Join +750K new investors every month who copy stock picks from billionaire's portfoliosSign Up Free

Players digging in for the long haul as damp Paris conditions test patience

Published 09/29/2020, 04:15 PM
Updated 09/29/2020, 04:20 PM
© Reuters. French Open

PARIS (Reuters) - The balls are heavier, the air cooler, the clay damper and at this year's autumnal French Open the matches are going longer as players are forced to grind it out on the dirt.

Even in the balmy days of May and June, the tournament's usual date, the Parisian claycourts are the ultimate test of technique and mental and physical staying power.

But the switch to drizzly September because of the COVID-19 pandemic, plus a switch to a heavier ball, has given some players the impression that they are stuck in quicksand.

Six men's first-round matches have gone past the four-hour mark, including Lorenzo Giustino's six-hour epic against Frenchman Corentin Moutet which he won 18-16 in the fifth set.

Juan Ignacio Londero and Federico Delbonis spent nearly five hours settling their all-Argentine first round duel which Londero eventually won 14-12 in the decider.

In the women's first round four matches went longer than two and a half hours, with Spaniard Garbine Muguruza's 7-5 4-6 8-6 win over Tamara Zidansek stretching over three hours.

With drizzle and humidity making courts extra sticky, the choice of a heavier ball plus the athleticism of the players, the pattern of extended matches is likely to continue.

This raises questions as to why the French Open is the only one of the four Grand Slams not to use a tiebreak in the deciding set.

Wimbledon, scene of the world record 11-hour clash between Nicolas Mahut and John Isner in 2010, introduced a tiebreak at 12-12 in the fifth set in 2019. The U.S. Open paved the way when it brought in a final-set tiebreak at 6-6 in 1970.

The Australian Open, like the U.S. Open, has a tiebreak at 6-6 in the decider, but a first-to-10 version rather than the traditional first-to-seven employed in New York.

DIFFERENT RULES

The fact that the four Slams all have different ways to finish a match is a quirk many feel needs to change.

South African Kevin Anderson, whose 26-24 fifth set win over Isner in the 2018 Wimbledon semi-final prompted the All England Club to act, thinks the French Open should follow suit.

"I think it's good to have some sort of limit on it," he said after his first-round win over Laslo Djere on Tuesday.

"I would definitely encourage the French Open to do that."

Women's second seed Karolina Pliskova, who needed more than two hours to get past Egyptian Mayar Sherif on Tuesday, also thinks a tiebreak should be employed at the French.

"If it's 10-10, or something like that," she said. "I think tiebreaks would be brutal but, yeah, it's how it is."

Russian 13th seed Andrey Rublev slogged back from two sets down to beat Sam Querrey on Tuesday, the first time he had produced such a great escape in his career.

He said he relished long deciding sets.

"In my opinion, they shouldn't do tiebreak fifth," he told reporters. "These matches, it's something that you will remember, something that makes you understand why you worked so hard, doing all the tough exercises.

© Reuters. French Open

"They make you feel even more proud of yourself."

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.