Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

House Democrats press U.S. gunmakers on marketing of assault rifles

Published 07/27/2022, 06:14 AM
Updated 07/27/2022, 07:06 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Vehicles are parked outside the U.S. Capitol building the morning the Senate returned to session in Washington, DC, U.S., July 31, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz

By Moira Warburton and Rose Horowitch

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Democrats on a U.S. House committee pressed the top executives of two U.S. gunmakers on Wednesday about their marketing of assault-style rifles that have been used in recent mass shootings, while the executives defended their business.

The chief executives of Sturm, Ruger & Co Inc and Daniel Defense Llc, testified at a hearing of the House of Representatives' Oversight Committee after recent mass shootings in Uvalde, Texas, and Buffalo, New York.

The shootings just 10 days apart in May at a Uvalde elementary school and a Buffalo supermarket - as well as a Fourth of July rampage at a parade in Highland Park, Illinois - claimed 38 lives in all, stirring a decades-long debate over gun rights.

"The gun industry has flooded our neighborhoods, our schools, even our churches and synagogues, and gotten rich doing it," Committee Chairwoman Carolyn Maloney, a Democrat, said in her opening statement.

A report released by the committee showed that five major gun manufacturers have generated over $1 billion in revenue from the sale of assault-style rifles in the past decade.

Democrats have long sought to impose controls on guns in hopes of reducing the toll from shootings, efforts that are opposed by Republicans and others who cite the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects the right to keep and bear arms.

Congress last month passed its first new gun safety legislation in decades, a day after the Supreme Court broadly expanded gun rights by ruling Americans have a constitutional right to carry handguns in public.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Marty Daniel, CEO of Daniel Defense, and Christopher Killoy, president and CEO of Sturm, Ruger & Co, defended the firearms industry. An assault-style rifle made by Daniel Defense was one of the weapons used in the Uvalde shooting.

Killoy told committee members, "A firearm, any firearm, can be used for good or evil. The difference is in the intent of the individual possessing it."

Democratic committee members pressed Daniel and Killoy on their companies' marketing strategies, which often feature imagery suggesting the weapons sold to civilians are comparable to those used by the U.S. military.

"We shouldn't be surprised when young men purchase these weapons to be more like soldiers, and we shouldn't be surprised when they try to act like them too," Representative Rashida Tlaib said.

Republicans argued the hearings should focus on whether Democrats were responsible for increased levels of violent crime in the United States.

Families of the victims of gun violence were also present at the hearing.

Jazmin Cazares, 17, the older sister of Jackie Cazares, who was killed in the Uvalde shooting, gave an obituary of her sister to Republican Representative Andrew Clyde, who opposes gun control legislation.

"I said (to him) I pray his kids and grandkids never have to look down the barrel of a gun like my little sister did," she said in an interview.

Mark Smith, president and CEO of Smith & Wesson Brands Inc, had been invited and had initially committed to attend but then changed his mind, committee Chairwoman Maloney said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Maloney said she intends to subpoena Smith and other executives at the company.

Smith & Wesson did not respond to attempts to obtain comment.

Latest comments

When has a gun ever killed someone? It's the "idiot" behind the trigger. Banning guns just promotes black market sales. Let's think about prohibition days... I love speak easys.
Look at all the v1olence Democrats are allowing to take place in America. This is why you absolutely need a firearm to protect yourself and your family.
Gun executive are right, criminals who no days could be your next door neighbor or one of your own kids use guns for mass shootings. However if the assult weapons and large magazine weapons they use were kept out of the hands of ordinary citizens your ordinary citizen next door neighbor or your child would have access so they could turn into criminals in mass shootings.
The gun executives would be correct in this matter. Banning any class of gun is a complete waste of time. The problem is the people around the freaks committing these crimes simply are too lazy or they simply don't care to bother with the freaks issues.
the NRA was looting donations for personal use, yet they have no shame when kids perish in school. god forgive them!
you definitely ******more people with a gun than a knife or stick, no? then you arm the whole population including the nuts.
Liberals will start blaming pencils for misspelled words.
.. I agree that the founding fathers did not imagine a rifle firing 45 rounds. However, I do believe they were smart enough to put in place a system that would account for the growth. They certainly knew that time or ingenuity would not stand still. Just because technology advances doesn't mean that the Constitution doesn't apply. Our forefathers didn't imagine computers or social media but that doesn't mean that the first amendment doesn't extend to those using those media.
Also Barani..As for a "6 round revolver". .. well how did you come up with that resolution? opinion? What happens if your idea is implemented and applied to real life? Guns with more capacity are already in the hands of criminals so your not getting them off the street. Let's say you and your family are mugged one night (God forbid), and you are carrying a 6 round pistol but your attacker is carrying a 12 round firearm. What are you going to say to your kids, your wife, your parents.... "well, I thought 6 was enough.. good bye". Making it harder for law-abiding citizens to protect their families and property is not the answer. Most gun laws enacted after a tragedy do nothing to stop tragedies from happening again. The reason is primarily because efforts are focused on the wrong issues.. again it's not the gun. It's the cultural/ social / and mental health problems in this country. Unfortunately, it's easier for our "leaders" to focus on objects than the real issues
.. finally. " the simple matter of the fact is that they have nothing to worry about if we have the same strick gun laws here..."... you are under the misperception that criminals follow laws. No matter how many laws are on the books, Criminals will not obey and will proceed to ***** It's not the gun makers that are breaking the law. Those other countries do not have the same issue because they handle mental health differently and they are culturally different.
so, they are going to subpoena automobile and liquor executives for drunk driving???? these is more grandstanding....
gunmakers are dripping blood from their hands!
 Yes, let the babies live and grow, so that we can take them out later with an AR-15 at school.
carlos guo Someone who writes articles for this site also has first amendment rights to respond to the id(iocy) in the comments field of this site. It's interesting how desperate you are to co-opt me into your side of the argument when my point was exactly the opposite: guns are made primarily for lethal purposes and the profusion of them in society happens to create almost infinite opportunity for them to be used wrongly -- as opposed to a baseball bat. Quite ingenious of you to try and interpret it differently.
.. that's just a sad response. well below an individual or your education... seriously.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.