420 million, Digimarc Corp (O:DMRC), a digital watermark provider with a market value of $197 million, and ZAGG Inc (O:ZAGG), a maker of screen protectors for mobile devices with a market value of just shy of $100 million, told Reuters on Friday they took the loans because they needed them and planned to keep them.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

MiMedx, which took a $10 million loan, said it was in compliance with the Treasury's loans and could not access the capital markets because it was not current in its financial statements.

"COVID-19 has created operating complexities many never imagined. From sourcing material, to guarding our staff's health and maintaining high quality production standards," MiMedx said in a statement.

Digimarc, which took a $5 million loan, said it complied with both the guidelines and the spirit of the program. "We don't know whether the capital markets are open to us until we go there," CEO Bruce Davis said.

ZAGG, which took a $9.5 million loan, said it qualified because it met all conditions.

"With extensive retail closures nationwide, our business has been severely impacted during the shutdown of all non-essential businesses due to COVID-19. We are using the money in accordance with government guidelines," Zagg said in a statement.

A Treasury spokesman declined comment.

"The risk that these companies run is that they become the poster child for greed," said Chas Hermann, the former chief brand officer at Noodles & Co (O:NDLS) who is now a marketing consultant. "Shake Shack recognized that quickly and turned it around. It was the best move you could make after you made a really bad move."

There is more loan money coming. President Donald Trump signed a new $484 billion aid bill on Friday, the fourth passed by lawmakers to address the coronavirus crisis to fund small businesses and hospitals. It includes $310 billion for PPP loans.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

The companies thst keep the money should be prosecuted for fraud as the program is not designed for companies as listed above.Even the companies that return the monies should be prosecuted for fraud.When a bank robber gives the money back they still get prosecuted so why should these frauds go un punished
But they didn't do anything wrong, if they fill out the form and got approved, that meant they qualified.
My question is, how did the government manage to ****up administration of this program so that these corporations were able to get the money in the first place? To your analogy of bank robbers, at least banks have security measures and processes in place to minimize robbery. I agree the money should be repaid, and the corporations refusing to give it back should be prosecuted. But not the companies who returned it. It's not quite stealing when it's being given away so freely.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.