Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

Judge in Twitter v. Musk once made rare ruling: ordering a deal to close

Published 07/15/2022, 06:06 AM
Updated 07/15/2022, 08:41 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Tesla CEO Elon Musk leaves Manhattan federal court after a hearing on his fraud settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in New York City, U.S. April 4, 2019.  REUTERS/Brendan McDermid/

By Tom Hals and Hyunjoo Jin

(Reuters) -The judge overseeing Twitter Inc (NYSE:TWTR)'s $44 billion lawsuit against Elon Musk has a no-nonsense reputation as well as the distinction of being one of the few jurists who has ever ordered a reluctant buyer to close a U.S. corporate merger.

Kathaleen McCormick (NYSE:MKC) took over the role of chancellor or chief judge of the Court of Chancery last year, the first woman in that role. On Wednesday, she was assigned the Twitter lawsuit which seeks to force Musk to complete his deal for the social media platform, which promises to be one of the biggest legal showdowns in years.

"She already has a track record of not putting up with some of the worst behavior that we see in these areas when people want to get out of deals," said Adam Badawi, a law professor who specializes in corporate governance at the University of California Berkeley. "She is a serious, no-nonsense judge."

In contrast to Musk's brash and volatile behavior, she is known as soft-spoken, approachable and amiable -- but a person who also stands her ground. She advocates respect among litigants and integrity at legal conferences.

"We've always had each other's backs, we've always gone out for drinks after arguments and maintained this level of civility," she told a gathering at the University of Delaware this year.

After weeks of confrontational tweets suggesting Twitter was hiding the true number of fake accounts, Musk said on July 8 he was terminating the $54.20-per-Twitter share acquisition, worth $44 billion. On Tuesday, the social media platform sued.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

McCormick on Friday scheduled the first hearing for July 19 in Wilmington, when she will consider Twitter's request to expedite the case and conduct a four-day trial in September.

Shares of Twitter were up about 2% to $37.11 in midday trading on Friday, but still more than 30% below the deal price.

Judges have ordered reluctant buyers to close corporate acquisitions only a handful of times, according to legal experts and court records. One of those was McCormick.

Last year, McCormick got the attention of Wall Street dealmakers by ordering an affiliate of private equity firm Kohlberg & Co LLC to close its $550 million purchase of DecoPac Holding Inc, which makes cake decorating products.

She described her ruling as "chalking up a victory for deal certainty" and rejected Kohlberg's arguments that it could walk away because of a lack of financing.

The case has many parallels to the Twitter deal. Like Musk, Kohlberg said it was walking away because DecoPac violated the merger agreement. Like Musk, Kohlberg argued in part that DecoPac failed to maintain ordinary operations.

There are also differences. Musk's deal is magnitudes bigger, involves a publicly traded target company in Twitter and might have implications for Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) Inc, the electric vehicle maker that is the source of much of Musk's fortune.

Tesla shares were trading up slightly on Friday at $718.04, down from around $1,000 when the Twitter deal was announced.

In other cases, she has come down on the side of shareholders when they clashed with management.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Last year, she prevented energy company The Williams Cos Inc from adopting a so-called poison pill anti-takeover measure, saying it breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders.

Last month, she said shareholders of Carvana Co (NYSE:CVNA) could sue the board for a direct offering of stock to select investors when the share price was depressed during the early pandemic.

A graduate of Notre Dame Law School, McCormick started her career with the Delaware branch of the Legal Aid Society, which helps low-income people navigate the court system.

She went into private practice "mainly for financial reasons," she told the Delaware Senate during her confirmation hearing, joining Young Conaway Stargatt & Taylor, one of the state's main firms for business litigation.

She joined the Court of Chancery in 2018 as a vice chancellor and became the first woman to lead the Court of Chancery last year.

Despite her mild manner, Eric Talley, who specializes in corporate law at Columbia Law School, said he doubts McCormick would be cowed by Musk.

"I would not be placing my bets on Chancellor McCormick suddenly becoming weak-kneed," he said.

Latest comments

Sounds like a change of judges is in order.
Another know-noyhing kook with no knowledge of how America works, bit plenty of ignorant opinions.
Contract enforcement is not rare.
Well, there is the judge and the appeal. If the judge thinks she will rule on a market case based upon an ideological basis, she might have a setback. Twitter just got caught in a trap.
the key is, will her ruling or judgment final? not able to allow appeal?
Appeals are likely.
Watch and see... Reuters touts this judge, but if this doesn't order the deal to close, Reuters will be bashing her. Just watch.
100%
It will be so much better for America when the paranoid third of American old farts pass away and reasonable reality based thinking returns.
Good, get his pockets
If the contract says Twitter must provide specific data as part of the acquisition requirements, not providing the data would be a breach of contract by Twitter. A judge can do nothing about that.
Tell that to the SEC.
You are entitled to your own opinion, not your own facts. You don't know what you are talking about.
they will have to give algorithms and everything we'll see you can't make someone buy when it's not disclosed
musk sadly waived his due diligence phase already and moved straight to the buying part of the deal... this is going to come back and ******him. I bet he is forced to buy twitter as well.
LOL. Musk is trapped. He will likely be forced to buy Twitter, but to defend himself, he will have to trash twitter, depressing share price. This ends with Musk buying Twitter at agreed upon price.
That's a possible scenario Brad.  If that's the case Musk may have to unload a large number of Tesla shares to finance his obligation which will have a marked impact on Tesla's share price.  Either way its the shareholders that end up paying the price for his tantrum.
They may negotiate a settlement, but that may still require Musk to raise some significant cash. But your point is correct, he gets high, makes rash decisions, and others pay the price.
He's already sold a ton of Tesla shares to fund this mania-driven decision. Either way he's paying up a significant sum.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.