Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

U.S. Senate blocks Democrats' bid for White House documents in Trump impeachment trial

Published 01/21/2020, 05:05 PM
© Reuters. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY) speaks to media during a brief recess of the Senate impeachment trial of U.S. President Trump in Washington

By Susan Cornwell and David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-controlled Senate rejected a Democratic bid to force the White House to produce more documents and evidence on Tuesday, in a sign the third impeachment trial in U.S. history could proceed along lines favorable to President Donald Trump.

As the impeachment trial began in earnest, senators voted 53-47 along party lines to block a motion from Democratic leader Chuck Schumer to subpoena White House documents related to Trump's dealings with Ukraine.

On the first day of the trial, Trump's chief legal defender attacked the case as baseless and a top Democratic lawmaker said there was "overwhelming" evidence of wrongdoing.

Democrats have called on the Republican-controlled Senate to remove Trump from office for pressuring Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a political rival, and then impeding the inquiry into the matter.

Trump, who was impeached last month by the Democratic-led House of Representatives on charges of abusing power and obstructing Congress, denies any wrongdoing and describes his impeachment as a partisan hoax to derail his 2020 re-election.

With the television cameras rolling, U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts convened the proceedings and the two sides began squabbling over Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's proposed rules for the trial.

White House counsel Pat Cipollone, who is leading Trump's defense, attacked the foundation of the charges against the Republican president and said Democrats had not come close to meeting the U.S. Constitution's standard for impeachment.

"The only conclusion will be that the president has done absolutely nothing wrong," Cipollone said as he argued in favor of McConnell's proposal to decide on whether to allow further witnesses or documents later in the trial.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"There is absolutely no case," he said.

Democratic Representative Adam Schiff, who helped spearhead the House impeachment inquiry, summarized the charges against Trump and said the Republican president had committed a "trifecta of constitutional misconduct justifying impeachment."

Schiff said that although the evidence against Trump was "already overwhelming," further witness testimony was necessary to show the full scope of the misconduct by the president and those around him.

Democrats want a number of current and former Trump administration officials, including Trump's former national security adviser John Bolton, to testify.

"For all of the name-calling and fingerpointing from the president’s counsel, we did not hear a single argument on the merits about why there should not be the documents and witnesses we requested in this trial,” Schumer said.

McConnell unveiled a plan on Monday for what would be a potentially quick trial without new testimony or evidence. It would have given Democratic prosecutors and Trump's lawyers 48 hours, evenly split, to present their arguments over four days.

That plan was changed to give each side three days of opening arguments over two 24-hour periods. The rules also will allow the House's record of the impeachment probe admitted as evidence in the trial, as Democrats had demanded.

"We discussed it at lunch. It was pretty much a (Republican) conference consensus that made a lot more sense," Republican Senator Ron Johnson said.

Democrats had accused McConnell of trying to rig a trial with proposed rules that they said would prevent witnesses from testifying and bar evidence gathered by investigators.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

McConnell has repeatedly said the rules would mirror those the Senate used in the 1999 impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton, a Democrat. Republican senators have not ruled out the possibility of further witness testimony and evidence.

Latest comments

America is great again by obstruction of justice in the name of democracy.
America not Great again ?! Just ******** poor under this dope !
Looks like Trump will be gone before election.
Not with Backdoor Barrack McConnell co ering up shadows and the stuff under the rug ?!
hey wong, your wong again.
Dems fell for the trap. It's not about the Senate trial rules. There will be no trial as the hearing was unconstitutional.
There was nothing unconstitutional about the House hearings. They followed the very rules that the Republicans created back in 2015. And don't forget, the hearings in the House were not a trial. They were simply the investigation.
release the documents into evidence and call witnesses and stop the obstruction. the vast majority of people want this traitor out! Along with all the Russiablicans on the take trying to cover up all the evidence and lie for their furor
As long as the Senate is Controlled by this group and Backdoor Barracks McConnell the Head "There will NEVER be TRUE justice" ! Waste of Real TAXPAYERS dimes, emotion as they continue to want to keep up this CORRUPTION !!!
Thank you leftist MSM for that
As one side of the aisle literally has done nothing over the last four years except try to overturn the last presidential election i ask... wjst is the polarization... sane vs insane? Progress vs stagnation? Every four years we the people have the chance to impeach the president at the ballot box... unless the democratic majority house of reps decides to run a coup...
"Democrat party"... There's nothing "Democratic" about them !
James you're wrong. The Democrat-controlled House has passed plenty of good legislation. But the reason you don't know about it is because your "good ol' boy Moscow Mitch" is leaving a huge stack of House bills to die on his Senate desk. He puts party over the country time and time again.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.