Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Republicans in Iowa, Alabama score legal victories on election rules

Published 10/21/2020, 10:04 PM
Updated 10/22/2020, 05:15 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Senator Doug Jones addresses the all virtual 2020 Democratic Convention hosted from Milwaukee, Wisconsin

By Jason Lange

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Republicans scored legal victories on Wednesday when a Supreme Court ruling allowed Alabama to ban curbside voting and an Iowa court upheld a law that makes it harder to fix problems with absentee ballot requests ahead of the Nov. 3 presidential election.

The rulings were a setback to Democrats, whose presidential candidate, Joe Biden, is running a close race against Republican President Donald Trump in Iowa, while Democratic Senator Doug Jones of Alabama is seen at risk of losing his seat in the election, imperiling Democrats' chances of seizing control of the Senate.

Opinion polls suggest a larger share of Democrats will cast absentee ballots - which include those returned by mail - than will Republicans.

Trump and his Republican allies have argued, without evidence, that voting by mail is rife with fraud, and Republican lawyers have been suing across the country to prevent the easing of election rules because of the COVID-19 pandemic.

In a 5-3 ruling led by the court's more conservative justices, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed Alabama Republican Secretary of State John Merrill to block counties in the state from offering curbside voting in which people can cast ballots in their vehicles outside a polling station.

Merrill has said the ban will prevent election fraud, while proponents of curbside voting say it will help people vote during the COVID-19 health crisis.

In Iowa, the state's top court upheld a state law that makes it harder for county officials to process absentee ballot requests that have missing information.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The law requires that officials contact voters directly to obtain the missing information, rather than use the state's voter registration database to fill in the blanks.

Iowa has a Saturday deadline for requesting a ballot for the election.

Latest comments

https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/docs/pacei-voterfraudcases.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0kPCSmTRe6j8wTeMdI73IljE5xLkOQAk_L31lnbIBmh9Jnn5CJDt9Esvk
Who gives this a thumbs down?.. mindless zombies. Everywhere libs and their media pets claim Trump has no evidence of rampant voter fraud via absentee ballots... well here it is, and they still choose to shut their eyes.
381 pages of over 1000 examples of viter fraud that actually webt to court.
well then it's a good thing that no one vits
The whitehouse put some evidence on its webpage. Wasnt too hard to find the evidence. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/docs/pacei-voterfraudcases.pdf?fbclid=IwAR0kPCSmTRe6j8wTeMdI73IljE5xLkOQAk_L31lnbIBmh9Jnn5CJDt9Esvk
I don’t think first ammendment rights apply here or on any private communications platform, e.g. Twitter, FB, etc... Just wait until the underlying networks start exercising their new “non net neutrality” rights, you won’t be able to write or read anything that hasn’t been filtered to meet with their personal agendas. Enjoy
the less people vote, the better for GOP! the more voting turnout, the better for Dems! GOP is a fraud, and they can only survive on fraudulent practices...their time is over because the next generation of voters is more educated!
Lol that is hilarious. Love how none of you "educated" dems ever post any actual proof backed up by facts/stats, just useless words. Good job bud
Democrats are moderating comments SMH
"Moderation" is not OK. You have no right to be judge and jury of any comments, especially when they counter your advocasy positions. Post what I said verbatim. No self-righteous filters, please.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.