Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Democrats in U.S. Congress blast Postal Service revamp plan

Published 03/24/2021, 06:34 PM
Updated 03/24/2021, 06:45 PM
© Reuters. A United States Postal Service (USPS) mailbox is pictured in Pasadena

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Democratic lawmakers on Wednesday blasted the 10-year strategic plan proposed a day earlier by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) that would eliminate $160 billion in forecasted red ink by slowing some mail deliveries, cutting some retail hours and closing some locations.

USPS officials remained optimistic Congress will pass financial reforms that could provide the money-losing agency with nearly $60 billion in relief.

Senator Alex Padilla, a Democrat, said the USPS plan would "result in longer delivery times, reduced post office hours and higher prices."

Representative Carolyn Maloney, who chairs the committee overseeing USPS, said Postmaster General Louis DeJoy's plan "to make permanent slower mail delivery" was unacceptable "should not be implemented until Congress and the American people have the opportunity to fully review it."

Maloney has circulated draft legislation that would eliminate a requirement that USPS pre-fund retiree health benefits. It also would require postal employees to enroll in government-retiree health plan Medicare.

U.S. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi criticized various aspects of DeJoy's plan but said Congress will ensure "the Postal Service has the resources needed to serve the American people."

DeJoy said action is urgently needed: "We have to start every conversation," he said. "We're losing $10 billion a year -- gotta fix it."

Ron Bloom, who chairs the U.S. Postal Board of Governors, said in an interview he was optimistic that Congress "will embrace" the plan once carefully reviewed.

Bloom said "we're not asking for you to bail us out, we're not asking you to fix all of our problems, but if you do your part you will help enable a true revitalization of this institution."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

USPS wants President Joe Biden's Administration to calculate pension obligations using "modern actuarial principles" that would save $12 billion.

Representative James Comer, the top Republican on the committee overseeing USPS, said he hoped Democrats "will abandon their partisan postal politics and give the plan a fair shot... Between USPS leadership and Congress, we must make the necessary reforms to ensure USPS is financially stable."

The National Association of Letter Carriers said the "business plan provides a good starting point for discussion going forward and should satisfy those who wanted to see such a plan before moving forward with legislation."

USPS reported net losses of $86.7 billion since 2007. One reason is 2006 legislation mandating it pre-fund more than $120 billion in retiree health care and pension liabilities, a requirement labor unions have called an unfair burden not shared by other businesses.

 

Latest comments

55 retire with full benefits is oneof the black hole for usps. The Dems dont want to touch that. Cut back routes? Cant do either. I guess gov workers can s/u/x on tax payers forever.
Not sure what you mean by 55 retire with full benefits. Over the years the retirement age has gone up, and somewhere in the early 80s the retirement plan changed from CSRS TO FERS. Very few employees in the USPS are under the CSRS retirement program. Under FERS employees get 1 percent per year served in the USPS. So if you work for 30 years your pension is 30 percent of your base pay for the average of your final 3 years served. Under the Civil service retirement system, (CSRS) they had a higher pension, but did not pay into social security. Under the Federal Employee Retirement System (FERS), they pay into social security, and then the pension is much less.
Fire Dejoy
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.