Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

U.S. House Republicans end earmarks ban ahead of Biden's infrastructure push

Published 03/17/2021, 09:58 AM
Updated 03/17/2021, 04:00 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The U.S. Capitol dome is pictured in Washington

By David Morgan and Jarrett Renshaw

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday voted to join Democrats in ending their self-imposed ban on earmarks and resume the controversial practice of allowing lawmakers to add pet projects to spending bills.

The move comes as Congress prepares to take up a number of spending bills, as well as an expected infrastructure package sought by Democratic President Joe Biden that could be worth as much as $2 trillion over 10 years.

The decision signals a Republican willingness to negotiate with Democrats on the details of a massive infrastructure package and the federal budget.

Earmarks are considered legislative "sweeteners" that Democrats, who control both chambers of Congress, can use to dissuade members from defecting on major bills and attract votes from Republicans who otherwise may oppose a measure.

News of the 102-84 House Republican vote to resume earmarks drew a mixed reaction from Republicans in the U.S. Senate, who now appear to be heading toward their own decision on the topic.

Republicans halted the practice when they took the House majority in 2011, amid a series of controversies and concerns that earmarks were driving up the federal deficit with wasteful spending. Lawmakers said earmarks will now return with safeguards to foster transparency and combat corruption.

"There's a real concern about the administration directing where money goes. This doesn't add one more dollar. I think members here know ... about what should go in their district, not Biden,” Republican House Leader Kevin McCarthy told reporters.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

House and Senate Republicans are divided between those who view earmarks as a way for lawmakers to influence the flow of federal money to their constituents and members of the party's conservative wing who worry about the effects on the debt and entrenched political interests.

"The Republican Party should be ashamed of itself for embracing earmarks when the American people are staring at $30 trillion in debt," congressman Chip Roy said after the vote. He was one of 18 House Republicans who told House Speaker Nancy Pelosi in a letter that they would not participate in the practice.

Republican Senator Ted Cruz called the decision "a serious mistake," telling reporters that "earmarks have played a major role in the out-of-control spending we have in Washington and they play a major role in entrenching the swamp."

Earmarks became a hot campaign issue in the early 2000s after a long string of scandals in which lawmakers from both parties secured earmarks to enrich themselves.

Soon after House Republicans banned the practice in 2011, the Democratic-led Senate followed suit at the urging of Democratic President Barack Obama. Earmarks have been gone since.

But Democratic lawmakers announced earlier this year that they were bringing back the practice, hoping it could solve a few issues, such as keeping their narrow majorities together on big votes, boosting vulnerable members’ re-election chances in 2022 and perhaps attracting Republican support.

A number of Senate Republicans on Wednesday signaled that they favored the practice with adequate protections in place.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"I have an interest in seeing the current status changed," Republican Senator Mike Rounds told reporters.

Latest comments

"Republicans in the U.S. House of Representatives on Wednesday voted to join Democrats in ending their self-imposed ban on earmarks and resume the controversial practice of allowing lawmakers to add pet projects to spending bills."  -- anyone still under the delusion that the republican party is fiscal responsible?
Takes a while to undo all the damage from the trump administration destruction of the immigration system.
Fix the border crisis. Now. You don't think about interior design when your house is on fire. And right now the whole block is in flames, about to consume half your city. Jesus...
what border crisis?  half of the city is in flame now is it?  what's next, the four horsemen are coming?  Jesus......
Was there an article when democrats voted to give up their ban on earmarks?
yes, yes there was! In fact the GOP rip them for doing so saying it only added liberal pork to spending bills. Guess they need some conservative pork in the spending bills too.
   now that GOP lost the majority they need the earmarks to continue their pork barrel projects
Yup the GOP will vote yes to anything as long as it contains some benefit for themselves or their big money donor. Give them enough and they will agree to legalizing abortions or legalizing all immigration.
LOL, you do realize that democrats already gave up their ban on earmarks, right?
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.