Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

Redstone family moves to cement control over CBS

Published 05/16/2018, 02:16 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The CBS television network logo is seen outside their offices on 6th avenue in New York

By Jessica Toonkel and Tom Hals

(Reuters) - The Redstone family sought on Wednesday to amend CBS Corp's (N:CBS) bylaws to prevent its board of directors from issuing a special stock dividend that would eliminate much of its voting power, as a court room showdown between them loomed.

The move came after National Amusements Inc (NAI), the Redstone movie theater company that controls CBS and peer Viacom Inc (O:VIAB), said in a court filing earlier on Wednesday that a CBS proposal to strip its voting control through the dividend is "invalid", and urged a judge to rule against CBS at a 2 p.m. ET hearing in Wilmington, Delaware on Wednesday.

CBS is seeking a restraining order to prevent Shari Redstone from rewriting its bylaws or sacking directors ahead of a board meeting on Thursday. It was not immediately clear how National Amusements' decision to change the bylaws, to make the dividend's approval subject to a supermajority of CBS's board of directors, would affect the court's decision.

"NAI believes the irresponsible action taken by CBS and its special committee put in motion a chain of events that poses significant risk to CBS. Due to the magnitude of this threat, NAI was compelled to take this measured step to protect its position while also mitigating further disruption to CBS," National Amusements said in a statement.

CBS had said its board was considering a special dividend that would dilute National Amusements' voting power to 17 percent from 80 percent, a move legal experts called a "nuclear option."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

In court filings on Wednesday, both sides said they were being forced to take extreme measures. National Amusements said it might have to sack the board to protect its voting power, and CBS said it might have to dilute the Redstones' voting control to prevent abuses.

National Amusements requested the Delaware court deny the restraining order and said in court papers CBS rejected an offer of a standstill agreement that required the latter to drop its plan for the special dividend.

The showdown comes as the Redstones are seeking to merge CBS and Viacom to create a company they say will be better able to compete in the media landscape that has been reshaped by the likes of video-streaming company Netflix Inc (NASDAQ:NFLX).

A CBS special board committee has resisted that deal, citing in part concerns about corporate governance of the merged company.

National Amusements said on Monday it believed CBS sought a temporary restraining order because National Amusements had raised specific concerns about incidents of bullying and intimidation by one CBS director, dating back to 2016.

On Wednesday, in its court filing, National Amusements identified that CBS board director as Charles Gifford, an independent director and member of the special committee.

"The allegations regarding him (Gifford) are not only vague and unsubstantiated, they are utterly inconsistent with our knowledge of him," CBS said in a statement.

'HOBSON'S CHOICE'

National Amusements said on Monday it did not intend to replace the board, but on Wednesday signaled that had changed. It said it was facing a "Hobson's choice": accept massive dilution or "consider taking various stockholder action to protect itself from dilution."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

If forced out, directors and management could collect large "golden parachute" payments, according to National Amusements.

CBS Chief Executive Les Moonves could collect more than $150 million and Barclays (LON:BARC) estimated the CBS management would receive $375 million in total.

CBS has said it is acting to protect shareholders and the company from abuses by Shari Redstone, who the CBS board accused of undermining management by talking to potential CEO replacements and rejecting a potential acquirer of CBS.

They cited her sacking of independent directors at Viacom, and fear similar steps at CBS.

CBS said the Redstone family was desperate to avoid allowing the Delaware court to consider if the dilution plan was an appropriate response to the Redstone actions.

The proposed dividend would not dilute the economic interests of any CBS stockholder, but would help the company to operate as an independent, non-controlled company and fully evaluate strategic alternatives, CBS has said.

Shares of CBS were down about 1 percent at $53.90 in midday trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Viacom share rose about 1.2 percent to $28.63.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.