Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

Republicans appeal Trump Colorado ballot disqualification to US Supreme Court - attorney

Published 12/27/2023, 08:00 PM
Updated 12/28/2023, 08:26 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of the Colorado Supreme Court in Denver, Colorado, U.S., December 20, 2023, the day after the court ruled that former President Donald Trump is disqualified from serving as U.S. president and cannot appear on the primary ballot

By John Kruzel

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The Colorado Republican Party on Wednesday asked the U.S. Supreme Court to intervene after Colorado's top court disqualified former President Donald Trump from appearing on the state's Republican primary ballot, an attorney for the Republican group said.

The appeal comes after the Colorado Supreme Court on Dec. 19 disqualified Trump because of his role in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol by his supporters. The court barred Trump under a U.S. constitutional provision prohibiting anyone who "engaged in insurrection or rebellion" from holding public office.

The Colorado Republican Party is being represented by Jay Sekulow of the conservative litigation firm the American Center for Law & Justice.

Trump, the frontrunner for the Republican 2024 presidential nomination, is expected to file his own appeal. The state high court had put its decision on hold until Jan. 4, stating that Trump would remain on the ballot if he appealed.

The Colorado court's ruling marked the first time in history that Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution's Fourteenth Amendment - the so-called disqualification clause - had been used to deem a presidential candidate ineligible for the White House.

The 4-3 Colorado Supreme Court ruling reversed a lower court judge's conclusion that Trump engaged in insurrection by inciting his supporters to violence, but as president, he was not an "officer of the United States" who could be disqualified under the Fourteenth Amendment.

The Colorado court concluded that Trump's role instigating violence at the Capitol as lawmakers met to certify the results of the 2020 election constituted engaging in insurrection, and that the presidency is covered by the insurrection provision.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The attack was an attempt by Trump's supporters to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democratic President Joe Biden, which Trump falsely claims was the result of fraud.

Courts have rejected several lawsuits seeking to keep Trump off the primary ballot in other states. Minnesota's top court rebuffed an effort to disqualify Trump from the Republican primary in that state but did not rule on his overall eligibility to serve as president.

Latest comments

Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this Article (Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States) What constitution do these ill-educated people follow? No comment on journalism
Just as with the 13th Amendment, granting Congress the power to enforce the provisions does not make such enforcement exclusive to Congress.
so many people supporting Donald Trump's attempt to overthrow American democracy then hiding behind phoney outrage when the Courts try to follow the Constitutional Remedy for Donald Trump's instigating and supporting inserection and sedition.
substitute the word Democrat's in place of Donald Trump's in your sentence.  Trump has been indicted, not convicted.  If he is found guilty, then you will have a valid argument.   Otherwise, these people have been illegally removing his name from the ballots.
So many democratic liberals in the name of democracy and law use undemocratic and illegal methods "Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article"(14 Amendment) Could you please explain in what capacity all these state judges and unelected officials are preventing Trump from being a candidate?
everyone is equal
dont stain the history
Donald Trump has already done that...
 Opposition to liberal communists working with Putin's methods, calling themselves democrats (what a Putin-style demagogy) stains everyone.
This will be interesting at the end, a State Supreme Court ruling found to be unconstitutional.
Just taking someone's name off the ballot --- is that what the liberals call "voter suppression"?? Or are they once again defying the will of the people?
no Jimmy it's called following the Constitution and limiting the attempts by one Man to seize power and overthrrow democracy.
 Section 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article"(14 Amendment) Which constitution do you follow, the Russian one? Because in the American there is none of the lies you write
This is Soviet era type totalitarianism. This is banana republic style politics in action right here in our once great United States of America. If Democrats succeed in keeping Trump off the ballot in ANY state, it is a sure sign that we have lost our Republic.
No truer words were ever spoken!
Braindead word salad. Right wing extremists are triggered by a decision in our LEGAL system. Weak.
spoken by a man who supports the attempts to overthrrow American democracy by Donald Trump... mark Gesswein...
taking the lead candidate off the ballot isn't shady at all and anyone who even suggests that it is is an insurrectionist.
Too funny!
Triggered by the law? Weak trump simp.
Biden is great. I love the new 10,000 migrants that came over today, they're great investors
Let's go Brandon!!
whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty?
That's only the ruling class
It's a civil case. Innocent until proven guilty only applies to criminal cases.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.