Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

Biz groups say Biden independent contractor rule clashes with federal law

Published 12/14/2022, 12:13 PM
Updated 12/14/2022, 02:31 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden speaks about inflation at the White House in Washington, U.S., December 13, 2022. REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque/File Photo

By Daniel Wiessner

(Reuters) - Business groups have told the Biden administration that its proposal to limit U.S. companies' use of independent contractors is not in line with federal wage law, previewing legal challenges that are likely to come once the rule is finalized.

The U.S. Department of Labor received more than 50,000 comments on the October proposal ahead of a Tuesday night deadline, a staggering number that underscores the broad impact the rule will have on industries including the gig economy, trucking and manufacturing.

The proposal, which will likely be finalized in the spring, would require that workers be considered employees, entitled to more benefits and legal protections than contractors, when they are "economically dependent" on a company.

It would replace a Trump administration regulation that says workers who own their own businesses or have the ability to work for competing companies, such as a driver who works for Uber (NYSE:UBER) and Lyft (NASDAQ:LYFT), can be treated as contractors.

Many labor unions, worker advocacy groups and Democrats support the proposal and submitted comments claiming worker misclassification is rampant in many industries including trucking, delivery, construction and home healthcare and particularly harms low-income immigrant and minority workers.

Several major business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and National Federation of Independent Business said the Labor Department had not explained the abrupt change proposed less than two years after the Trump-era rule took effect.

That claim will likely be a focal point in lawsuits challenging the rule. The federal law regulating rulemaking by agencies requires them to explain why existing rules are inadequate and must be replaced.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Groups also said the way the proposal defines employment is broader than under federal wage law, and that the Labor Department underestimated the cost of the rule to employers.

"The proposed rule is arbitrary and capricious and, therefore, likely to be rejected by the first federal court to evaluate its enforceability," said the Flex (NASDAQ:FLEX) Association, which represents Uber, Lyft and other gig economy companies.

The left-leaning Center for American Progress, citing a 2021 study, said the Trump administration rule has cost workers $3.7 billion and reduced social insurance funds such as workers' compensation and unemployment insurance by $750 million.

Latest comments

The “gig economy” is nothing more than a form of modern-day feudal serfdom, wherein Feudalism has been supplanted by End-Stage Capitalism.
More illegal moves by Biden admin to usher in socialism without an act of Congress
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.