Get 40% Off
🤯 Perficient is up a mind-blowing 53%. Our ProPicks AI saw the buying opportunity in March.Read full update

Yellen rebrands Biden economic agenda as 'modern supply-side economics'

Published 01/21/2022, 12:04 PM
Updated 01/21/2022, 05:05 PM
© Reuters. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen addresses the U.S. Conference of Mayors winter meeting in Washington, U.S. January 19, 2022.  REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

By David Lawder and Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen on Friday rebranded the Biden administration's economic agenda as "modern supply-side economics," using a Reagan-era phrase favored by Republicans to assert that Democrats' spending plans will boost the U.S. economy's productive capacity.

Yellen said in a speech to the World Economic Forum that rather than tax cuts and deregulation, her modernized version seeks to increase labor supply and improve infrastructure, education and research to boost potential U.S. growth and ease inflationary pressures.

"Our new approach is far more promising than the old supply- side economics, which I see as having been a failed strategy for increasing growth," Yellen said. "Significant tax cuts on capital have not achieved their promised gains. And deregulation has a similarly poor track record in general and with respect to environmental policies — especially so with respect to curbing CO2 emissions."

Yellen did not announce any policy shifts as she introduced the concept, which suggests it may be a new tactic to persuade Americans and moderate Democrats in Congress to support the "Build Back Better" social spending and climate investment plan, which stalled in December.

The new nomenclature emphasizes the administration's efforts to expand the U.S. workforce - a sentiment echoed by President Joe Biden in a speech to mayors on Friday - and increase productivity, forces that could help quell inflationary pressures while supporting a stronger growth rate.

The administration is trying to blunt the political fallout from high inflation that hit 7% last month amid labor, housing and goods shortages, the biggest annual increase in nearly 40 years, and counter claims that further spending would fuel further inflation.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A DIFFERENT SUPPLY SIDE

Yellen's vision of "supply-side economics" would differ greatly from the "Reaganomics" version that burst into the mainstream in the 1980s with the election of Ronald Reagan as president.

Then, lower taxes and lighter regulation were touted as the fuel that would make U.S. businesses more competitive and profitable, unleashing capital investment that would "trickle down" to the wider economy, fueling growth and hiring.

At the same time, Republicans argued, the tax cuts would "pay for themselves" through turbocharged growth - a phenomenon that has never come to pass.

Yellen argued that the "supply" needs of the economy center around the availability of labor, which has been constrained by the pandemic and in the view of Democrats by the absence of policies around things like child and elder care that could allow more people to join the workforce.

Yellen identified two years of universal early childhood education and an expanded earned income tax credit as "core" components of the Build Back Better plan going forward.

She added that Republican-passed tax cuts in 2017, rather than encourage investment in the United States, have perpetuated the 'perverse corporate tax incentives' that have encouraged companies to shift productive capacity overseas as countries compete on taxes. The deal for a global 15% corporate minimum tax, which depends on passage of Build Back Better for implementation, would end this "race to the bottom" she said.

"Modern supply-side economics seeks to spur economic growth by both boosting labor supply and raising productivity, while reducing inequality and environmental damage," Yellen said. "Essentially, we aren’t just focused on achieving a high topline growth number that is unsustainable — we are instead aiming for growth that is inclusive and green."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

yellen would say anything to agree with the president #worst former fed pres
Is anyone really believing this woman anymore? haha
Correct!!!!!!!!
Nobody could continue to believe this kind of continuous lies!!!
I completely agree with her, at least what she says, but it should have been implemented under Obama after the 2008 crisis, not after one of the highest growth period in history, to which succeeded a sanitory crisis. That kind of plan should have most of its effect 10 to 20 years from now, Americans will never support that, they want fast results. Overall more spendings should increase inflation if anything, unless investments increase the supply of qualified workers (in 20 years), lower the cost of electricity (when the infrastructure will be built), or when new ways of productions and transport are in place, aka electrification (the same, when they will be built).
Is the Kool Aid really that delicious? Socialism is Socialism. Go read a history book
Yellen is hot
Modern economics has led to 90% of the US population losing 35% of its purchasing power over the last 50 years. And, the destruction of natural population growth. But, hey! Do more of the same, only rebrand it. That's the golden ticket.
That's completely false.
Sure. Great job. Rename a failure and make it all better.
This certainly doesn't make any sense, the story and what she states is Biden's plan. What is needed is for those able to work, but not because of government payments, to ho back to work with the ending of the payments. Also, get the military to help unload the goods and products sitting off shore. Both of these two moves would work to decrease the cost of labor and products or materials. There are some supply sides actions to be taken that won't cost much in view of the return.
I wonder what it cost to buy her soul😏
not much
If it costs more money, wait until we have paid off some present debt.  Isn’t that call intelligent money management?
Strawman
New economy, better known as fascism
You're the expert
depends on when the dictionary was written. the liberal education system is rewriting history as they see fit.
I never heard of that term, but coroprations are not the product of the government, they are what happens when all resources belong to individuals. They can also buy the government.
So higher taxes , more regulations and windmills are going to fix the supply problems? lmao! Who believes this ****.
apparently bIDEN voters...🤣🤣🤣🤣
 Even they (Biden voters) know that part is hogwash. They just like the Mo' Money, Mo' Money, Mo' Money that keeps coming their way.
Investment in education will provide more qualified workers and restrain companies to hire overseas. Investment in infrastructures will lower the cost of electricity in the end. He should provide a plan to create nuclear plant imo. Electrification will lead to a more efficient use of energy, so when the electricity price gets cheaper with more production then everything is cheaper. But of course, it should all have effects 20 years from now, and Americans can't wait that long. I thought jim morisson would be more eco friendly.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.