Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

Bipartisan group of senators presses forward on U.S. policing reform talks

Published 04/21/2021, 01:54 PM
Updated 04/21/2021, 07:55 PM
© Reuters. Impeachment trial of former U.S. President Trump continues in Washington

By Makini Brice and Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -One day after a former police officer was convicted of murdering George Floyd, a bipartisan group of U.S. lawmakers was in talks on a policing reform bill, but the issue of qualified immunity for officers accused of excessive force remained a sticking point.

Republican Senator Tim Scott and Democratic Senator Cory Booker said on Wednesday that talks were making progress. Democratic Representative Karen Bass, whose George Floyd Justice in Policing Act passed the House of Representatives earlier this year, has also been involved.

Scott and Booker are also in informal discussions with a bipartisan group of House lawmakers known as the Problem Solvers Caucus, an aide familiar with the talks said.

"I think we are on the verge of wrapping this up in the next week or two, depending on how quickly they respond to our suggestions," Scott told reporters.

Scott introduced a policing bill last summer during global protests sparked by the death of Floyd, an African-American man whom white Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin killed by kneeling on his neck for more than nine minutes.

That bill failed in the Senate after Democrats said it relied too much on incentives rather than mandating changes.

Chauvin's conviction on Tuesday prompted new calls for action in Congress on police reform. The George Floyd bill, which aims to put a stop to aggressive law enforcement tactics, has not yet been considered by the Senate.

Republicans have criticized Bass' bill because it strips police officers of qualified immunity.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Qualified immunity protects police officers and other types of government officials from civil litigation in certain circumstances, allowing lawsuits only when an individual's "clearly established" statutory or constitutional rights have been violated.

Unions for police officers and sheriffs have both opposed the changes to qualified immunity made in the House bill.

Scott said his proposal would make it easier for victims of police violence to sue police departments, rather than police officers.

Civilians currently face numerous legal barriers in trying to hold police departments or municipalities accountable for civil rights violations.

According to Supreme Court precedent, they typically must show that official policies or certain customs were the "moving force" behind their injuries, or that the officer had been improperly trained. Courts often dismiss those claims, citing an absence of evidence.

'A PATH FORWARD'

President Joe Biden plans to address police reform legislation in his first speech to a joint session of Congress next week, the White House said on Wednesday.

Booker said reforms remained necessary, even after Tuesday's verdict.

"Any meaningful bill must include accountability for egregious misconduct, more transparency and changing police practices to prevent police violence from occurring in the first place," Booker said in a statement.

"I'm encouraged by the conversations I'm having with fellow senators on both sides of the aisle, and am hopeful we can find a path forward on meaningful policing reform," he added.

Bass declined to give details about the talks, but told reporters: "There's a lot of room for discussion around qualified immunity. ... We need the individual officers and the agencies to be accountable."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Bass said she hoped there would be a Senate bill by May 25.

Latest comments

The real question is who is going to want to be a cop anymore? They’ve had problems for decades in attracting good people because of working conditions and pay. You need to have a high level of tolerance, which the majority of people don’t have.
The union is in control. Cut the union. Everything else is a show
Not only should there not be qualified immunity, they should be held to a higher standard. They are trained professionals. We can go down the list of professionals bothbblue and white collar and none have qualified immunity. Ask doctors about their malpractice insurance
Democrats are great a math, until you show them race vs crime numbers. Then suddenly they can't understand 1+1
They talk till the cow comes home. Remember Rodney King? That was almost 30 years ago. What happened? There must be balance in the law they are going to implement. Otherwise, they tird the police hands
Keep the animals in the cities. The lawsuits that these cities have to fight (answer) will bankrupt the system to the point that taxes will increase and there is the begining of the end. I have watched how the inner cities have crumbled over the years and how state money is funneled in to bail out the loser leaders of these dirty, run down degenerate inner cities.
Now they are trying to decriminalize crime. We're in big trouble now.
Can see it now more volunteer training nothing mandated or designed to true change the racial biased of the police for. Need concrete action to ***out the bad apple cops but not limit the police for totally.
Democrats will block it again until they can take credit for it
Reduce and limit the police so the left can bring in and create ter ror under the disguise of social justice.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.