Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Exxon faces proxy fight launched by new activist firm Engine No. 1

Published 12/07/2020, 11:52 AM
Updated 12/07/2020, 05:35 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Darren Woods, Chairman & CEO, Exxon Mobil Corporation attends a news conference at the NYSE

By Svea Herbst-Bayliss and Gary McWilliams

(Reuters) -A new investment firm is taking aim at one of corporate America's most iconic brands, pressing energy giant Exxon Mobil Corp (NYSE:XOM) to overhaul itself by focusing more on clean energy to improve its financial performance.

Engine No. 1 is being supported by pension fund California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) as it pushes the battered energy company, valued at $176 billion, to spend its cash better, preserve its dividend, and refresh its board.

"The industry and the world it operates in are changing and ... Exxon Mobil must change as well," Engine No. 1 wrote to Exxon's board, adding "given the company's long-running underperformance and the challenges it faces, it is time for shareholders to weigh in."

Exxon is reviewing the hedge fund's letter, an Exxon spokesman said.

The U.S. oil company this year reversed course on a massive oil and gas expansion program, cutting 30% from its spending plan and proposing a budget next year that is $4 billion to $7 billion below its outlays this year. It also plans to reduce its workforce by 14,000 people over the next two years as losses this year reached $2.37 billion.

Engine No. 1 faces a tough road. Exxon has beaten back past activist efforts to change its climate stance and to split the roles of chairman and chief executive.

But industry analysts also said the time may be right for traditional activists' interest to overlap with climate activists' interest and force Exxon to act. "There is a need for a fairly active reset right now," said Andrew Logan, senior director of oil and gas at Ceres, a non profit organization that works with institutional investors and companies. "Everyone starts at the bottom of the hill with Exxon but Engine No. 1's director nominees is not a list of flaky people."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The activist investment firm, launched last week by two hedge fund industry veterans, said it plans to nominate four directors to Exxon's 10-person board who have expertise in clean technology and running energy companies: Gregory Goff, Kaisa Hietala, Alexander Karsner, and Anders Runevad.

"Exxon's refusal to adequately address climate risk is of serious concern to many shareholders and is a sign of significant governance issues. The company's board needs overhauling. We're looking forward to reviewing the slate of new directors," said New York State Comptroller Thomas P. DiNapoli, whose fund owns a roughly $300 million stake, according to Refinitiv data.

Besides pushing Exxon to add new directors with more relevant energy industry experience to the board, the investment firm also wants Exxon to cut costs on projects that are unlikely to earn money, create a better plan for success in the renewable energy sector and to overhaul management compensation to better align with shareholder value creation, the letter said.

Exxon has long faced investor pressure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions but this is the first time an activist firm is mounting a proxy contest that could resonate with both institutional investors concerned about the company's direction and retail investors worried about dividends, analysts said.

This was the first year since 1982 that Exxon has not raised its dividend and its share price has tumbled 41% in 52 weeks. Its $15 billion a year dividend should be cut because it drains cash that could restructure the business, some analysts said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Engine No. 1 is run by Chris James, best known for technology investing but who also has considerable energy investment experience, and Charles Penner, who led activist investment firm Jana Partner's campaign against iPhone maker Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) to let parents limit children's phone in 2018.

Engine No. 1 owns roughly $40 million worth of stock in Exxon, according to a person familiar with the investment, while CalSTRS owns roughly $334 million, according to Refinitiv data.The campaign's success will depend largely on how Vanguard Group, BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) and State Street (NYSE:STT), the country's biggest index funds that are also Exxon's top three shareholders, react.

BlackRock and State Street are members of Climate Action 100+, an investor group pressing the largest greenhouse gas emitters to act on climate change. BlackRock this year pressured Exxon by voting against two directors and voting to split the chairman and CEO roles on the board, but the push failed.

Exxon shares fell 1.9% to $40.88 in afternoon trading.

Latest comments

It would be better for Earth if National Govts. would take a serious interest in preserving natural resources like crude oil, coal, and lng, for posterity. (OR there may not be a posterity). Fossil Fueled (fake) economies should have been phased OUT 100 years ago. It MIGHT not be too late yet. Tic-Toc.
Exxon needs to do what best for it's largest class of shareholders which isn't institutions. Im investing in an oil transportation petrochemical company there are other stocks to buy if you want green....stay in your lane.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.