Get 40% Off
These stocks are up over 10% post earnings. Did you spot the buying opportunity? Our AI did.Read how

Biden orders ban on certain US tech investments in China

Published 08/08/2023, 11:57 PM
Updated 08/10/2023, 08:06 AM
© Reuters. U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks on access to mental health care in the East Room of the White House in Washington, U.S., July 25, 2023. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

By Karen Freifeld, Andrea Shalal and David Shepardson

NEW YORK/WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Joe Biden on Wednesday signed an executive order that will prohibit some new U.S. investment in China in sensitive technologies like computer chips and require government notification in other tech sectors.

The long-awaited order authorizes the U.S. Treasury secretary to prohibit or restrict U.S. investments in Chinese entities in three sectors: semiconductors and microelectronics, quantum information technologies and certain artificial intelligence systems.

The administration said the restrictions would apply to "narrow subsets" of the three areas but did not give specifics. The proposal is open for public input.

The order is aimed at preventing American capital and expertise from helping China develop technologies that could support its military modernization and undermine U.S. national security. The measure targets private equity, venture capital, joint ventures and greenfield investments.

Biden, a Democrat, said in a letter to Congress he was declaring a national emergency to deal with the threat of advancement by countries like China "in sensitive technologies and products critical to the military, intelligence, surveillance or cyber-enabled capabilities."

China said on Thursday it is "gravely concerned" about the order and that it reserves the right to take measures.

The order affects normal operation and decision-making of enterprises, and undermines the international economic and trade order, a statement from the Chinese Commerce Ministry read.

The ministry also said it hopes the U.S. will respect laws of the market economy and the principle of fair competition, and refrain from "artificially hindering global economic and trade exchanges and cooperation, or set up obstacles for the recovery of the world economy".

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Chinese foreign ministry said the country was "strongly dissatisfied" with and "resolutely opposes the U.S.'s insistence on introducing investment restrictions on China", having also lodged solemn representations with the U.S.

China urged the U.S. to fulfill Biden's promise of no intention to decouple from China or obstruct China's economic development, the ministry said in a statement.

In a separate statement Hong Kong's government said the US restrictions were "unreasonable measures" against the special Chinese administrative region and said that they "hindered and disrupted normal investment and trade activities."

"The measures undermine the international economic and trade order and damage the economic and commercial interests of American companies themselves", the Hong Kong government said, adding that it created more uncertainty for global economic growth.

SEMICONDUCTORS A PRIORITY

The proposal focuses on investments in Chinese companies developing software to design computer chips and tools to manufacture them. The U.S., Japan and the Netherlands dominate those fields, and the Chinese government has been working to build homegrown alternatives.

The White House said Biden consulted allies on the plan and incorporated feedback from Group of Seven nations.

"For too long, American money has helped fuel the Chinese military’s rise," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer. "Today the United States is taking a strategic first step to ensure American investment does not go to fund Chinese military advancement."

The regulations will only affect future investments, not existing ones, Treasury said, but it may ask for disclosure of prior transactions.

The move could fuel tensions between the world's two largest economies. The Chinese embassy in Washington said it was "very disappointed" by the measure.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

U.S. officials insisted the prohibitions were intended to address "the most acute" national security risks and not to separate the two countries' highly interdependent economies.

Republicans said the order was rife with loopholes, such as only applying to future investment, and was not aggressive enough.

SOME EXEMPTIONS EXPECTED

The order will prohibit some deals and require investors to notify the government of their plans on others.

The Treasury said it anticipates exempting "certain transactions, including potentially those in publicly traded instruments and intracompany transfers from U.S. parents to subsidiaries."

The Chinese tech industry, once a magnet for U.S. venture capital, has already seen a drastic decline in U.S. investment amid intensifying geopolitical tension.

Last year, total U.S.-based venture-capital investment in China plummeted to $9.7 billion from $32.9 billion in 2021, according to PitchBook data. This year so far, U.S. V.C. investors only put $1.2 billion into Chinese tech startups.

The measure is expected to be implemented next year, a person briefed on the order said, after multiple rounds of public comment, including an initial 45-day comment period.

REPUBLICAN SEES MANY LOOPHOLES

Republican Senator Marco Rubio said the Biden administration' plan was "almost laughable."

"It is riddled with loopholes, explicitly ignores the dual-use nature of important technologies, and fails to include industries China’s government deems critical," he said.

A spokesman for the Chinese embassy in Washington said the White House had not heeded "China’s repeated expression of deep concerns" about the plan.

