Get 40% Off
🔥 This hedge fund gained 26.16% in the last month. Get their top stocks with our free stock ideas tool.See stock ideas

Hurdles ahead for saving Michigan nuclear power plant

Published 09/13/2022, 05:56 PM
Updated 09/13/2022, 06:00 PM
© Reuters.
PCG
-

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The governor of Michigan said last week she wants a nuclear power plant to reopen to save jobs and help curb climate change, but the company that bought the plant said there are many hurdles to save the facility.

ClearView Energy Partners, a non-partisan research group, said the process for saving the plant is "murky at best."

Holtec International bought the 805 megawatt Palisades plant in May to decommission the facility, a long and costly process.

But with a resurgence in interest in virtually-emissions free power generation, Holtec has applied for funding in a Department of Energy (DOE) program to keep the plant running.

Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer in a letter https://www.michigan.gov/whitmer/news/press-releases/2022/09/09/whitmer-announces-plan-with-holtec-to-reopen-palisades-plant last week urged U.S. Energy Secretary Jennifer Granholm - herself a former Michigan governor - to keep Palisades open to save 600 high-paying union jobs at the plant and 1,100 local jobs it supports.

If the DOE awards funding from its $6 billion Civil Nuclear Credit (CNC) program, it could "potentially reactivate" the plant to help bridge energy needs until a new generation of small modular reactors, or SMRs, are ready, Holtec said in a statement. Holtec hopes to have its SMR technology in use by 2030, though where they might be deployed remains to be seen.

ClearView Energy Partners, however, said Palisades' closure is "likely to be permanent."

The plant is out of nuclear fuel, faces a control rod drive seal issue that needs to be fixed, and may need a new company to operate it, and a buyer for the power it generates, ClearView said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Holtec called the application an initial step and acknowledged "there are a number of hurdles to restarting the facility that would need to be bridged."

The company said it will work with the state, federal government, and a potential third-party operator to see if restarting is a "viable option."

The DOE said it could not comment on applications to the CNC program funded by last year's bipartisan infrastructure bill.

The department is also reviewing an application from PG&E (NYSE:PCG) Corp for Diablo Canyon, a nuclear plant in California set to fully shut in 2025. DOE will announce "any conditional awards" as soon as 30 days after the Sept. 6 deadline, a spokesperson said.

Latest comments

In addition to its 1972-2022 control rod drive mechanism seal failures, and reactor pressure vessel embrittlement risks, Palisades also has a severely degraded lid. It has needed replacement for decades. After the Davis-Besse, OH Hole-in-the-Head near-miss in 2002, how can Palisades be allowed to continue operating without replacing it?! Additionally, Palisades' steam generators need replacement for the second time in the reactor's history. After San Onofre, CA's near-miss in 2012, how can Palisades continue operating without replacing the steam generators?! Yet the captured Nuclear Regulatory Commission has permitted such increasingly high-risk operations for the past 15+ years, with its ready rubber-stamp at every turn. To our peril in the Great Lakes, 95% of the U.S.'s surface fresh water, drinking water for 40 million people downstream!
Thank you for pointing out the showstopper that is Palisades' control rod drive mechanism seal leak problem. This problem has plagued Palisades since 1972, right up to 2022, and they have never implemented a root cause solution. They have only applied Band Aid temporary fixes. David Lochbaum at Union of Concerned Scientists compiled a summary of the chronic problem in 2010, entitled "Palisades Headaches: Broken Seals and Failed Heals." It is a safety significant problem unique in all of the nuclear power industry. It is not the only pathway to reactor core meltdown/catastrophic radioactivity release into the Great Lakes environment. In April 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission confirmed that Palisades is tied with Point Beach Unit 2 (on Wisconsin's Lake Michigan shore) for worst neutron-embrittled reactor pressure vessel in the U.S. Pressurized thermal shock could fracture the vessel. And replacement of Palisades' degraded reactor lid, and steam generators, are decades overdue.
Palisades is the most embrittled reactor in the U.S.at high risk of shattering the reactor vessel when there is a sudden temperature change called Pressurized Thermal Shock.  This can lead to Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) and subsequent Meltdown.  Palisades should remain shutdown.  The NRC has allowed operation in this compromised condition for decades.  The regulator has been captured by the nuclear industry and it is all about the $ at great peril to the state of Michigan.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.