Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Sarah Palin set to battle New York Times at defamation trial

Stock MarketsJan 23, 2022 06:30PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Former vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin speaks while campaigning for U.S. Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore at the Historic Union Station Train Shed in Montgomery, Alabama, U.S., September 21, 2017. REUTERS/Tami Chappell

By Jonathan Stempel and Helen Coster

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Sarah Palin, the former Alaska governor and 2008 Republican vice presidential nominee, has spent 4-1/2 years battling the New York Times over an editorial she said falsely linked her to a deadly Arizona mass shooting that left a U.S. congresswoman seriously wounded.

On Monday, Palin is poised to try to begin convincing jurors in a lawsuit in Manhattan federal court that the newspaper and its former editorial page editor James Bennet defamed her.

The trial before U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff marks a rare instance of a major media company defending its editorial practices before an American jury. Opening statements could take place as soon as Monday, following jury selection.

Palin bears the high burden of showing by clear and convincing evidence that there was "actual malice" involved in the newspaper's editorial writing process.

"This is a lawsuit over an editorial, essentially an opinion. This is a potentially dangerous area," said Roy Gutterman, a Syracuse University law and communications professor. "If we give public officials a green light to litigate on editorials they disagree with, where's the end?"

Palin, 57, has accused the Times of defaming her in a June 14, 2017, editorial linking her political action committee (PAC) to the 2011 mass shooting in an Arizona parking lot that left six people dead and then-U.S. Representative Gabby Giffords wounded. Palin is seeking unspecified damages, but according to court papers has estimated $421,000 in damage to her reputation.

The editorial said "the link to political incitement was clear" in the 2011 shooting, and that the incident came after Palin's PAC circulated a map putting 20 Democrats including Giffords under "stylized cross hairs."

It was published after a shooting in Alexandria, Virginia in which U.S. Representative Steve Scalise, a member of the House of Representatives Republican leadership, was wounded.

Palin objected to language that Bennet had added to a draft prepared by a Times colleague. She said the added material fit Bennet's "preconceived narrative," and as an "experienced editor" he knew and understood the meaning of his words.

The Times quickly corrected the editorial to disclaim any connection between political rhetoric and the Arizona shooting, and Bennet has said he did not intend to blame Palin.

Bennet's "immediate sort of emergency mode or panic mode" upon learning what happened strongly suggests he had been unaware of any mistake, said Benjamin Zipursky, a Fordham University law professor.

"Negligence or carelessness - even gross negligence - is clearly not good enough for Palin to win," Zipursky said.

SUPREME COURT PRECEDENT

It has been 58 years since the U.S. Supreme Court adopted the "actual malice" standard in the landmark decision called New York Times v. Sullivan, which made it difficult for public figures to win libel lawsuits.

Two current justices, conservatives Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, have suggested revisiting that standard.

Palin has signaled in court papers she would challenge the Sullivan case precedent on appeal if she loses at trial.

Don Herzog, a University of Michigan law professor, said Palin would have trouble showing that the Times "subjectively doubted or disbelieved" the truth of what it presented as fact.

"In context, and given the kind of publication it was, this is a matter of opinion and so simply not actionable in defamation," Herzog said.

While the trial could spotlight office politics at the Times, the newspaper could argue that mistakes do happen under deadline pressure.

It has said that despite Palin's efforts to demonstrate its "liberal bias" and views on gun control, the editorial was never about her and did not undermine her reputation.

"Gov. Palin already was viewed as a controversial figure with a complicated history and reputation, and in the time since the editorial was published, Gov. Palin has prospered," the Times said in a Jan. 17 court filing.

The trial is expected to last five days.

Gutterman said he expects the Times to prevail.

"It's unfortunate that this happened at one of the most prominent newspapers in the county, on deadline, but even a mistake does not rise to actual malice," Gutterman said.

Sarah Palin set to battle New York Times at defamation trial
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (6)
Ac Tektrader
Ac Tektrader Jan 24, 2022 1:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
kavanSun another right-wing rationalizing misinformation and lies by the right, attacking the free-press..... with the free press there's a correction and appology. the right never apologizes they double down with more lies and misinformstion and half-truths.
Co Gonz
Co Gonz Jan 24, 2022 1:21AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You do understand that american right wing is conservative which means to conserve the constitution- attacking free prese is the opposite and something democrats do
Kaveh Sun
Kaveh Sun Jan 23, 2022 9:15PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
If the left do fake news, it is freedom if expression. Everybody elese gets banned or fined.
Corey DeLaplain
SniperSam Jan 23, 2022 7:41PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
What's even sicker is that the NYT covered up the Holocaust during WW II, the starvation of millions of Ukrainians and of course more recently pushed the phoney Russian collusion of the 2016 Truump victory. However, they didn't make a peep when ****Ted Kennedy went to the head of the KGB for help to defeat Reagan in the 1984 election! That was serious and real Russian collusion!
Ac Tektrader
Ac Tektrader Jan 23, 2022 7:41PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I see sniper sam is pushing Russian Propaganda again.
Joel Schwartz
Joel Schwartz Jan 23, 2022 6:55PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Can she see Alaska from New York?
Tom Sc
Tom Sc Jan 23, 2022 6:47PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Palin...is that one of the publications she reads? because she reads all of them...always...can't name any but she reads them all🤣🤣🤣🤣
Red Riley
Red Riley Jan 23, 2022 9:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
media and libs-- all hypocrites.
Benjamin USA
Benjamin USA Jan 23, 2022 9:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You seem triggered
Trevor Roberts
LimitUp Jan 23, 2022 9:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Benjamin USA unpaid hack
Ac Tektrader
Ac Tektrader Jan 23, 2022 9:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Trevor Roberts limit up paid hack... by the righ wingnuts.
Ac Tektrader
Ac Tektrader Jan 23, 2022 9:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Trevor Roberts redRiley loves the tin hat wouldbe despot Trump. and like Trump hates the Constitution. especially the free press.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email