The spokesman said more than 70,000 U.S. companies do business in China. The restrictions will hurt both Chinese and American businesses, interfere with normal cooperation and reduce investor confidence in the U.S., he said.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The Semiconductor Industry Association said it hopes the order will enable "U.S. chip firms to compete on a level-playing field and access key global markets, including China."

Emily Benson of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a bipartisan policy research organization, said key questions are how the plan affects U.S. allies and how China responds.

Latest comments

His mask doesn't look like it fits right in that picture.
Kind of funny none of those things that they complained about Trump doing were reversed.  Relations are worse than ever and he's ramping it up.
None of those things? What things, specifically?
  I've said before that Biden's economic/foreign/etc. policies are more similar to his predecessor's than the retrumplicans portray.  Biden has been successful with his policies since he doesn't burden them w/ his own personal baggage.  E.g., they both wanted to pass infrastructure bill, they both want covid vaccines available, both intolerant of CCP b s, etc.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
They must have stopped paying for his beach house. that's 100% true. according to his son
are you submerged in the newsmax and a Fox News?
too soft too many exemptions and too much time given
Let's go Brandon!! Loser
Biden is an absolute joke. just fall of rom corruption
Retrumplicans being pro-CCP!
do you even know what you are talking about?
The day the election took place and the Imran Khan government came to Pakistan and God willing, we will tell you how the ban is imposed.
Ban Ban Ban, on Pakistan Ban, on Afghanistan Ban, on China Ban, on Iran, Inshallah one day such a day will come when we will ban America.
lol go cry in a cave
Dont you mean Bindens puppet master(s)?
Good and it's a direct Crack at ending war, let's China know supporting Russia indirectly not OK
ban this ban that ban all la diu lei
ban on China investments? except they won't ban Wuhan gain of function investments. and make shift illegal labs in CALI. the nerve of these monsters
will be AliBaba and TSMC stocks will be drop by tomorrow ?
Isn't that discrimination?
Not nearly as discriminatory as the CCP is toward US investments in China.
The main difference between Trump and Biden's China policy, is that Trump's China policy actually strengthened the US and made China come to the table. Biden's China policy has given China the strength work with Russia and India, while having Biden launder millions of dollars into his own pockets at US taxpayer expense. Biden's economic policy is so detrimental that the US debt has been downgraded for the first time in US history. The only "drama" surrounding Trump is that fabricated by democrats who are upset that Queen Hillary did not get rigged into office.
how did Reuters let this comment through? so much censorship on here. iam amazed this slipped through. kudos you are 1M %% correct
 Yeah they ban a lot of words. They ban conservative accounts frequently, especially around the last election I probably made over a hundred accounts. Democrats cannot win elections fairly even having to resort to banning conservatives form posting comments on sites like this.
Biden's China policies ain't that different from Trump's.  Big difference is there's way less drama & posturing from the US side, whose potus ain't trying to shamelessly ingratiate himself with Xi by calling that tyrant a good friend.
"Trump’s Conflicts of Interest in China - China has been busy buying Trump properties since the election and has granted Trump a long-sought series of trademarks in the country—just days after Trump reversed his position on Taiwan." -- americanprogress.org  ...  "Donald Trump's new social media project is backed by a venture that appears to have opaque Chinese connections, new findings have shown." -- newsweek.com
"China Paid Trump Millions In Rent. Then He Left The White House - During the four years that Donald Trump occupied the White House, the state-owned Industrial and Commercial Bank of China paid him an estimated $7 million to rent space in Trump Tower. Despite the extraordinary circumstances of the deal—involving the government of China, the president of the United States, and millions of dollars—the Trump family portrayed the agreement as a standard business transaction. Previously unreported documents call that characterization into question,” reports Dan Alexander.  Lending records show that that the Chinese bank abandoned Trump Tower around the time Trump left the White House. The bank’s departure seemed to come suddenly, in the first half of 2021 and less than two years after the bank exercised what Eric Trump ... described as a five-year extension."  --  forbes.com
"Republicans Finally Admit They Have No Incriminating Evidence on Joe Biden - A 65-page report, a press conference, and nothing to show for it"  --  newrepublic.com, May 2023
I’m sure anyone who made payments to Hunter and the Biden family will be exempt, just like certain Russian billionaires were exempt from sanctions.
trump had chinese bank accounts WHILE sitting as president, yet you choose to keep droning on about HB, who holds no political office...
based on what information is that failed Durham investigation perhaps?
The difference is legitimate vs. illegitimate business in China.
Might as well impose sanctions to companies to invest in China......let the commies civilization regress
If it's commie, it's regression is part of its design.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.