Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Explainer-Could Biden use the 14th Amendment to raise the debt ceiling?

Published 05/21/2023, 11:02 AM
Updated 05/22/2023, 05:31 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on "preventing a first-ever government default" during a brief event prior to his departure for Japan, in the Roosevelt Room at the White House in Washington, U.S., May 17, 2023. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

By Andy Sullivan and Jacqueline Thomsen

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Joe Biden on Sunday said he believes he has the legal right to invoke the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution to raise the federal government's $31.4 trillion debt ceiling but does not have the time to do so.

Some fellow Democrats have been urging him to try to use that untested legal theory to bypass the Republican-controlled House of Representatives and raise the borrowing limit.

WHAT IS THE 14TH AMENDMENT?

Section Four of 14th Amendment, adopted after the 1861-1865 Civil War, states that the "validity of the public debt of the United States ... shall not be questioned."

Historians say that aimed to ensure the federal government would not repudiate its debts, as some former Confederate states had done.

But the clause has been largely unaddressed by the courts, and legal experts disagree about what it requires from Congress and the presidency.

Some, like Cornell University law professor Michael Dorf, say the "least unconstitutional" option would be for Biden to act on his own to protect the integrity of the national debt.

"That would mean borrowing money," he said.

Any action by Biden would surely prompt a lawsuit.

WHO COULD SUE OVER THE DEBT CEILING?

It's not clear who could bring a case. It could be difficult for any plaintiff to prove they had been harmed by the action — a legal concept known as "standing."

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 1997 that individual lawmakers do not have standing to file such lawsuits, but Congress could potentially vote to say that it had been collectively harmed.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The high court could also opt to hear a challenge in the interest of quickly resolving the issue, as they have done with Biden's move to cancel $430 billion in student debt.

Any case would be in uncharted legal territory.

The Supreme Court has ruled on the public-debt clause only once, in a 1935 challenge to Democratic President Franklin Roosevelt's decision to take the United States off the gold standard. The court ruled that the plaintiff, a bondholder, did not have standing to file the case.

Biden and Congress, meanwhile, would be under tremendous pressure to resolve the issue quickly - meaning any case might be irrelevant before it reaches the court.

WHERE DOES THE WHITE HOUSE STAND ON THE 14TH AMENDMENT?

The last time this was a front-burner issue in Washington in 2011 and 2013, prominent Democrats like former President Bill Clinton urged then-President Barack Obama to invoke the 14th Amendment. But White House aides said they did not believe they had the legal authority to do so.

Biden on Sunday said he believed he did, but there was not enough time for that strategy to pay off before June 1, when the Treasury Department has warned that the government may not be able to pay all its bills.

Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen sounded a similar note on Sunday.

HOW WOULD MARKETS REACT IF BIDEN USES THE 14TH AMENDMENT?

Administration officials and economists have said that a default triggered by a debt-ceiling breach would roil the world financial system and plunge the United States into recession.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

That immediate catastrophe might be avoided if Biden invoked the 14th Amendment.

But investors nevertheless could be spooked by the drama and demand higher interest rates to reflect the increased risk while the legal issues played out.

Latest comments

The America haters are so ignorant. Biden has an ace in the hole (and no, its not the 14th amendment or some gimmick). Rant away my hating friends, don't be surprised when you find yourself saying, "I never saw that coming."
On what basis does Biden think he can use 14th Admendmant? Last time I checked, he finished 78th out of 85 in law school and was found guilty of plagiarism. Not exactly the sharpest tool in the tool box.
Risky endeavor that will end up at the U.S. Supreme Court. Do you really want to risk the US debt default to a Supreme Court that is 6 to 3 Republicans. If past experience is any guide, this will be one hairy ride between not and June 1st and , even if settled before the deadline, risks another credit rating downgrade. Think 2011, agreement was reached August 1st, US credit downgrade was issued over the weekend of August 6 and 7th, all markets plunged 5 to 7% on August 8th, with the yearly 2011 low set on Oct 3rd, 2011, trading virtually sideways for 3 months.
Legality of using 14th amendment will need to define first what is public debt, was the 14th intended to cover public programs outside of interest payments, who is in breach of the 14th..is it the treasury 1st for not prioritizing the limited money, or senate for not voting on existing bill to keep things moving, or government for not revising expenditures down to free some money to pay existing interest before going further into debt. Basically it would become a mess and years of litigation to resolve tons of arguments especially since constitution is involved.
actually, I believe, he just does it and lets the courts sort it out - buys him a lot of time and is a big f you to the GOP's manipulating the narrative about how they're all so concerned about the debt - they weren't when they gave the rich that big juicy tax cut and increased it like sheep for trumpy - personally i'm all for it!
Thats not how thats going to work. If he used 14th it would put in motion a trial that could last several weeks if not months. By the time things get worked out we will be in a depression, flying right by the whole recession phase. The 14th isn’t a free pass. Its a cascade of one part of the financial system breaking after another.
Could the 14th amendment be used to increase inflation and drain liquidity from the banking system?
So the same people who constantly told me Trump is a threat to democracy because he doesn’t care about the constitution are willing to sidestep the constitution for political ends. Got it. Kinda reminds me of how Obama killed a US citizen without a trial, but no one cares.
you do get, the 14th amendment is a part of the constitution, Trump tried to overthrow the legally elected party - thats called a coup - major difference - but that's something the Putinski bots and ignorant of the GOP might not get - ask chat GPT to tell you if using the 14th amendment would be legal - you obviously need someone to help your thinking capacity
There is no thinking there. Just thrashing about.
answer is No
Another misleading article. The 14th amendment requires the government to pay its debts. It does not allow to breach the debt ceiling. These two things, paying the debt and holding the ceiling,  are not mutually exclusive.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.