Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

JPMorgan, Deutsche Bank ordered to face lawsuits over Jeffrey Epstein ties

Published 03/20/2023, 12:14 PM
Updated 03/20/2023, 03:56 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A J.P. Morgan logo is seen outside the JPMorgan bank offices in Paris, France, January 27, 2023. REUTERS/Sarah Meyssonnier

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A U.S. judge said on Monday JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM) and Deutsche Bank AG (NYSE:DB) must face lawsuits accusing them of enabling Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking.

The decision by U.S. District Judge Jed Rakoff in Manhattan could expose the banks to additional financial and reputational damage for keeping Epstein as a client, even after the late financier registered as a sex offender.

In a six-paragraph order, Rakoff said JPMorgan must face a lawsuit by the U.S. Virgin Islands accusing it of missing red flags about Epstein's abuse of women on Little St. James, a private island he owned there.

The judge also ruled that both banks must face proposed class actions by women who said Epstein sexually abused them. He said he would explain his reasoning in due course.

Rakoff's decision gives the plaintiffs a chance to prove that JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank (ETR:DBKGn) knowingly benefited from involvement in Epstein's sex trafficking.

The women can also try to show that the banks were negligent and obstructed enforcement of a federal anti-trafficking law.

Brad Edwards, a lawyer for the women, said damages in a scheduled October trial covering more than 300 Epstein victims could total billions of dollars.

The JPMorgan cases drew added attention when Jes Staley, formerly JPMorgan's private banking chief, was accused of swapping sexually suggestive messages about young women with the financier, and committing sexual assault himself.

'LANDMARK DECISION'

Both banks have said they had no legal duty to protect women from Epstein and denied accusations they knew about his abuses.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Epstein had been a client of JPMorgan from 2000 to 2013, and Deutsche Bank from 2013 to 2018.

JPMorgan spokeswoman Trish Wexler and Deutsche Bank spokesman Dylan Riddle declined to comment on Rakoff's ruling.

"It's a landmark decision," Edwards said an interview.

"To my knowledge, it's the first time a class of victims can pursue sex trafficking cases against two major financial institutions," he added. "Complicity of the banks was a necessary ingredient of Epstein's abuses, and this provides a final layer of accountability."

Carol Thomas-Jacobs, the U.S. Virgin Islands acting attorney general, in a statement said her office's case would help ensure that banks act as "a first line of defense in identifying and reporting potential human trafficking, as the law expects."

The territory previously recovered more than $105 million from Epstein's estate in a settlement in November, while about 138 Epstein accusers were in 2021 awarded more than $121 million from a compensation fund, also funded by the estate.

Epstein killed himself at age 66 in a Manhattan jail cell in August 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking.

He had pleaded guilty to a Florida state prostitution charge in 2008, and later registered as a sex offender.

STALEY DEPOSITION

The lawsuits accused JPMorgan and Deutsche Bank of turning a blind eye to Epstein's abuses because he was an important client, and letting him make numerous wire transfers to pay victims.

In its complaint, the U.S. Virgin Islands also suggested that JPMorgan Chief Executive Jamie Dimon was aware of Epstein's crimes and the bank's role in advancing them.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The plaintiff in one of the JPMorgan cases, known as Jane Doe 1, said she was a ballet dancer whom Epstein trafficked from 2006 to 2013.

In the Deutsche Bank case, the plaintiff, also known as Jane Doe 1, said Epstein sexually abused her from 2003 to 2018.

JPMorgan is separately suing Staley for concealing what he knew about Epstein, and wants him to return eight years of pay and cover losses in the other lawsuits.

Staley has admitted having been friendly with Epstein but expressed regret for the relationship and denied knowing about Epstein's alleged crimes.

He became Barclays (LON:BARC) Plc's chief executive after leaving JPMorgan, but resigned in November 2021 amid regulatory concerns about his relationship with Epstein.

Brendan Sullivan, a lawyer for Staley, did not immediately respond to requests for comment .

JPMorgan lawyers are expected to question Staley under oath on Thursday and Friday, and Edwards said he has asked Dimon to submit to questioning.

The cases in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York are: Jane Doe 1 v Deutsche Bank AG et al, No. 22-10018; Jane Doe 1 v JPMorgan Chase & Co, No. 22-10019; Government of the U.S. Virgin Islands v JPMorgan Chase Bank NA, No. 22-10904; and JPMorgan Chase Bank NA v Staley, in Nos. 22-10019 and 22-10904.

Latest comments

What a joke sue banks for crimes a bank customer has perpetrated….hungry laywers…taking advantage of women that have already been screwed by epstein. What about sewing the supermarket where he shopped or the city where he lived and comitted the atrocities..is us a banana republic
Both banks denied accusations they knew about his abuses Oh sure, sure
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.