Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Huawei challenges U.S. defense bill as sanctions fight ramps up

Published 05/29/2019, 10:32 AM
Updated 05/29/2019, 10:32 AM
© Reuters. Huawei's Western Europe President Vincent Pang attends a news conference n Shenzhen

By Sijia Jiang

HONG KONG (Reuters) - China's Huawei Technologies Co Ltd has filed a legal motion seeking to declare a U.S. defense law unconstitutional, in the telecom equipment maker's latest bid to fight sanctions from Washington that threaten to push it out of global markets.

The motion for summary judgment in its lawsuit against the U.S. government, filed late on Tuesday in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, asks a judge to declare the 2019 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) unconstitutional. Huawei filed its lawsuit in March.

The NDAA bill, passed by the U.S. Congress last summer, places a broad ban on federal agencies and their contractors from using Huawei equipment on national security grounds, citing the company's ties with the Chinese government.

Huawei, the world's largest telecoms network gear maker, has repeatedly denied it is controlled by the Chinese government, military or intelligence services.

U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo kept up the pressure on Huawei on Wednesday.

"Huawei is an instrument of the Chinese government," Pompeo said in an interview with Fox Business Network. "They're deeply connected. It's something that's hard for Americans to understand."

Glen Nager, a partner at law firm Jones Day and lead counsel for Huawei, told Reuters the U.S. court had agreed on a schedule to hold hearings in September on motions by opposing sides.

Some legal experts said Huawei's lawsuit was likely to be dismissed because U.S. courts are reluctant to second-guess national security determinations by other branches of government.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The lawsuit "will be an uphill battle because Congress has broad authority to protect us from perceived national security threats," said Franklin Turner, a government contracts lawyer at McCarter & English.

In November 2018, a federal appeals court rejected a similar lawsuit filed by Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab, which was challenging a ban on the use of the company's software in U.S. government networks.

'DANGEROUS PRECEDENT'

Earlier this month, the U.S. Commerce Department put Huawei on a trade blacklist that bans companies from doing business with the Chinese firm, a move which immediately disrupted the global tech sector.

Huawei's chief legal officer, Song Liuping, on Wednesday said the company was reviewing ways to fight the U.S. ban, which he said was affecting its more than 1,200 suppliers and threatened to affect its 3 billion customers in 170 countries.

Song said Washington's use of administrative orders and laws to punish a single company "sets a very dangerous precedent."

"Today it is telecom and Huawei, tomorrow it could be your company, your industry, your customers," he told reporters at Huawei's headquarters in Shenzhen.

The ban, along with separate accusations of bank fraud and corporate theft that the United States has made against Huawei and its chief financial officer, has exacerbated the trade war between Beijing and Washington.

Huawei, which has been given a 90-day reprieve from the ban, has denied its products pose a security threat and protested Washington's attempts to limit its business.

Vincent Pang, Huawei's senior vice president and head of corporate communications, said the executive order and blacklist had transcended the boundaries of normal market competition.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"This could lead to the start of the fragmentation of the global tech ecosystem and standards," Pang said on Wednesday at Huawei's headquarters.

Pang also said he did not expect the "political" situation to delay the introduction in China of fifth-generation (5G) network technology.

Latest comments

Ren said Huawei is ready for it.
Samsuang the winner
I guess it is now time to test whether there is any difference between US law system and Chinese law system. This is also going to show whether there is difference between communist country and democratic country. It is gonna be a good guidance for the rest of the world to establish their law system.
China lacks a legal system. the communist inquisition is judged on the basis of class integrity, as directed by the party organization.
The Gynese shills in these comments are hilarious
Huawei will win this hands down. There is very little chance the dedwnse bill can stand once rhe facts are in. Go Huawei!!!
International relations are entirely within the competence of the president. Chinese companies cannot expect the American constitution defence
All courts of the world play by the rules. We expect the courts here to follow the rules and laws, if not, then the world will laugh at our system.
Thanks for pointing out that there’s no rule of law in China
It is always good to challenge some kind of US authority. To uncover the meaning of American first in practice
What does China 2025 mean? Hypocrite.
this is the most ridiculous things ever. can we ask china court ban facebook, block google is unconstitutional as well?
I thought they are already banned in china.
This just shows there’s no rule of law in China
it is time to see the how independent the US court really is.
 communist inquisition judges on the basis of class expediency
more or less at the same level of usa
 Communists as juvenile delinquents. everyone steals.
constitution in China?  as we see there is no courts
 I lived under the communist yoke for 20 years, I don’t tell me about courts
Who steal from you...why dont sue them, There is world court for Arbitration & WTO Bodies for justice.......
 if you were closely following the events, you knew that the Chinese deal provided for a change in legislation aimed at protecting copyright
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.