Sign up to create alerts for Instruments,
Economic Events and content by followed authors
Free Sign Up Already have an account? Sign In
Quotes
All Instrument Types
- All Instrument Types
- Indices
- Equities
- ETFs
- Funds
- Commodities
- Currencies
- Crypto
- Bonds
- Certificates
Please try another search
🚨 Our Pro Data Reveals the True Winner of Earnings Season Access Data
Banker with cancer claims $5 million from NatWest over dismissal
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A branch of NatWest Bank is seen in the City of London February 8, 2011. REUTERS/Chris Helgren/File Photo
By Kirstin Ridley
LONDON (Reuters) -A senior banker is suing NatWest for around 4.3 million pounds ($5.2 million) after a London judge ruled that she was discriminated against and unfairly dismissed days after cancer surgery.
Adeline Willis, who had worked at NatWest for more than six years, partially won her case in February after a judge concluded that making her redundant from her 160,000 pound a year job in 2020, eight months after a bowel cancer diagnosis, was "tainted with discrimination".
Cancer is listed as a disability under the UK Equality Act 2010, protecting sufferers from discrimination.
Lawyers for NatWest and the 44-year-old risk and compliance officer clashed on Monday at the Central London Employment Tribunal over document disclosures relating to her income since she left the bank.
Willis has increased her claim after NatWest's "high handed manner" in its response to the latest proceedings, a document filed with the court showed. The case is unusual because most employment claims are settled out of court.
Paul Gilroy, a lawyer for Willis, told a hearing listed for two days that NatWest wanted to call four witnesses to "attack" Willis's evidence, including challenging the impact of finding out she had been dismissed by text message when in hospital.
"We have turned up here effectively under false pretences. There's not a cat in hell's chance of dealing with this case in two days," Gilroy said.
Charles Crow, a lawyer for NatWest, conceded Willis's team could have been told earlier how many experts the bank was now calling. But both sides should have realised that a two-day hearing would not be enough to deal with disagreements, he said.
"We recognise the extremely difficult personal circumstances in this case and that there were things the bank did not get right," a NatWest spokesperson said.
"NatWest remains committed to building an inclusive culture and ensuring this cannot happen again."
The case continues.
($1 = 0.8267 pounds)
Related Articles
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
Report this comment
I feel that this comment is:
Comment flagged
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.