Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Last Call for Cyber Monday! Save Now on Claim 60% OFF

Exclusive: JPMorgan employees gripe about Dimon's return-to-office edict

Published Apr 27, 2023 02:41PM ET Updated Apr 27, 2023 09:31PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Jamie Dimon, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan Chase & Co., gestures as he speaks during an interview with Reuters in Miami, Florida, U.S., February 8, 2023. REUTERS/Marco Bello 2/2
 
GS
+2.06%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
JPM
+0.54%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
MS
+1.97%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
BK
+0.81%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
UBSG
+0.77%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
C
+2.45%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Nupur Anand and Lananh Nguyen

NEW YORK (Reuters) - JPMorgan Chase & Co (NYSE:JPM) CEO Jamie Dimon sent a clear message to employees this month: get back to the office. It touched a nerve among his staff.

The largest U.S. lender's employees inundated an internal messaging forum with criticism after its operating committee posted an edict entitled, "The importance of being together." Some staffers pushed back, calling the message "tone deaf" and "divisive."

Although only a tiny fraction of the bank's 297,000 employees posted comments, the volume of pushback, which has not been previously reported, was high for what's typical on the company intranet, said three employees spanning different levels of seniority.

Employees, including managers, complained about a "Zoom culture" in which staffers were stuck on virtual conference calls even when present in the office. They also groused about the challenges posed by long commutes and family caretaking responsibilities.

Comments were locked after about a day, which is typical for posts with a high volume of responses, another source said.

JPMorgan declined to comment.

'CORRECTIVE ACTION'

In the nearly 700-word note on April 12 that sent ripples across the financial industry, the bank asked managing directors to return to the office five days a week and warned other employees working on hybrid schedules that they needed to show up three days a week or face consequences. Managers may consider attendance in performance reviews and take "corrective action" if requirements are not met, the memo said.

JPMorgan first called employees back to the office on a rotational basis in mid-2021 after months of pandemic shutdowns.

Employee grievances highlight the debate raging in corporate America over what is the right balance between in-office collaboration and flexibility.

Even among the large Wall Street banks, views have differed. Dimon and his counterparts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc (NYSE:GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) have been prominent advocates of in-office working for learning, innovation and culture. By contrast, Citigroup Inc (NYSE:C), UBS Group AG (SIX:UBSG) and Bank of New York Mellon (NYSE:BK) Corp have embraced more flexibility as a way to attract and retain talent.

Davia Temin, chief executive of crisis management firm Temin and Co, said employers may roll back pandemic flexibility and demand more in-office working as a recession looms and workers vie to keep their jobs.

"Working from home was introduced during extraordinary times and leaders have the right to change that, especially now as we are likely to be getting into a recession where profitability will be key," Temin said.

"It is not a God-given right, so it can be changed."

GROWING CONCERN

Dimon, who took the helm in 2006, said after sending out the memo that he felt the need for leaders to be available for spontaneous in-office discussions.

"Some people weren't following the rules," Dimon said, in response to a Reuters question on an earnings media call on April 14. "We don't want to punish everybody because of that, but people agreed to do three days a week; we expect three days a week."

He added: "We completely understand that some people don't want to do it -- they can not do it elsewhere."

A JPMorgan spokesman at the time emphasized the bank would maintain flexibility.

In the comments on the memo, which were reviewed by Reuters, some employees gave reasons ranging from traffic and costs to work-life balance as factors to consider against a strict policy.

"Most people on my team (and even other teams around me) live pretty far from the office," one employee wrote in a post. "Being stuck in traffic more often and paying even more for gas (prices are rising) is not good for myself and many others."

Another commenter wrote: "In spite of the claims here, this is not actually about collaboration." The post was liked by at least 90 readers.

Others said remote working was beneficial for mental health, family life and workplace diversity. Many branch employees, building staff and other workers have reported to offices throughout the pandemic without the option to work remotely.

In an interview, one JPMorgan employee said the three-day hybrid rule was being enforced so strictly that some workers were asked not to schedule personal commitments, like doctor's appointments, on those days.

"There is a growing concern that if managers are going to be coming in five days a week, they may informally start asking the juniors to be in there as well," the employee said, declining to be identified for fear of retribution.

Exclusive: JPMorgan employees gripe about Dimon's return-to-office edict
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
Rich Ash
Rich Ash Apr 28, 2023 1:14AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Oh no, poor babies have to go to work. 😭
Takis Karalivanos
Takis Karalivanos Apr 27, 2023 4:25PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Tip: if your job can be done remotely, it can be outsourced.
taylor jason
taylor jason Apr 27, 2023 4:25PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
100% I work for a large bank (won't say which) and am in India right now building teams in two cities. all you see in the embassy zones (what they call the location where banks set up shop in India) are massive plots of land in which large banks are building state of the art new buildings to employee armies of individuals within these regions. on average the bank will get 6x employees overseas for the price of 1x us employee
Benjamin USA
Benjamin USA Apr 27, 2023 2:53PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
An oddly authoritarian policy. Can they measure the value it adds or just someone’s arbitrary opinion?
taylor jason
taylor jason Apr 27, 2023 2:53PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
it already is measured. companies collect idle time data then compare that to time card data and find big discrepancies
taylor jason
taylor jason Apr 27, 2023 2:53PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
last I checked if people don't like the policy thyley can quit
Mad Money
Mad Money Apr 27, 2023 2:53PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
taylor jason speak for yourself. I work for a large bank and wfh putting in 50+ hours a week, sometimes 60+
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email