Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

U.S. Congress seeks way forward for stalled China bill with chips funding

Published 11/14/2021, 08:05 PM
Updated 11/15/2021, 12:21 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Semiconductor chips are pictured at chip packaging firm Unisem (M) Berhad plant in Ipoh, Malaysia October 15, 2021. REUTERS/Lim Huey Teng/File Photo

By Patricia Zengerle

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Sweeping legislation to boost U.S. competitiveness with China and fund much-needed semiconductor production passed the Senate with bipartisan support in June but has stalled in the House of Representatives as backers struggle to find a way to pass it.

Although President Joe Biden's Democrats control both chambers of Congress, House members said they wanted to write their own bill, not consider the Senate-passed U.S. Innovation and Competition Act, or USICA.

Five months later, the House has not voted on its own bill nor taken up USICA. And with a packed legislative agenda https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-november-agenda-not-faint-heart-2021-11-01, there is scant time to do so in 2021.

The Senate passed USICA https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senate-set-pass-sweeping-bill-address-china-tech-threat-2021-06-08 by 68-32. The measure was a rare legislative foray into industrial policy, authorizing $190 billion to strengthen U.S. technology and research, and an additional $54 billion to increase U.S. production and research into semiconductors and telecommunications equipment.

China says USICA distorts facts and is based on "cold war thinking." Chinese foreign ministry spokesman Zhao Lijian told a daily briefing in Beijing on Monday that it would harm relations. "China has always resolutely opposed this," he said.

Sources told Reuters https://www.reuters.com/business/exclusive-chinese-embassy-lobbies-us-business-oppose-china-bills-sources-2021-11-12 that China has been pushing U.S. executives, companies and business groups to fight against USICA and other China-related bills in Congress.

A worldwide shortage of computer chips is crimping production of everything from gaming consoles to vehicles. Money in USICA would help expand manufacturing.

Many issues addressed in USICA, including trade and human rights, are expected to feature at Monday's virtual summit https://www.reuters.com/world/china/biden-chinas-xi-expected-meet-virtually-monday-sources-2021-11-11 between Biden and Chinese leader Xi Jinping.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A House Democratic leadership aide would not give a timeline for House consideration of the measure, saying only there are still areas where the House and Senate must resolve differences.

ADDING PROVISIONS TO DEFENSE BILL

Many senators are shifting their focus toward including USICA provisions in other legislation https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senators-propose-adding-boycott-chinas-winter-olympics-defense-bill-2021-10-28 expected to pass within weeks, such as the National Defense Authorization Act, or NDAA, a must-pass annual defense policy bill.

On Sunday, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said in a letter https://www.democrats.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/CES%20Dear%20Colleague%2011.14.21.pdf that the Senate would likely take up NDAA this week and "may add the Senate-passed text of USICA to the NDAA."

He added that "would enable a USICA negotiation with the House to be completed alongside NDAA before the end of the year."

The House Foreign Affairs Committee advanced a China bill in July, but all 20 committee Republicans opposed the "Ensuring American Global Leadership and Engagement Act," or Eagle Act. There has been no word on timing of a vote in the full House.

The Eagle Act is narrower than USICA, focusing on foreign policy. It also includes provisions, such as on climate, that Republicans said they will not support.

But generally, the desire for a hard line on China is one of the few truly bipartisan sentiments in Congress. Lawmakers and aides from both parties worry the bill could slip well into 2022 if something does not change quickly.

Senator Tim Kaine, a Democrat on both the foreign relations and armed services committees, expressed frustration. "I was happy to see this legislation pass the Senate in June on a broadly bipartisan basis and strongly urge the House to take it up swiftly and send it to the president’s desk without delay," he said in a statement.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"It is critical Congress pass strong, bipartisan legislation to address the generational threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party," said Representative Michael McCaul, the top Republican on the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Latest comments

Gee, I’m sure more laws will fix it.
Please stop trying to help.
Chinese bought few prostituts for democrat lawmakers and bill stalled.  Easy as it is.
if you don't have proof of that, those kind of comments can be kept to yourself. This thread should be reserved for constructive thinking and trying to resolve the goings on for investing purposes. All it does is slander and waste peoples time.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.