Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Access the Market Tools Trusted by Thousands of Investors Get Started

Barrett's U.S. Supreme Court confirmation edges closer after Sunday vote

Published Oct 25, 2020 06:12AM ET Updated Oct 26, 2020 05:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Senate holds confirmation hearing for Amy Coney Barrett to be Supreme Court Justice

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Republican-controlled U.S. Senate on Sunday moved closer toward a final confirmation vote on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, on Monday, just over a week before Election Day.

The Senate voted 51-48, largely along party lines, on Sunday afternoon to limit debate on the nomination, teeing up the final vote that is expected to take place on Monday evening.

With Republicans controlling the chamber 53-47 and no indication of an internal revolt against the conservative appeals court judge replacing liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Barrett looks almost certain to take up a lifetime appointment on the bench over universal Democratic opposition.

Only two Republican senators - Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine - opposed limiting debate.

However, Murkowski said on Saturday she still intends to vote to confirm Barrett this week.

"I have no doubt about her capability to do the job and to do it well," she said on Saturday.

No nominee to the Supreme Court has ever been confirmed by the Senate this close to a presidential election. More than 58 million ballots have already been cast ahead of Election Day on Nov. 3.

Democrats boycotted the committee vote on Thursday that advanced the nomination to a final vote on the Senate floor.

Ahead of Monday night's vote, Democrats expressed concerns about the risks of contracting COVID-19, after several Republican Senate staffers and several members of Vice President Mike Pence's team tested positive for COVID-19.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer urged Democrats not to congregate in the Senate chamber and to cast their votes "quickly and from a safe distance."

It was not immediately clear whether Pence will go to the Senate on Monday for the confirmation vote, and U.S. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Sunday twice declined to answer reporters' questions about it.

On Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said Pence "reportedly intends to come" to the Senate chamber to preside over the final vote, and blasted him for being willing to put "the health of everyone who works in this building at risk."

"It sets a terrible, terrible example to the American people," Schumer said. "The Republican party is willing to ignore the pandemic to rush this Supreme Court nomination forward."

Some of his Republican colleagues, meanwhile, did not appear too concerned.

"We've done a very good job within the Senate to follow the guidelines as best we can and I think the vice president will do the same," Senator Mike Rounds told reporters, adding that Pence was "very responsible."

With Barrett on board, the Supreme Court would have a solid 6-3 conservative majority that could last for years. In the short term, Barrett could weigh in on voting cases involving the Trump campaign before or after Election Day.

Trump has said he believes the Supreme Court will decide the election's outcome and has made clear he wants Barrett on the bench for any election-related cases.

Barrett is also likely to participate in the Nov. 10 oral arguments in which Trump and fellow Republicans are asking the court to strike down the Affordable Care Act, the health reform law known as Obamacare.

A favorite of Christian conservatives, Barrett frustrated Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats during her confirmation hearing this month by sidestepping questions on abortion, presidential powers, climate change, voting rights, Obamacare and other issues.

Barrett, nominated on Sept. 26 to succeed Ginsburg, has criticized previous rulings upholding Obamacare but said during her confirmation hearing she has no agenda to invalidate the measure.

Democrats were incensed that Republicans moved forward with Barrett's confirmation process so near an election after refusing in 2016 to allow the chamber to act on a Supreme Court nomination by Trump's Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama, because it was an election year.

Republicans are hoping Barrett's confirmation can give a boost to Trump and incumbent senators in the party facing tough re-election fights.

Barrett, 48, has been a federal appeals court judge since 2017 and previously was a legal scholar at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana.

Trump touted his nomination of Barrett during a campaign rally in New Hampshire on Sunday, telling a cheering crowd, "We're giving you a great new Supreme Court justice."

Barrett's U.S. Supreme Court confirmation edges closer after Sunday vote
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (6)
TL Chan
TL Chan Oct 26, 2020 5:50AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Trump is saving the western and the world's civilization, wake up human!
David David
David9 Oct 26, 2020 5:50AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This must be the joke of the century...
Eduardo Rodriguez
Eduardo Rodriguez Oct 26, 2020 5:50AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Remind me which side is saying 8 year olds should be able to decide being transgender and supporting "peaceful protests" for dead thugs?
Dan Mej
Dan Mej Oct 26, 2020 1:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The Supreme Court is unbalance now, not good a will lead to more riots and suppression.
Eduardo Rodriguez
Eduardo Rodriguez Oct 26, 2020 1:41AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
"Balance" is ignorance. There should no "sides." Judges/Justices are supposed to rule based on the law and Constitution, not their politics.
Christopher Dunson
Christopher Dunson Oct 25, 2020 6:51PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
She's a lock
Zack Harding
Zack Harding Oct 25, 2020 10:25AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Fill that Seat, We the People won an election that doesnt expire until Jan. 20th and would like it filled. Have a nice day.
Oct 25, 2020 10:25AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
That’s a constitutional answer.respect!
Hodor Baratheon
Hodor Baratheon Oct 25, 2020 10:25AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
hypocritical in the 4 year down of things, but you aren't wrong
David David
David9 Oct 25, 2020 6:44AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I don't think she'll make it...she is not that good so will failed her interview...
haifa green
haifa green Oct 25, 2020 6:44AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Cant fail if they pushing the agenda
Zack Harding
Zack Harding Oct 25, 2020 6:44AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
She is well qualified, This is just the progressive left throwing a fit because they can’t continue to Weaponize the courts like Obama did.
Hodor Baratheon
Hodor Baratheon Oct 25, 2020 6:44AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
we're Republicans throwing a fit and wrong 4 years ago? or is this just your nonsense bias rambling? the reality is there's nothing much to change what it is, but you're pretty transparently into this tribal, no self reflective reasoning
James Marshall
James Marshall Oct 25, 2020 6:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
imagine a world so evil people hate someone (Barrett) because she is "Pro-Life"
James Marshall
James Marshall Oct 25, 2020 6:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
it's here. If you can not see the path we are on, then its your choice to wake up. we all expire and have to face our decisions here.
Dan Mej
Dan Mej Oct 25, 2020 6:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
every time someone wanted to take rights from people own decisions, they did it claiming a better life or world. Nope, mostly just for their own vision!
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email