Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Halliburton aims to boost weak businesses after failed Baker Hughes deal

Published 05/03/2016, 05:13 PM
© Reuters. The company logo of Halliburton oilfield services corporate offices is seen in Houston

By Amrutha Gayathri

(Reuters) - Halliburton Co (N:HAL) said it would consider acquisitions to bolster its weaker businesses as the world's No. 2 oilfield services company looked to move on after abandoning a deal to buy smaller rival Baker Hughes Inc (N:BHI).

The deal would have helped Halliburton better compete with market-leader Schlumberger (N:SLB) for the dwindling number of contracts from oil producers as crude prices stay stubbornly low.

While Halliburton is the market-leader in fracturing, cementing, and completion services, acquiring Baker Hughes would have boosted its artificial lift and production chemicals businesses, where the company is not dominant.

"We are going to invest in those product lines where we're a little bit weak, and we'll look at selective acquisitions to round them out," Halliburton Chief Executive Dave Lesar said on a post call with analysts. He did not elaborate.

During the 18-month period when Halliburton and Baker Hughes were trying to win regulators over to their merger, Schlumberger bought equipment maker Cameron International Corp (NYSE:CAM) to strengthen its drilling and production systems.

Seaport Global Securities analyst Kenneth Sill said it remained to be seen if the deal changed the competitive landscape.

"Halliburton has the best exposure in North American onshore completions, strongest pressure pumping in the world. So they are in great shape," Sill said.

Halliburton called off the Baker Hughes deal on Sunday after stiff opposition from U.S. and European antitrust regulators.

Lesar stressed on Tuesday that he believed the deal would have been pro-competitive, but said the continued drop in oil prices had eroded some of the expected cost advantages and made it difficult to get "adequate value" for proposed divestitures.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Still the abandoned deal has a silver lining for both companies in that they can now reduce costs that they were maintaining as a requirement for the deal.

Halliburton said it would reduce "structural costs" by about 25 percent, or $1 billion, on an annual run-rate basis by the end of 2016. Baker Hughes plans to cut annual costs by about $500 million.

The companies have been cutting costs to protect margins.

Net loss attributable to Halliburton widened to $2.41 billion in the first quarter from $643 million a year earlier, due to $2.77 billion in asset impairment and other charges.

Excluding charges, Halliburton's earnings of 7 cents per share beat analysts' estimates of 4 cents.

Halliburton's shares closed 3.8 percent lower, Baker Hughes was down 3.9 percent and Schlumberger fell 2.7 percent.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.