Get 40% Off
🚀 AI-picked stocks soar in May. PRFT is +55%—in just 16 days! Don’t miss June’s top picks.Unlock full list

Rising opposition to CEO pay tied to 'questionable practices,' report says

Published 02/24/2022, 07:02 AM
Updated 02/24/2022, 10:42 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A boardroom is seen in an office building in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., May 24, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo
US500
-
GE
-
NCLH
-

By Ross Kerber

(Reuters) -More frequent shareholder revolts at companies like Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) Holdings and General Electric (NYSE:GE) show corporate directors should hesitate to hike CEO pay during tough times, according to a new report.

Proxy votes against executive pay at S&P 500 companies became more common last year and were often sparked by "questionable practices and metrics" like when companies eased performance targets during the COVID-19 pandemic, according to a report by As You Sow, a shareholder advocacy group focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters.

As companies begin to issue their proxy statements showing compensation details in coming months, some will have gotten the message they should not tweak formulas to leaders' advantage even if a crisis looms, said Rosanna Landis Weaver, one of the report's authors.

"Last year we could tell starkly when companies were doing these things, and shareholders responded," she said. But the unique circumstances of the pandemic mean it could be harder for investors to spot bad pay practices in the future, she added.

Among the S&P 500, a record 16 companies had the pay of their CEOs and other top leaders rejected by more than half of investors last year, up from ten in 2020 and seven in 2019, according to the report, which also used data from sustainable ratings agency HIP Investor.

In one case cited in the report, Norwegian Cruise Line paid CEO Frank Del Rio $36.4 million for 2020, more than twice the level of 2019, even as the company's business fell off during the pandemic. In May, 83% of votes cast were against the pay, a filing shows.

Via e-mail, Norwegian said the 2020 pay was meant to keep its management intact, and that it will "carefully consider" shareholder opinions as it reviews pay policies going forward.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A boardroom is seen in an office building in Manhattan, New York City, New York, U.S., May 24, 2021. REUTERS/Andrew Kelly/File Photo

In another case, General Electric granted CEO Larry Culp new shares tied to lower financial targets that made up the bulk of the $73 million he earned in 2020. In May, 58% of advisory votes cast were against Culp's pay, a filing shows.

In a statement e-mailed by a representative, Thomas Horton, GE lead director and chair of the Management Development and Compensation Committee, said "GE’s Board of Directors strongly believes the actions taken in 2020 to secure several additional years of Larry Culp’s leadership was, and remains, in the very best interest of GE and our shareholders."

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.